RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Venous stenting for acute and chronic venous disease has been increasingly used as more evidence has accumulated on the efficacy and durability of these interventions for symptomatic patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that could have been present for years will often be implicated in the obstructive pathology and removal can be challenging. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether stenting across an indwelling IVC filter is a safe and effective alternative to removal. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone iliocaval stenting at our institution from 2007 to 2020 were identified and divided into groups stratified by the presence of an IVC filter. The operative notes, venography findings, and the electronic health records were queried to obtain the operative details, patient characteristics, postoperative outcomes, stent patency, and survival outcomes. The primary end point was iliocaval stent patency. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an IVC filter with or without overstenting. We used the χ2 test and survival analysis as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 224 consecutive patients were identified, of whom 71 were found to have undergone iliocaval stenting (age, 48 ± 18 years; 47.9% male; body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m2). Of the 71 patients, 15 had had stents placed across an indwelling IVC filter (overstented group) and 56 had not had an IVC filter present (non-overstented group). No differences were found in presentation between the overstented group (acute occlusion, 4 of 15 [26.7%]; chronic occlusion, 8 of 15 [53.3%]; and nonocclusive lesions, 3 of 15 [20%]) and the non-overstented group (acute occlusion, 29 of 56 [52%]; chronic occlusion, 18 of 56 [32%]; nonocclusive lesions, 9 of 56 [16%]; P = .2). Comparisons between the two groups revealed no differences in the baseline characteristics except for age (overstented, 57 ± 15 years; non-overstented, 46 ± 18 years; P = 0.03), preoperative anticoagulation therapy (overstented, 66.6%; non-overstented, 26.9%; P = .01), and bilateral leg symptoms (overstented, 86.7%; non-overstented, 23.2%; P < .001). Primary patency at 30 months was 85.6% in the overstented group and 86.1% in the non-overstented group (P = .78). At follow-up, no adverse events related to filter crushing were reported, and no differences were found in 30-month survival. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center, retrospective study of iliocaval stenting, patients who had undergone overstenting across an indwelling IVC filter had had patency rates similar to those whose stents had been placed with no IVC filter in place. Thus, complex IVC filter removal, when not possible or when the risk of operative complications is too high, can be forgone in favor of stenting across the IVC filter, with no implications on midterm patency or adverse events.
Assuntos
Filtros de Veia Cava , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Veia Cava Inferior , Stents/efeitos adversos , Veia Ilíaca , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination is increasingly used in the treatment of iliofemoral venous disease and provides more sensitive and specific detection of stenotic lesions when compared with traditional multiplanar venography alone. Correlations with deep venous stent patency, however, have not yet been investigated. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of the use of IVUS examination in addition to multiplanar venography on iliofemoral venous patency. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent stenting for symptomatic thrombotic or nonthrombotic iliofemoral venous lesions (NIVLs) between 2014 and 2020 at a single institution were identified and divided into two groups based on whether IVUS examination was used before stent deployment in addition to multiplanar venography compared with venography alone. A retrospective review of demographic, operative, and follow-up data was performed. Thirty-day and 2-year stent patency were measured as primary end points. χ2 analysis, logistic regression models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to determine outcomes. Technical details and outcomes were additionally examined among patients treated for acute deep venous thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, or NIVLs separately on subgroup analysis. RESULTS: We identified 150 patients (173 limbs, 23 bilateral) who underwent iliofemoral stenting during the study period at our institution (mean age: 48.8 ± 16.8 years, 61% female). Adjunctive IVUS utilization before stent deployment was reported in 69 of 173 (39.9%) treated limbs. IVUS examination was more likely to be used in patients who underwent stenting for NIVLs compared with thrombotic disease (41.0% vs 11.2%, P < .01). There was no difference in the number of stents deployed between IVUS and non-IVUS cohorts. However, IVUS examination was associated with the increased total length of the stent deployed (126 ± 56 vs 112 ± 48 mm, P = .04) and a higher rate of infrainguinal stent extension (17.4% vs 6.7%, P = .03). In addition, mean stent diameter was significantly higher when IVUS examination was performed before stent placement (16.3 ± 3.7 vs 15.2 ± 1.9 mm, P < .01). Both 30-day (98.5% vs 89.4%, P = .02) and 2-year (90.3% vs 78.7%, P = .03) primary patency were significantly higher in the IVUS cohort. Adjunctive IVUS use was found to significantly protect against stent reintervention at 2 years on adjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.71, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive IVUS utilization is associated with differences in stent diameter and length selections as well as landing segments in the treatment of thrombotic and nonthrombotic iliofemoral venous disease. IVUS examination before stent deployment significantly protects against 30-day and 2-year stent reintervention when compared with the use of multiplanar venography alone. These data provide stronger evidence for routine IVUS use in addition to venography before iliofemoral venous stenting.
