RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between self-reported symptoms of pediatric OSA and clinical signs in MB children. METHODS: Seventy-three MB children aged 7-14 years answered an interview questionnaire on OSA symptoms in childhood, focusing on chewing, nasal, and sleep disturbances. MB children were checked for changes on the craniofacial, occlusion, TMJ, upper airway, and body posture by a multi-disciplinary team, consisting of medical residents, dental, and psychology postgraduate students. Multiple logistic regression analysis verified the association between clinical signs and self-reported symptoms. RESULTS: Reported symptoms of chewing disturbance as TMD noise, muscle pain, and morning headache were significantly associated with the presence of lip incompetence and Class II malocclusion. Sleep disturbances as snoring, waking up at night, daytime sleepiness, and sleeping with the mouth open were significantly associated with the presence of hypertrophic tonsils and obstructive Mallampati score. CONCLUSION: Symptoms of pediatric OSA were found in mouth-breathing children, which should be carefully investigated in order to prevent OSA in the future.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The effects of medium to long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or physical activity in decreasing oxidative stress, inflammatory, and cell-free DNA markers in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been explored. Here we evaluate oxidative stress markers (TBARS, AOPP, SOD), proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10), and cell-free DNA levels before and after 8-week CPAP treatment or moderate-intensity aerobic training in moderate to severe OSA. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with OSA were randomly divided into CPAP (N = 18), with or without humidifier, and exercise groups (N = 21). Excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep quality were assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh questionnaire, respectively. Biomarkers for lipid and protein oxidation, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and cell-free DNA were quantified in blood samples, before and after 8 weeks of both treatments. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of either CPAP or exercise, no significant differences were observed in the levels of cell-free DNA, oxidative stress, and inflammation markers, except for an increase in AOPP and IL-17A levels in individuals who went through CPAP, which were higher when the CPAP device was used without the humidifier. We have also observed that CPAP significantly decreased the Pittsburgh scores and improved sleep efficiency and hours of sleep, while ESS scores remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment for OSA, be it CPAP therapy or moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, was not sufficient to alter either the oxidative stress and inflammatory profiles or the cell-free DNA levels of moderate to severe OSA patients. Short-term CPAP did, however, improve self-reported sleep quality.
Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas , Terapia por Exercício , Inflamação/sangue , Estresse Oxidativo/fisiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mouth breathing (MB) is an etiological factor for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during childhood. The habit of breathing through the mouth may be perpetuated even after airway clearance. Both habit and obstruction may cause facial muscle imbalance and craniofacial changes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to propose and test guidelines for clinical recognition of MB and some predisposing factors for SDB in children. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 110 orthodontists regarding their procedures for clinical evaluation of MB and their knowledge about SDB during childhood. Thereafter, based on their answers, guidelines were developed and tested in 687 children aged between 6 and 12 years old and attending elementary schools. RESULTS: There was no standardization for clinical recognition of MB among orthodontists. The most common procedures performed were inefficient to recognize differences between MB by habit or obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines proposed herein facilitate clinical recognition of MB, help clinicians to differentiate between habit and obstruction, suggest the most appropriate treatment for each case, and avoid maintenance of mouth breathing patterns during adulthood.