Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 133
Filtrar
1.
Front Nutr ; 11: 1440185, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39114123

RESUMO

Introduction: Globally, up to 76.6% of the population may be affected by vitamin D (VD) deficiency, which has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. This underscores the importance of further research into VD supplementation, particularly for health care workers, who are at higher risk due to indoor work environments and dietary challenges associated with shift schedules. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with VD deficiency in Mexican health care workers exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from June 2020 to January 2021 among frontline health care workers treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Blood samples were collected to measure 25-hydroxy VD levels via radioimmunoassay. We also assessed previous COVID-19 infection and comorbidities that could influence VD levels. Results: The study included 468 health care workers. The median serum VD concentration was 16.6 ng/mL. VD deficiency was found in 69.4% (n = 325) of participants, while only 5.1% (n = 24) had normal levels. Those with type 2 diabetes (13.3 ng/mL vs. 17.1 ng/mL) or obesity (15.7 ng/mL vs. 17.1 ng/mL) had significantly lower VD levels than their counterparts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). No significant differences were found among participants with high blood pressure. Multivariate analysis revealed that type 2 diabetes was independently associated with VD deficiency. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of VD deficiency among health care workers, which is potentially linked to both personal health factors and occupational conditions.

2.
Front Nutr ; 10: 1268347, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38024354

RESUMO

Introduction: Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is common in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because of multiple factors. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it increased because of medicine shortage and no enough medical service for patients with non-COVID-19 diseases. Objective: To analyze the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic-related lockdown on the serum levels and status of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-[OH]D) in children with CKD. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients (6-18 years old) who were diagnosed with CKD stage 2-5 and routinely measured for serum VD levels between May 2019 and December 2022. Serum 25-(OH)D levels were measured before, during, and after the pandemic (2019, 2020-2021, and 2022, respectively). The daily dose of cholecalciferol supplementation and the readjustment (if required) were recorded. Results: This study included 171 patients (median age: 12 years). Before the pandemic, the median serum VD level was 25.0 ng/mL (19.3% VD deficiency). Then, VD supplementation was adjusted to 400-1,200 UI daily in 98.8% (n = 169) of patients. During the pandemic, the median VD level decreased to 22.5 ng/mL (43.3% VD deficiency). Hence, the supplementation was readjusted, and after the pandemic, the level was 28.7 ng/mL (18.7% VD deficiency), indicating a statistically significant increase in serum VD levels from the prepandemic period (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Decreased serum VD levels and increased VD deficiency frequency were observed in patients with CKD during the COVID-19 but improved after readjustment of supplementation.

3.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 61(4): 409-411, 2023 Jul 31.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535955

RESUMO

We thank the group headed by Jorge Valencia Alonso for taking the time to review in detail and prepare the letter about our article entitled: " Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on COVID-19 elaborated by staff of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social", which has recently been published in the Medical Journal of the Mexican Social Security Institute. Based on your observations and comments, we allow ourselves to make the following clarifications following the same sequence of your letter to the Editor.


Agradecemos al grupo encabezado por Jorge Valencia Alonso por tomarse el tiempo para revisar con detalle y elaborar la carta sobre nuestro artículo titulado: "Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones científicas sobre COVID-19 por personal del IMSS", que recientemente se ha publicado en la Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. De acuerdo con sus observaciones y comentarios, nos permitimos realizar las siguientes aclaraciones siguiendo la misma secuencia de su carta al Editor.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , México , Previdência Social , Academias e Institutos , Bibliometria
4.
Front Pediatr ; 11: 1167871, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37274824

RESUMO

Introduction: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (MIS-C), a novel hyperinflammatory condition secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, is associated with severe outcomes such as coronary artery aneurysm and death. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study including eight centers in Mexico, aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with MIS-C. Patient data were evaluated using latent class analysis (LCA) to categorize patients into three phenotypes: toxic shock syndrome-like (TSSL)-MIS-C, Kawasaki disease-like (KDL)-MIS-C, and nonspecific MIS-C (NS-MIS-C). Risk factors for adverse outcomes were estimated using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Results: The study included 239 patients with MIS-C, including 61 (26%), 70 (29%), and 108 (45%) patients in the TSSL-MIS-C, KDL-MIS-C, and NS-MIS-C groups, respectively. Fifty-four percent of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 42%, 78%, and 41% received intravenous immunoglobulin, systemic glucocorticoids, and anticoagulants, respectively. Coronary artery dilatation and aneurysms were found in 5.7% and 13.2% of the patients in whom coronary artery diameter was measured, respectively. Any cause in-hospital mortality was 5.4%. Hospitalization after ten days of symptoms was associated with coronary artery abnormalities (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.0). Age ≥10 years (OR: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.4-2.04), severe underlying condition (OR: 9.3, 95% CI: 2.8-31.0), platelet count <150,000 /mm3 (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.7), international normalized ratio >1.2 (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.05-13.9), and serum ferritin concentration >1,500 mg/dl at admission (OR: 52, 95% CI: 5.9-463) were risk factors for death. Discussion: Mortality in patients with MIS-C was higher than reported in other series, probably because of a high rate of cases with serious underlying diseases.

