Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Oncol ; 39(11): 786.e1-786.e8, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846085

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy (XRT) has been investigated as a possible treatment for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with the goal of bladder preservation, especially with the ongoing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) shortage. Yet, little is known about the clinical efficacy and the quality of evidence supporting XRT for NMIBC. Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate XRT in the treatment of patients with high-risk NMIBC. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for high-risk NMIBC (high grade T1, T1/Ta with associated risk features: carcinoma in-situ (CIS), multifocality, > 5cm in diameter, and/or multiple recurrences) treated with primary XRT. Outcomes evaluated were recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific-survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and salvage cystectomy and progression to metastatic disease rates. A meta-analysis was performed to assess outcomes for XRT in NMIBC. RESULTS: Overall,13 studies including 746 patients met the search criteria. The 5-year rates of RFS, CSS and OS were 54% (95% CI = 38% - 70%), 86% (95% CI = 80% - 92%), and 72% (95% CI = 64% - 79%). Notably, 13% of patients proceeded to salvage radical cystectomy and 9% developed metastatic disease. All studies were of poor quality, comprising single institution and retrospective studies with only one clinical trial. CONCLUSION: XRT for high-risk NMIBC provides some degree of oncologic control, although distant progression was noted. In the setting of the low-quality evidence, a prospective clinical trial is needed to clearly define the risks and benefits of this approach.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 34(1): 32-7, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20087156

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Primary carcinomas of the trachea are rare tumors, occurring at a rate of 2.6 new cases per 1,000,000 people per year. This study investigates the large observational cohort of patients recorded in the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 1973-2004 database, and provides information regarding epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis. METHODS: The SEER database was investigated, and all patients for whom primary tracheal carcinoma was the first and only cancer were investigated. Demographic information was investigated. The cohort was analyzed for variables effecting survival, including age, gender, race, histology, extent of disease, extent of surgery, use of radiation, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: Between 1973 and 2004, 578 cases of primary tracheal carcinomas were reported in the SEER database. There were 322 men (55.7%) and 256 women (44.3%). Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant histology, representing 259 tumors (44.8%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) was the second most common tumor (16.3%). Localized, regional and distant disease was found in 140 (24.2%), 212 (36.7%), and 108 (18.7%), respectively. Twenty percent of the patients did not undergo staging. Patients with localized disease had a better prognosis than those with regional (P = 0.001) or distant disease (P = <0.001).A significant fraction of patients did not receive cancer directed local therapy; 34.3% did not undergo surgery and 29.1% did not receive any kind of radiation therapy. There was a statistically significant improved survival for patients who underwent any type of surgery in comparison with patients who did not undergo cancer directed surgery. There was no statistical benefit for patients who underwent radiation therapy.General overall 5-year survival for all patients was 27.1% (95% CI: 23.1-33.3%). Patients with localized disease had a better outcome than patients with regional or distant disease with an overall 5-year survival of 46% (95% CI: 37.3%-55.8%). Squamous cell carcinoma tumors had worse outcomes than any other histologic type, with a 5 year overall survival of 12.6% (95% CI: 8.4-17.6%). In contrast, 5-year overall survival for AACs was relatively good at 74.3% (95% CI: 63.1-82.5). For localized disease, 5-year survival was 24.7% (95% CI: 12.8-38.7%) for squamous cell carcinoma versus 90.5% (95% CI: 73.3-96.8%) for ACCs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Primary tracheal tumors are very uncommon; squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic type, followed by ACCs. General 5-year overall survival is poor, though localized disease has better survival when compared with regional or distant disease. There is a remarkable difference in survival between squamous cell carcinoma and ACC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Traqueia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Programa de SEER , Neoplasias da Traqueia/patologia , Neoplasias da Traqueia/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA