RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Counting of accountable items used during surgery, frequently called 'the count', is a fundamental practice to ensure that items such as surgical instruments, sponges and sharps are not forgotten within patients. Although inadvertently leaving behind a sponge or instrument at the end of an operation is a rare event, it is an error that may have serious implications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this evidence implementation project was to contribute to promoting evidence-based practice in surgical counts in open abdominal and pelvic surgeries and thereby improving the outcomes of the surgical patients at a surgical centre of a university hospital. METHODS: The current evidence implementation project used the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit and feedback tool. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and GRiP framework for promoting evidence-based healthcare involves three phases of activity: first, establishing a project team and undertaking a baseline audit based on evidence-informed criteria; second, reflecting on the results of the baseline audit and designing and implementing strategies to address non-compliance found in the baseline audit informed by the JBI GRiP framework; third, conducting a follow-up audit to assess the outcomes of the interventions implemented to improve practice, and identify future practice issues to be addressed in subsequent audits. These three phases were performed over a period of 6 months, from August 2017 to March 2018. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed deficits between old and best practice in all criteria. Barriers for implementation of a protocol for surgical counts were identified, and strategies were implemented. The postimplementation (follow-up) audit showed improvement in compliance with best practice in six of the audit criteria selected except two, a multidisciplinary team approach to decrease retained surgical items, and limited staff hand-offs during surgical procedures to ensure the same team is present in all counting episodes. CONCLUSION: The main achievements of the study included substantial increases in compliance with best practice. However, registration and report and commitment of all members of surgical team to apply the entire protocol, avoiding to skip any step, persist as challenges.
Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Corpos Estranhos/prevenção & controle , Pelve/cirurgia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Brasil , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Enfermagem de Centro Cirúrgico/métodos , Enfermagem de Centro Cirúrgico/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compliance of the practice with the evidence-based criteria in relation to interventions developed to improve the immunosuppressive adherence of adults in postkidney transplantation. METHOD: A best practice implementation project, based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit tool for promoting change in health practice, was conducted. A baseline and a follow-up audit were conducted in a kidney transplant clinic, including a sample of kidney transplant patients with a maximum of 30 days postoperatively, and health professionals working in the post-transplant period. RESULTS: The basic audit revealed that the parameters related to the professionals' knowledge did not reach adequate compliance; the involvement of patients in strategies to overcome barriers that interfere with nonadherence; guidelines for specific therapeutic regimens for patients and the prescription of immunosuppressants according to the patient's routine. To solve the identified weaknesses, training strategies were implemented with the professionals, follow-up by telephone contact with the patients and the elaboration and distribution of an educational booklet with guidance on the use of immunosuppressants, leading to an increase from 50 to 87.5% of conformity in the evaluated service. CONCLUSION: The evidence implementation project provided improvements in clinical practice behaviors. It demonstrated that there are strategies that facilitate the implementation of evidence regarding the promotion of interventions to improve immunosuppressive adherence. Additional audits are still needed to improve and assess the quality of interventions promoted by professionals regarding drug adherence in the post-transplant period, as well as to verify the behavior of patients, ensuring that the project will be maintained and supported.