5.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1120445, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967775

RESUMO

Background: Adipokines are associated with cardiovascular disease; in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients adipokines could be useful prognostic factors. Objectives: To explore whether leptin and adiponectin in kidney replacement therapy (KRT) children could have a role on their cardiac function, in the long-term. Design: Prospective cohort study was performed with pediatric KRT patients, aged 8 to 17 years who were undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. At enrollment, lipid profile, adipokines (leptin, leptin receptor, free leptin, and adiponectin), anthropometric measurements and cardiological evaluation were determined. At two-year follow-up, a new cardiological evaluation was performed. Statistical analysis: Quantitative data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared were used for the between-group comparison. Multivariate analyzes were performed to determine the association of adipokines levels with ventricular ejection fraction (LEVF). Results: We included 56 patients, with a median age of 12.5 years. In the first cardiological evaluation, median LVEF was 70.0% (IQR 61%, 76%), 20 patients (35.7%) had some cardiovascular condition, and 10 (17.8%) altered LVEF. At 24-month follow-up, the median LVEF was 70.5% (IQR 65.1%, 77%), while the delta-LVEF values was 3% (IQR -6.5%, 7%). Delta-LVEF were correlated with baseline adipokines serum levels, and the only positive correlation found was with free leptin (r=0.303, p=0.025). In multivariate analysis, levels of free leptin (Coef. 0.12, p<0.036) and leptin (coef. 1.72, p=0.049), as well as baseline LVEF (Coef. -0.65, p<0.001) were associated with delta-LVEF. Conclusions: Free leptin, leptin and LVEF at the beginning of follow-up were associated with the LVEF decrease at the 24-month follow-up in KRT children.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Criança , Adipocinas , Leptina , Adiponectina , Estudos Prospectivos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico
6.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1101399, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36967781

RESUMO

Objective: To determine if the leptin, adiponectin, and leptin/adiponectin ratio (LAR) can predict weight gain at the end of GnRH analogs (GnRHa) treatment in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP). Material and methods: Study design: prospective cohort. Serum levels of leptin and adiponectin were determined at diagnosis of CPP. Anthropometry was performed at diagnosis of CPP and every six-months, until treatment with GnRHa was discontinued and they presented menarche. Patients were divided according to BMI<94 and BMI>95 percentile at diagnosis of CPP. The outcome was the increased in weight gain (e.g., from normal weight to overweight) at the end of follow-up. Statistical analysis: repeated measures ANOVA test and Student's t-test were used to compare groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of leptin and adiponectin levels, as well as LAR values with increased weight gain. Results: Fifty-six CPP patients were studied, 18 had BMI >95 percentile and 38 BMI <94 percentile. Of the 18 patients who initially had BMI >95th, two patients went from obesity to overweight, while among the 38 patients who started with BMI <94th, 21 (55.2%) increased their weight gain at the end of follow-up. This last group had higher leptin levels (8.99 ± 0.6 vs 6.14 ± 0.8, p=0.005) and higher LAR values compared to those who remained in the same weight (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 0.96 ± 0.56, p=0.01). In the logistic regression analysis, it was found that higher leptin levels and higher LAR values were associated with increased weight gain (RR 1.31, 95%CI 1.03-1.66, RR 4.86, 95%CI 1.10-21.51, respectively), regardless of birth weight, pubertal stage, age, and bone/chronological age ratio. Conclusions: In patients with CPP, leptin levels and higher LAR values appear to be associated with significantly greater weight gain during GhRHa treatment, particularly in girls starting with BMI < 94 percentile.


