RESUMO

Resumen La coartación de aorta es una cardiopatía congénita frecuente y potencialmente mortal. Su diagnóstico prenatal es un reto, ya que está dificultado por características inherentes a la circulación fetal, siendo relativamente bajas sus tasas de detección (30-50%). A diferencia de lo que sucede con otras cardiopatías congénitas, el diagnóstico prenatal de la coartación de aorta es en la mayoría de los casos solo de sospecha y únicamente podrá confirmarse de forma posnatal. Su identificación es de gran importancia, ya que mejora el pronóstico neonatal, y se basa sobre todo en la visualización de signos indirectos, como asimetría de cavidades o grandes vasos, con dominancia derecha. La principal limitación de estos es su bajo valor predictivo positivo, en especial en edades gestacionales tardías. Existen otros signos directos con mayor especificidad, como la hipoplasia de arco, el cociente istmo/ductus o el shelf contraductal, que en ocasiones solo son evidentes en el tercer trimestre dado el carácter evolutivo de la enfermedad. No obstante, ningún parámetro aislado presenta un rendimiento diagnóstico adecuado, siendo la combinación de algunos en distintos modelos multiparamétricos la que ha presentado mejores valores predictivos. Estos permiten al clínico un mejor asesoramiento a los padres, así como una planificación de la asistencia perinatal.

Abstract Coarctation of the aorta is a relatively common and potentially fatal congenital cardiac defect. Prenatal diagnosis remains a challenge, as it is limited by the inherent characteristics of the fetal circulation, with overall low detection rates (30-50%). Opposite to other congenital cardiac defects, prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta will be a suspicion one and can only be confirmed postnatally. Its identification is of paramount importance as it improves neonatal prognosis and is mainly based on the identification of indirect signs such as cardiac or great vessels asymmetry with right dominance. The main limitation of these signs is their low positive predictive value, especially in later gestational ages. There are direct signs with higher specificity such as arch hypoplasia, the isthmus/ductus ratio or the contraductal shelf, which may only be apparent in the third trimester given the progressive nature of the disease. However, no isolated parameter has an adequate diagnostic performance and it is their combination in multiparametric models that has shown the best predictive values. These models allow clinicians to give parents better counselling as well as tailor perinatal management.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has still to be ascertained whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in pregnancy is associated with worse maternal and fetal outcomes compared to low risk gestations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes in high- and low-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multinational retrospective cohort study involving women with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from 76 centers from 25 countries in Europe, the United States, South America, Asia, and Australia from April 4, 2020, to October 28, 2020. The primary outcome was a composite measure of maternal mortality and morbidity, including admission to the intensive care unit, use of mechanical ventilation, or death. The secondary outcome was a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome, including miscarriage, fetal loss, neonatal and perinatal death, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. All outcomes were assessed in high- and low-risk pregnancies. Pregnancies were considered high risk in case of either preexisting chronic medical conditions in pregnancy or obstetrical disorders occurring in pregnancy. The Fisher exact test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 887 singleton pregnancies who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens were included in the study. The risk of composite adverse maternal outcomes was higher in high-risk pregnancies than in low-risk pregnancies (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.24; P=.035). In addition, women carrying high-risk pregnancies were at higher risk of hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.04; P=.002), presence of severe respiratory symptoms (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-3.21; P=.001), admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-4.88), and invasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-5.94; P=.002). When exploring perinatal outcomes, high-risk pregnancies were at high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-2.72; P=.009). However, such association was mainly because of the higher incidence of miscarriage in high-risk pregnancies compared with that in low-risk pregnancies (5.3% vs 1.6%, P=.008); furthermore, there was no difference in other explored outcomes between the 2 study groups. At logistic regression analysis, maternal age (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22; P=.023) and high-risk pregnancy (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% confidence interval, 3.90-5.11; P<.001) were independently associated with adverse maternal outcomes. CONCLUSION: High-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were at higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes than low-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

Assuntos