RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Technical variations of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may influence the incidence of complications such as fistulas, marginal ulcers, stenosis, and internal hernias. METHODS: We described the technical aspects of a retrocolic, retrogastric, laparoscopic gastric bypass procedure with manual gastrojejunostomy and the closure technique for the three mesenteric defects generated by the Roux-en-Y limb reconstruction. RESULTS: We summarized the data from 587 patients concerning complications directly related to the surgical technique. There were no internal hernias in patients followed, and in only 2 cases, small bowel obstruction related to defect closure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The retrocolic, retrogastric gastric bypass performed with a meticulous closure of all three mesenteric defects reflects a low incidence of internal hernias and low complication rates related to the closure itself. The technique also allows less tension at the gastrojejunostomy.
Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Anastomose em-Y de Roux , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic varies greatly and has different dynamics in every country, city, and hospital in Latin America. Obesity increases the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it is one of the independent risk factors for the most severe cases of COVID-19. Currently, the most effective treatment against obesity available is bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS), which further resolves or improves other independent risk factors like diabetes and hypertension. OBJECTIVE: Provide recommendations for the resumption of elective BMS during COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This document was created by the IFSO-LAC Executive Board and a task force. Based on data collected from a survey distributed to all IFSO-LAC members that obtained 540 responses, current evidence available, and consensus reached by other scientific societies. RESULTS: The resumption of elective BMS must be a priority maybe similar to oncological surgery, when hospitals reach phase I or II, treating obesity patients in a NON-COVID area, avoiding inadvertent intrahospital contagion from healthcare provider, patients, and relatives. Same BMS indication and types of procedures as before the pandemic. Discard the presence of SARS-CoV-2 within 72 h prior to surgery. Continues laparoscopic approach. The entire team use N95 mask. Minimum hospital stays. Implement remote visits for the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Resumption of elective BMS is crucial because it is not only a weight loss operation but also resolves or improves comorbidities and appears to be an immune restorative procedure of obese patients in the medium term, offering them the same probability of contracting COVID-19 as the regular population.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Humanos , América Latina , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Prioritizing surgical procedures aims at facilitating patient's access according to the clinical needs, maximizing access equity, and minimizing the damage from delayed access. Previous categorization of elective bariatric surgery have been adapted to define an objective prioritizing system that reflects those principles for bariatric and metabolic operations. Given the factors that contribute to the morbidity and mortality of obese and type 2 diabetes patients, surgical prioritization should be based on clinical risk stratification. For patients with type 2 diabetes, we suggest that the operation may be prioritized for those with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in a relatively short term. Likewise, it is necessary to guide the surgical team regarding the necessary care both in the pre, per and postoperative periods of bariatric and metabolic surgery. These recommendations aim to reduce the risk of in-hospital contamination of the surgical team among health professionals and between health professionals and patients. In summary, these recommendations have been shaped after a thorough analysis of the available literature and are extremely important to mitigate the harm related to the clinical complications of obesity and its comorbidities while keeping healthcare providers' and patients' safety.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Brasil , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Guias como Assunto , Prioridades em Saúde , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
ABSTRACT Prioritizing surgical procedures aims at facilitating patient's access according to the clinical needs, maximizing access equity, and minimizing the damage from delayed access. Previous categorization of elective bariatric surgery have been adapted to define an objective prioritizing system that reflects those principles for bariatric and metabolic operations. Given the factors that contribute to the morbidity and mortality of obese and type 2 diabetes patients, surgical prioritization should be based on clinical risk stratification. For patients with type 2 diabetes, we suggest that the operation may be prioritized for those with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in a relatively short term. Likewise, it is necessary to guide the surgical team regarding the necessary care both in the pre, per and postoperative periods of bariatric and metabolic surgery. These recommendations aim to reduce the risk of in-hospital contamination of the surgical team among health professionals and between health professionals and patients. In summary, these recommendations have been shaped after a thorough analysis of the available literature and are extremely important to mitigate the harm related to the clinical complications of obesity and its comorbidities while keeping healthcare providers' and patients' safety.
RESUMO A priorização de qualquer operação eletiva visa facilitar o acesso do paciente de acordo com as necessidades clínicas, maximizando a equidade de acesso e minimizando os danos causados pelo atraso. As categorias de operações eletivas foram adaptadas para definir sistema de priorização objetiva que reflete esses princípios para operações bariátricas e metabólicas. Em razão dos fatores que contribuem para a morbidade e mortalidade da obesidade e do diabetes tipo 2, a priorização cirúrgica deve ser baseada na estratificação de risco clínico. Para pacientes com diabetes tipo 2, sugerimos que a operação possa ser priorizada para aqueles com maior risco de morbidade e mortalidade, em prazo relativamente curto. Da mesma forma, é necessário orientar a equipe cirúrgica quanto aos cuidados necessários tanto no pré, per e pós-operatório da cirurgia bariátrica e metabólica. As recomendações visam reduzir o risco de contágio hospitalar da equipe cirúrgica tanto entre profissionais de saúde quanto entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes. Em resumo, estas recomendações foram moldadas após análise minuciosa da literatura disponível e são extremamente importantes para mitigar os danos das complicações clínicas, sensíveis a doença obesidade e comorbidades, mantendo a segurança dos profissionais de saúde e dos pacientes.