Assuntos
Leptina , Puberdade Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Puberdade Precoce/complicações , Adiponectina , Prognóstico , Sobrepeso/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Aumento de Peso
7.
Pediatr Int ; 64(1): e15183, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36348518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with pubertal disorders (PD) in adolescent boys is limited as few studies have explored this disorder. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of assessing hormonal parameters in male adolescents with CKD and their correlation with PD in a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among male adolescents with CKD (stages IV and V). Data regarding the age at puberty onset were collected from the patients' clinical records and through interview. The patients were followed up for 12 months during their pubertal development. At the beginning, routine hormonal profile tests were performed to examine the patients' thyroid profile, prolactin levels, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone, leptin, and receptor leptin. The hormonal profiles of patients with and without PD were compared. Comparisons between the groups were performed using the Student t-test and Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Data of 64 patients (26/64 with PD) were analyzed. The median age was 15 years and the median time for CKD evolution was 11 months. No differences between groups were noted in the general or biochemical characteristics of the patients. The hormonal parameters, prolactin levels were higher and the free leptin and free thyroxine levels were lower in patients with PD. Leptin receptor levels of >0.90 ng/mL (risk ratio [RR], 8.6; P = 0.004) and hyperprolactinemia (RR, 21.3; P = 0.049) were the risk factors for PD. CONCLUSIONS: Leptin receptor levels of >0.90 ng/mL and hyperprolactinemia are associated with the development of PD in male adolescents with CKD.


Assuntos
Hiperprolactinemia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Receptores para Leptina , Prolactina , Leptina , Hiperprolactinemia/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Puberdade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações
8.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 912784, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35967584

RESUMO

Background: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 is broad, from asymptomatic to severe cases and death. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical course of patients attended during the first months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a third-level pediatric hospital. Methods: Design: prospective cohort study. Patients with viral respiratory disease or suspected cases of COVID-19 were evaluated at the Pediatric Hospital, National Medical Center XXI Century, Mexico City, from 21 March 2020 to 13 January 2021. Statistical analysis: Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for comparisons; a logistic regression model was constructed to identify clinical or laboratory characteristics associated with critical disease. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 697 patients met the operational definition of viral respiratory disease or suspected cases of COVID-19 and underwent real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 testing. Patients with a positive result were included. Of the 181 patients (26%), 121 (66.8%) had mild disease and were treated as outpatients and 60 (33.1%) were hospitalized. A total of six patients met the criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Of the 60 inpatients, 65% were males, and 82% had one or more comorbidities. The main comorbidities were cancer (42%) and overweight (15%). The median hospital stay was 9 days. The inpatients had a higher frequency of fever, general malaise, dyspnea, chills, polypnea, and cyanosis than the outpatients (p < 0.05). Only 21.4% of the outpatients had one or more comorbidities, which were lower than in the hospitalized patients (p < 0.001). Laboratory data at admission were similar between critically ill and those with moderate and severe disease. The patients who developed pneumonia were at higher risk of critical disease, while older age was associated with a better prognosis. A total of 13 of the 60 inpatients died (mortality 7.1%). All but one had one or more comorbidities: four had cancer, four congenital heart disease, one chronic kidney disease and epilepsy, one Epstein-Barr virus-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, one obesity, and one diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: Hospital mortality is high, especially in children with comorbidities. Despite 2 years having passed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the epidemiological and clinical data on children are still helpful to improve their prognosis.

9.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 943529, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35958172

RESUMO

Background: Some studies suggested that adequate levels of vitamin D (VD) decrease the risk of severe COVID-19. Information about the effectiveness of VD supplementation in children is scarce. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of VD supplementation compared to the standard of care in hospitalized children with COVID-19. Patients and methods: An open-label randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial was carried out. We included patients from 1 month to 17 years, with moderate COVID-19, who required hospitalization and supplemental oxygen. They were randomized into two groups: the VD group, which received doses of 1,000 (children < 1 year) or 2,000 IU/day (from 1 to 17 years) and the group without VD (control). The outcome variables were the progression of oxygen requirement, the development of complications, and death. Statistical analysis: For comparison between groups, we used the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From 24 March 2020 to 31 March 2021, 87 patients were eligible to participate in the trial; 45 patients were randomized: 20 to the VD group and 25 to the control group. There was no difference in general characteristics at baseline, including serum VD levels (median 13.8 ng/ml in the VD group and 11.4 ng/ml in the control group). Outcomes: 2/20 (10%) in the VD group vs. 9/25 (36%) in the control group progressed to a superior ventilation modality (p = 0.10); one patient in the VD group died (5%) compared to 6 (24%) patients in the control group (p = 0.23). ARR was 26% (95% CI 8.8 to 60.2%) and NNT was 3 (2 to 11) for progression and ARR was 19% (95% CI -3.9 to 42.8%) and NNT was 6 (2 to 26) for death. None of the patients receiving VD had adverse effects. The trial was stopped for ethical reasons; since after receiving the results of the basal VD values, none of the patients had normal levels. Conclusion: In this trial, VD supplementation in pediatric patients seems to decrease the risk of COVID-19 progression and death. More studies are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical Trial Registration: This protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT04502667.

10.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 60(Suppl 2): 77-85, 2022 12 19.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795975

RESUMO

Background: Since the beginning of the pandemic, new knowledge about COVID-19 obtained by research has been disseminated in medical and scientific journals, but the large number of publications that have been generated in such a short time has been impressive. Objective: To perform a bibliometric analysis of the published articles in medical-scientific journals carried-out by the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) personnel on COVID-19. Material and methods: Systematic review of the literature, identifying the publications included in the PubMed and EMBASE databases, up to September 2022. Articles on COVID-19 were included, in which at least one author had IMSS affiliation; there was no restriction on the type of publication, so original articles, review articles, clinical case reports, etc. were included. The analysis was descriptive. Results: 588 abstracts were obtained, of which 533 full length articles met the selection criteria. Most were research articles (48%), followed by review articles. Mainly clinical or epidemiological aspects were addressed. They were published in 232 different journals, with a predominance of foreign journals (91.8%). Around half of the publications were carried out by IMSS personnel together with authors from other institutions, national or foreign. Conclusions: The scientific contributions prepared by IMSS personnel have contributed to understanding clinical, epidemiological and basic aspects of COVID-19, which has had an impact on improving the quality of care for its beneficiaries.


Introducción: desde el inicio de la pandemia los nuevos conocimientos sobre COVID-19 han sido difundidos en revistas médico-científicas, y ha sido impresionante la gran cantidad de publicaciones que se ha generado en tan poco tiempo. Objetivo: realizar un análisis bibliométrico de los artículos publicados en revistas médico-científicas elaborados por personal del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) sobre COVID-19. Material y métodos: revisión sistemática de la literatura, identificando las publicaciones incluidas en las bases de datos PubMed y EMBASE, hasta septiembre de 2022. Se incluyeron los artículos sobre COVID-19 en los que al menos un autor tuviera adscripción IMSS, sin restricción del tipo de publicación, por lo que se incluyeron artículos originales, de revisión, reportes de casos clínicos, etc. El análisis fue de tipo descriptivo. Resultados: se obtuvieron 588 resúmenes, de los cuales 533 artículos cumplieron con los criterios de selección. La mayoría correspondió a artículos de investigación y revisión. Principalmente se abordaron aspectos clínicos o epidemiológicos. Se publicaron en 232 revistas diferentes, predominando revistas extranjeras (91.8%). Alrededor de la mitad de las publicaciones fueron realizadas por personal del IMSS en conjunto con autores de otras instituciones, nacionales o extranjeras. Conclusiones: las aportaciones científicas elaboradas por personal del IMSS han contribuido a conocer aspectos clínicos, epidemiológicos y básicos sobre COVID-19, lo cual ha impactado en la mejora de la calidad de atención de sus derechohabientes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Bibliometria , Academias e Institutos , México/epidemiologia , Previdência Social
11.
Indian J Pediatr ; 89(7): 651-656, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34677802

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the frequency of asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 in pediatric patients undergoing invasive medical procedures in a tertiary pediatric hospital. METHODS: From June to October 2020, a SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test was performed for all pediatric patients scheduled to undergo an elective invasive procedure. None of the patients was symptomatic. The cycle threshold (Ct) values of the ORF1ab gene were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 700 patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 5.7 y old. In total, 46.6% (n = 326) of the patients were male, and 53.4% (n = 374) were female. The most common underlying diseases were hemato-oncological (25.3%), gastrointestinal (24.9%), and genitourinary (10.3%). The main scheduled surgical-medical procedures were surgical treatment for acquired congenital diseases, biopsy sampling, local therapy administration, organ transplantation, and the placement of central venous catheters, among others. The SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test was positive in 9.4% (66), and the median Ct value was 35.8. None of the patients developed COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in less than 10% of pediatric patients scheduled to undergo an elective invasive procedure in a tertiary hospital. This frequency is higher than those in reports from different countries.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Assintomáticas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 68(4): 291-299, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34904564

