RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is common among young children in Argentina. Use of the currently available prophylactic agent is limited to children aged ≤ 2 years with selected high-risk conditions, and thus the majority of infants remain unprotected. We estimated the value-based price (VBP) of a novel RSVpreF vaccine for use among pregnant people for prevention of RSV-LRTI among infants during the first year of life. METHODS: Clinical outcomes and economic costs of RSV-LRTI during infancy and expected impact of RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy were projected using a population-based Markov-type cohort model. Model results-estimated on the basis of gestational age at birth, disease/fatality rates, and mother's vaccination status-include total numbers of RSV-LRTI cases, RSV-LRTI-related deaths, and associated costs. Base case analyses (RSVpreF vs. no vaccine) were conducted from the healthcare system perspective. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA; 1000 replications) were also conducted. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) was $10,636 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY; i.e., 1 × 2021 gross domestic product [GDP] per capita) in base case analyses and PSA. Costs are reported in USD, estimated on the basis of the June 22, 2023 exchange rate. RESULTS: Use of RSVpreF among 342,110 pregnant persons provided protection to 330,079 infants at birth. In total, RSVpreF prevented 3915 RSV hospitalizations, 6399 RSV cases requiring emergency department care, 6182 RSV cases requiring a physician office visit, and 67 disease-related deaths. Direct costs were projected to be reduced by $5.0 million. With 2061 QALYs gained and vaccine administration cost of $1.4 million, the VBP of RSVpreF was estimated to be $74.46 per dose. In PSA, mean VBP was $75.02 (95% confidence interval 54.24-97.30). CONCLUSIONS: RSVpreF among pregnant persons would significantly reduce the clinical and economic burden of RSV-LRTI among infants in Argentina and would be considered a cost-effective intervention up to a price of approximately $75.
RESUMO
Introducción: la evidencia de vida real muestra deficiencias en alcanzar los objetivos de control del asma, con elevado consumo de agonistas beta-2 de acción corta (SA-BA) y sobreuso de corticoides sistémicos (CS). Métodos: estudio observacional, des-criptivo, aplicando la herramienta ReferID con 4 preguntas para identificar pacientes con asma no controlada y/o en riesgo de crisis severas: en los últimos 12 meses [1] ¿Re-cibió ≥2 ciclos de CS y/o los usó como mantenimiento?; [2] ¿Tuvo ≥2 visitas a emergen-cias por asma?; [3] ¿Estuvo intubado o en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) por as-ma?; [4] ¿Cuántos inhaladores de SABA ha utilizado? Una respuesta afirmativa a las preguntas 1, 2 o 3, o usar ≥3 envases de SABA, sugieren riesgo de ataque grave, nece-sidad de CS y/o riesgo vital. En estos pacientes se recomienda evaluación por especia-listas. Resultados: participaron 441 pacientes de 7 instituciones del Área Metropolita-na de Buenos Aires. Al 60,1% (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95]:55,5%-64,7%) se le recomendó evaluación por especialista. El 33,8% (IC95:29,39%-38,21%) recibió ≥2 ciclos de CS y/o los usaba como mantenimiento. El 36,1% (IC95:31,62%-40,58%) asis-tió ≥2 veces a emergencias. El 41,5% (IC95:30,06%-38,94%) usó ≥3 envases de SABA. El 8,8% (IC95:6,16%-11,44%) tenía historia de intubación o UCI. El 37,2% se atendió en instituciones públicas, con indicadores de gravedad significativamente mayores que en las privadas. Conclusiones: ReferID es una herramienta simple que ayuda a identificar a pacientes en riesgo de crisis severa y/o que pudieran tener diagnóstico de asma gra-ve; y que se beneficiarían de una evaluación por un especialista. AU
Introduction: real-life evidence shows deficiencies in achieving asthma control goals, with high use of short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) and overuse of systemic cortico-steroids (SC). Methods: observational, descriptive study, applying the ReferID tool with 4 questions to identify patients with uncontrolled asthma and/or at risk of severe crisis: in the last 12 months [1] Have you received ≥2 cycles of CS and/or used them as main-tenance therapy?; [2] Have you had ≥2 emergency visits for asthma?; [3] Have you ever been intubated or admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for asthma?; [4] How many SABA inhalers have you used? An affirmative answer to questions 1, 2 or 3, or using ≥3 canisters of SABA, suggests risk of severe attack, need for CS and/or life-threatening risk. In these patients, evaluation by specialists is recommended. Results: 441 patients from 7 institutions in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires were enrolled. An evalu-ation by specialists was recommended for 60.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 55.5%-64.7%); 33.8% (95%CI:29.39%-38.21%) received ≥2 cycles of CS and/or used them as maintenance; 36.1% (95%CI:31.62%-40.58%) attended ≥2 times to the emer-gency department; 41.5% (95%CI:30.06%-38.94%) used ≥3 containers of SABA; 8.8% (95%CI:6.16%-11.44%) had a history of intubation or ICU admission; 37.2% were as-sisted in public institutions, with significantly higher severity indicators than in private ones. Conclusions: Refer ID is a simple, useful tool to quickly identify asthma patients who are at risk of severe exacerbations and/or may have a diagnosis of severe asthma and would benefit from evaluation by a specialist. AU