Assuntos
Veia Ilíaca , Doenças Vasculares , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Veia Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iliac venous stenting (IVS) for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disease is increasingly used as evidence of the safety, efficacy and durability of these interventions increases. Female gender has been implicated as a predictor of failure in arterial endovascular interventions. We hypothesize that female gender could be predictive of patency rates of iliac vein stenting. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent IVS for thrombotic or nonthrombotic venous disease at our institution from 2007 until 2019 were identified and divided into groups based on gender. Operative notes, venograms, and the electronic health record were then queried to obtain operative details, co-morbid conditions, postoperative outcomes and stent patency. Study outcome was long term patency rate. The data was analyzed using chi-square, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive patients (231 limbs) were identified in our retrospective analysis, with a mean age of 48.8 ± 17.3, and BMI of 31.6 ± 8.6. Of those, 119 (59.5%) patients, (131 [56.8%] limbs) were female. Comparisons between the gender groups revealed no difference in age, BMI, or preoperative comorbidities. There was no difference in type of venous disease between male (85% thrombotic, 15% nonthrombotic) and female (84% thrombotic, 16% nonthrombotic), P= 0.830. The male cohort was more likely to present with leg ulceration (17% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.002), and the female cohort was more likely to present with leg edema (98.5% vs. 93.0%, P= 0.03). The male cohort had a higher rate of caval (48% vs. 33.6%, P= 0.027) and infrainguinal stent extension. (11% vs. 6.9%, P= 0.02). Females had a higher rate of left sided stenting (80.9% vs. 66/0%, P= 0.010). There was no difference in the median stent diameter used between the cohorts. Primary patency at 5 years was significantly higher for the male cohort (94.1% vs. 74.4%, P= 0.01) On adjusted multivariable cox regression female gender was a predictor of loss of primary patency within 5 years (HR, 4.04; P= 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center retrospective analysis of IVS, male patients were found to have better primary stent patency compared to female.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Veia Ilíaca/fisiopatologia , Stents , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Veia Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) are commonly performed for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The evolving catheter types and treatment algorithms impact the use and outcomes of these interventions. This study aimed to investigate the changes in CDI practice and their impact on outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent CDIs for PE between 2010 and 2019 at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A PE team was launched in 2012, and in 2014 was established as an official Pulmonary Embolism Response Team. CDI annual use trends and clinical failures were recorded. Clinical success was defined as physiologic improvement in the absence of major bleeding, perioperative stroke or other procedure-related adverse event, decompensation for submassive or persistent shock for massive PE, the need for surgical thromboembolectomy, or death. Major bleeding was defined as requiring a blood transfusion, a surgical intervention, or suffering from an intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: There were 372 patients who underwent a CDI for acute PE during the study period with a mean age of 58.9 ± 15.4 years; there were males 187 (50.3%) and 340 patients has a submassive PE (91.4%). CDI showed a steep increase in the early Pulmonary Embolism Response Team years, peaking in 2016 with a subsequent decrease. Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis was the predominant CDI technique peaking at 84% of all CDI in 2014. Suction thrombectomy use peaked at 15.2% of CDI in 2019. The mean alteplase dose with catheter thrombolysis techniques decreased from 26.8 ± 12.5 mg in 2013 to 13.9 ± 7.5 mg in 2019 (P < .001). The mean lysis time decreased from 17.2 ± 8.3 hours in 2013 to 11.3 ± 8.2 hours in 2019 (P < .001). Clinical success for the massive and the submassive PE cohorts was 58.1% and 91.2%, respectively; the major bleed rates were 25.0% and 5.3%. There were two major clinical success peaks, one in 2015 mirroring our technical learning curve and one in 2019 mirroring our patient selection learning curve. The clinical success decrease in 2018 was primarily derived from blood transfusions owing to acute blood loss during suction thrombectomy. CONCLUSIONS: CDIs for acute PE have rapidly evolved with high success rates. Multidisciplinary approaches among centers with appropriate expertise are advisable for the safe and successful implementation of catheter interventions.
Assuntos
Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombectomia/tendências , Terapia Trombolítica/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Transfusão de Sangue/tendências , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Embolectomia/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Hemostasia Cirúrgica/tendências , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/mortalidade , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) have been increasingly used for selected patients with acute intermediate-risk (submassive) pulmonary embolism (sPE) to prevent decompensation, mortality, and potentially long-term sequelae. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the choice of anesthetic during these interventions has an effect on the postprocedural outcomes. METHODS: Patients who had undergone CDI for acute sPE from 2009 to 2019 were identified and grouped according to the intraprocedural use of propofol. The primary outcome was in-hospital intra- or postprocedural major adverse events, defined as the need for intubation, progression to massive pulmonary embolism, and in-hospital death. Major bleeding events (ie, intracerebral hemorrhage, transfusion of ≥2 U, the need for reintervention) were also assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictors of the studied outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 340 patients (age, 58.74 ± 15.22 years; 51.2% men) had undergone CDI for sPE (85 standard thrombolysis, 229 ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, 26 suction thrombectomy). Propofol had been used for 36 patients (10.6%); the remaining 304 patients (89.4%) had received midazolam plus fentanyl, morphine, or hydromorphone for anesthesia. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar, except for age, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and procedure type, with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis the predominant procedure for the no-propofol group (74%). Overall, 18 patients had experienced ≥1 events of the composite outcome (ie, 10 intubations, 11 decompensations, 2 surgical conversions, 3 deaths). The propofol group had a significantly greater adverse event rate (13.8%; n = 5) compared with the no-propofol group (4.2%; n = 13; P = .015). On multivariate analysis, propofol was still a predictive factor for adverse events (odds ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-12.93; P = .03). A total of 16 patients had experienced major bleeding or other procedure-related events, including stroke in 4 (1.17%), coronary sinus perforation in 1, tricuspid valve rupture in 1, and the need for transfusion in 10 patients. The type of intervention (ie, standard thrombolysis, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, suction thrombectomy) was not a predictive factor for any studied outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CDIs are low-risk procedures with minimal postoperative morbidity and mortality in the setting of acute sPE. However, the use of propofol for intraprocedural sedation should be avoided because it can have detrimental effects.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Trombectomia/mortalidade , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Reports of good short-term outcomes for endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms have led to an increased use of the technique. However, data are lacking on long-term limb-related outcomes and factors associated with the failure of endovascular repair. METHODS: All patients who underwent endovascular popliteal aneurysm repair (EPAR) at a single institution from January 2006 to December 2018 were included in the study. Demographics, indications, anatomic and operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Long-term patency, major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) and graft loss/occlusion were analyzed with multivariable cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 117 limbs from 101 patients with a mean follow-up of 55.6 months (range, 0.43-158 months). The average age was 73 ± 9.3 years. Thirty-two patients (29.1%) were symptomatic (claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, or rupture). The stent grafts crossed the knee joint in 91.4% of cases. In all, 36.8% of procedures used one stent graft, 41.0% used two stent grafts, and 22.2% of procedures used more than two stent grafts. The median arterial length covered was 100 mm, with an average length of stent overlap of 25 mm. Tapered configurations were used in 43.8% of cases. The majority of limbs (62.8%) had a three-vessel runoff, 20.2% had a two-vessel runoff, and 17% has a one-vessel runoff. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft occlusion at 1 and 3 years were 6.3% and 16.2%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 88.2% and 72.6%, and the 1- and 3-year major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) rates were 82% and 57.4%. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 92.9% and 76.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, aneurysm size, one-vessel runoff, and coverage below the knee were associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Coverage below the knee was also associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Other anatomic or technical details were not associated with limb-related events or patency. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest single center analysis to describe the predictors of poor outcomes after EPAR. EPAR is a safe and effective way to treat popliteal artery aneurysms. Factors associated with poor MALE-FS after EPAR include single-vessel tibial runoff and coverage below the knee.