RESUMO

In developing a research protocol, authors must consider the possible errors that may occur throughout the study. In clinical research, two types of biases are recognized: random errors and systematic errors; the latter are called biases. To date, dozens of biases have been described, which is why the purpose of this article is to describe the main biases that can occur in clinical research studies, as well as strategies to avoid them or to minimize their effects. Since there are several classifications, in order to provide a more practical overview in this review, the biases are grouped into three types: selection biases, information (or performance) biases, and confounding biases. In addition, to make it even more specific, we describe the biases considering the purpose of the research: prognosis, therapeutics, causality, and diagnostic test studies.


En la elaboración de un protocolo de investigación, los autores deben tomar en cuenta los posibles errores que puedan ocurrir a lo largo del estudio. En la investigación clínica se reconocen dos tipos: los errores aleatorios y los errores sistemáticos, estos últimos se denominan sesgos. A la fecha se han descrito decenas de sesgos, por lo que este artículo tiene como objetivo describir los principales sesgos que pueden ocurrir en los estudios de investigación clínica, así como la forma para evitarlos o minimizar sus efectos. En virtud de que existen varias clasificaciones, en la presente revisión y, a fin de disponer un panorama más práctico, los sesgos se agrupan en tres: sesgos de selección, sesgos de información (o ejecución) y sesgos de confusión. Además, para una descripción más específica, se toma en cuenta el propósito del estudio: pronóstico, terapéutica, causalidad y la evaluación de una prueba diagnóstica.


Assuntos
Viés , Causalidade , Humanos
13.
Nutr Res Pract ; 15(Suppl 1): S32-S40, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34909131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Considering the high number of deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Latin American countries, together with multiple factors that increase the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, we aimed to determine 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels and its association with mortality in patients with critical COVID-19. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including adult patients with critical COVID-19. Data, including clinical characteristics and 25(OH)D levels measured at the time of intensive care unit admission, were collected. All patients were followed until hospital discharge or in-hospital death. The patients were divided into those surviving and deceased patient groups, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of in hospital mortality. RESULTS: The entire cohort comprised 94 patients with critical COVID-19 (males, 59.6%; median age, 61.5 years). The median 25(OH)D level was 12.7 ng/mL, and 15 (16%) and 79 (84%) patients had vitamin D insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency, respectively. The median serum 25(OH)D level was significantly lower in deceased patients compared with surviving (12.1 vs. 18.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency was present in 100% of the deceased patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, body mass index, other risk factors, and 25(OH)D level were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency was present in 84% of critical COVID-19 patients. Serum 25(OH)D was independently associated with mortality in critical patients with COVID-19.

14.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 68(2): 128-136, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34525784

RESUMO

Informing in the studies about the effect size of an intervention or the impact of the factor(s) about an outcome, allows better decision-making for the application of the results in clinical practice. This article presents different methods to analyze the effect size, which can be through direct or indirect statistical methods. Within the direct methods, there's the difference in means between groups and the difference of absolute or relative frequencies. Among the indirect methods, Cohen's "d" family (which are based on standard deviation values), the "r and R2" family, measures of association (e.g. OR, RR, HR), and impact measures (e.g. NNT) are shown. The decision to use any of these methods depends on the objectives of the study and the measuring scale that is used to assess the results, as well as the data distribution. In order to enhance the understanding of the methods described in this article, examples are included, and the need to include level of precision (e.g. confidence intervals) is highlighted, along with the clinical decision thresholds for a better interpretation.


Informar en los estudios sobre el tamaño del efecto de una intervención o del impacto de factor(es) sobre un desenlace, permite tomar mejores decisiones para la aplicación de los resultados a la práctica clínica. En este artículo se presenta la manera de analizar el tamaño del efecto, lo cual puede ser mediante métodos estadísticos directos o indirectos. Dentro de los métodos directos, se encuentra la diferencia de promedios entre grupos y la diferencia de frecuencias absolutas o relativas. Dentro de los métodos indirectos se muestran los índices de la familia de "d" de Cohen (que se basan en valores de desviación estándar), la familia de "r y R2", medidas de asociación (RM, RR, HR) e impacto (NNT). La decisión del uso de cualquiera de los métodos descritos, depende de los objetivos del estudio, la escala de medición usada para evaluar los resultados y la distribución de los datos. Para facilitar la comprensión, se incluyen ejemplos y se resalta la necesidad de incluir los diferentes estadísticos con su nivel de precisión (ej. intervalos de confianza), junto con los umbrales clínicos de decisión, a fin de mejorar su interpretación.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados , Humanos
15.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 68(1): 65-75, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148329

RESUMO

The practice of evidence-based medicine includes the critical analysis of clinical research studies, and, within it, the interpretation of the results reported. In addition, to statistical data, there are estimators that can help clinicians transfer research findings to routine clinical practice. These estimators are measures of risk, association, and impact. Risk measures report current uncertainty or probability (prevalence of a disease, sensitivity, specificity) or for future events (cumulative incidence, incidence density). Measures of association are related to the identification of the risk in order to determine whether certain factors increase or decrease the probability of development of a disease (relative risk, odds ratio, hazard ratio). While measures of impact allow, among other things, to estimate the effect of a treatment (relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat). In this review, each of these estimators is described, defined, and presented with examples.


Parte del ejercicio de la medicina basada en evidencia incluye el análisis crítico de los estudios de investigación clínica y dentro de este, la interpretación de los resultados presentados. Además de los datos estadísticos, existen estimadores que pueden ayudar a los clínicos a trasladar los hallazgos de las investigaciones a la práctica clínica habitual. Estos estimadores son las medidas de riesgo, asociación e impacto. Las medidas de riesgo informan sobre la incertidumbre o probabilidad en el presente (prevalencia de una enfermedad, sensibilidad, especificidad) o para eventos futuros (incidencia acumulada, densidad de incidencia). Las medidas de asociación se relacionan con la identificación del riesgo para determinar si ciertos factores aumentan o disminuyen la probabilidad del desarrollo de una enfermedad (riesgo relativo, razón de momios, cociente de riesgo). Mientras que las medidas de impacto permiten, entre otros, estimar el efecto de un tratamiento (reducción del riesgo relativo, reducción del riesgo absoluto, número necesario por tratar). En esta revisión se describen, definen y presentan ejemplos de cada uno de estos estimadores.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Incidência , Razão de Chances , Risco
16.
J Ophthalmol ; 2021: 2169571, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33815834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Falls are a significant public health problem among older people worldwide. The aim was to perform a new systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether cataract surgery is effective in reducing the rate of falls in older persons. METHODS: The systematic review was performed following the recommendations by the Cochrane Collaboration. Original papers were included with RCT or quasi-experimental design, which described the effect on uni- or bilateral cataract surgery on the rate of falls among people aged 60 or older. Titles and abstracts were reviewed, full-text versions were retrieved, and two independent examiners reviewed them to assess inclusion criteria. All relevant variables were synthesised in an evidence table. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed pooling the trials, and results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The initial search reported 99 potential abstracts, and 41 full-text versions were examined. In the end, eight studies were included. Five included patients 65 years of age and older, two patients 55 years and older, and one included patients 50 years or older. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant were performed in all studies. Two were RCT, and six were quasi-experimental. Falls was the main outcome. The six quasi-experimental studies reported that a reduction in the frequency of falls was observed (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96), although heterogeneity was significant (I 2 = 74%). Only one RCT reported risk reduction of 34% (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence that the first cataract surgery reduces the frequency of falls in older people with bilateral cataracts, but a second surgery does not have significant impact.

17.
Bol. méd. Hosp. Infant. Méx ; 78(2): 123-129, Mar.-Apr. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1249117

RESUMO

Abstract Background: This study describes 35 years of experience in a tertiary care level hospital that treats cardiac patients with univentricular heart physiology who underwent Glenn surgery. Methods: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Glenn surgery, including variables related to pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative morbidity and mortality. Results: From 1980 to 2015, 204 Glenn surgeries were performed. The most common heart disease was tricuspid atresia IB (19.2%). In 48.1% of the cases, the procedure was performed with antegrade flow. A bilateral Glenn procedure was performed in 12.5% of the cases and 10.3% were carried out without using a cardiopulmonary bypass pump. Reported complications included infections, bleeding, arrhythmias, chylothorax, neurological alterations, and pleural effusion. The mortality rate was 2.9% Conclusions: Glenn surgery is a palliative surgery with good results. It significantly improves patient quality of life over a long period until a total cavopulmonary shunt is performed. The complications observed are few, and the mortality rate is low. Therefore, it is a safe surgery that should be used for univentricular congenital heart disease.


Resumen Introducción: El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir la experiencia de 35 años en un hospital de tercer nivel con pacientes cardiópatas con fisiología univentricular que fueron sometidos a cirugía de Glenn. Métodos: Se presenta un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de Glenn. Se incluyeron variables relacionadas con la morbilidad y la mortalidad preoperatorias, transoperatorias y posoperatorias. Resultados: Desde 1980 hasta 2015 se realizaron 204 cirugías de Glenn para la corrección de cardiopatías. De ellas, la más frecuente fue la atresia tricuspídea IB (19.2%); en el 48.1% se realizó Glenn con flujo anterógrado, en el 12.5% Glenn bilateral y el 10.3% de las cirugías fueron sin apoyo de bomba de circulación extracorpórea. Las complicaciones reportadas fueron infecciones, sangrado, arritmias, quilotórax, alteraciones neurológicas y derrame pleural. La mortalidad fue del 2.9%. Conclusiones: La cirugía de Glenn es un procedimiento paliativo que se ha utilizado con buenos resultados. Mejora en forma importante la calidad de vida del paciente durante un largo periodo mientras que se realiza la derivación cavopulmonar total. Presenta pocas complicaciones y muy baja mortalidad, por lo que es una cirugía segura que debe ser utilizada para cardiopatías congénitas univentriculares.


Assuntos
Humanos , Derivação Cardíaca Direita , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Artéria Pulmonar , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia
18.
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex ; 78(2): 123-129, 2021 01 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study describes 35 years of experience in a tertiary care level hospital that treats cardiac patients with univentricular heart physiology who underwent Glenn surgery. METHODS: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Glenn surgery, including variables related to pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: From 1980 to 2015, 204 Glenn surgeries were performed. The most common heart disease was tricuspid atresia IB (19.2%). In 48.1% of the cases, the procedure was performed with antegrade flow. A bilateral Glenn procedure was performed in 12.5% of the cases and 10.3% were carried out without using a cardiopulmonary bypass pump. Reported complications included infections, bleeding, arrhythmias, chylothorax, neurological alterations, and pleural effusion. The mortality rate was 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Glenn surgery is a palliative surgery with good results. It significantly improves patient quality of life over a long period until a total cavopulmonary shunt is performed. The complications observed are few, and the mortality rate is low. Therefore, it is a safe surgery that should be used for univentricular congenital heart disease.


Assuntos
Derivação Cardíaca Direita , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Humanos , Artéria Pulmonar , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Rev Alerg Mex ; 67(2): 165-173, 2020.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32892530

RESUMO

Diagnostic tests make it possible to determine whether a person has a disease or not. Before incorporating a new diagnostic test in the clinical setting, it is necessary to define its validity through its indicators of performance, sensitivity, and specificity. In these studies, like in any research, the results might not be reliable when there are biases during their execution. This article entails the discussion about the biases in diagnostic test studies that may cause inaccuracy in sensitivity and specificity. The main biases that affect the validity of these studies are: incorporation bias, partial and/or differential verification bias, an imperfect reference standard, a limited spectrum of the disease, and the ambiguous results of the test to be validated. In addition, examples of how these biases impact on the results of sensitivity and specificity are given in this paper.


Las pruebas de diagnóstico permiten determinar si una persona tiene o no una enfermedad. Para incorporar una nueva prueba de diagnóstico en el ámbito clínico primero es necesario definir su validez a través de sus indicadores de desempeño, sensibilidad y especificidad. Como en cualquier investigación, en este tipo de estudios es posible que los resultados no sean confiables cuando hay sesgos durante su ejecución. En este artículo se discuten los sesgos en estudios de prueba diagnóstica que pueden ocasionar que la sensibilidad y especificidad no sean correctas. Los principales sesgos que afectan la validez en estos estudios son el sesgo de incorporación, la verificación parcial o diferencial, un estándar de oro imperfecto, un espectro limitado de la enfermedad y los resultados ambiguos de la prueba por validar. Además, en este artículo se dan ejemplos de cómo impactan estos sesgos en la sensibilidad y especificidad.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Viés , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Humanos
20.
J Pediatr ; 224: 186, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504619
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA