RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of healthy surgical candidates who underwent percutaneous thermoablation (TA) as a first-line therapy for small renal masses (T1a). METHODS: The institutional review board approved this bi-institutional retrospective study of 85 consecutive surgical candidates with 97 biopsy-proven malignant renal masses (T1a) treated with percutaneous TA from 2008 to 2016. The LTPFS, MFS, CSS and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Descriptive analysis was also performed. RESULTS: The median tumour size was 2.3 cm (range, 0.7-3.9 cm). The minimal and mean follow-up periods were 24 and 56 months, respectively. Local recurrence was detected in four patients (4.7%) at 8.5, 13.8, 58.0 and 64.0 months of follow-up and retreated successfully with percutaneous TA. No patient developed metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and none died due to renal oncologic complications. One patient died of heart attack. The 5-year LTPFS, OS, MFS and CSS rates were 93.0%, 98.4%, 100% and 100%, respectively. Only two patients (2.3%) had major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > II), including ureteropelvic junction stenosis and urinary obstruction due to ureteral blood clots. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that percutaneous TA is a feasible and effective first-line therapy for healthy surgical candidates with small renal masses (T1a). The 5-year LTPFS, OS, CSS and MFS rates were 93.0%, 98.4%, 100% and 100%, respectively, with a major complication rate of only 2.3%. KEY POINTS: ⢠Image-guided percutaneous thermoablation of small renal malignancies was effective in 95.3% of the healthy surgical candidates. ⢠Major complications were detected in 2.3% of the patients. ⢠The local tumour progression-free survival rate was 97.6% and 93.0% at 3 and 5 years, respectively.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate and transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx) with visual estimation in early risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with low-risk, low-grade, localised prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled and submitted to a 3-T 16-channel cardiac surface coil mpMRI of the prostate and confirmatory biopsy (CBx), which included a standard biopsy (SBx) and visual estimation-guided TRUS-Bx. Cancer-suspicious regions were defined using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores. Reclassification occurred if CBx confirmed the presence of a Gleason score ≥7, greater than three positive fragments, or ≥50% involvement of any core. The performance of mpMRI for the prediction of CBx results was assessed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to study relationships between age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), number of positive cores in the initial biopsy, and mpMRI grade on CBx reclassification. Our report is consistent with the Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) guidelines. RESULTS: In all, 105 patients were available for analysis in the study. From this cohort, 42 (40%) had PI-RADS 1, 2, or 3 lesions and 63 (60%) had only grade 4 or 5 lesions. Overall, 87 patients underwent visual estimation TRUS-Bx. Reclassification among patients with PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 0%, 23.1%, 9.1%, 74.5%, and 100%, respectively. Overall, mpMRI sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for disease reclassification were 92.5%, 76%, 81%, and 90.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, only PSAD and mpMRI remained significant for reclassification (P < 0.05). In the cross-tabulation, SBx would have missed 15 significant cases detected by targeted biopsy, but SBx did detect five cases of significant cancer not detected by targeted biopsy alone. CONCLUSION: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is a significant tool for predicting cancer severity reclassification on CBx among AS candidates. The reclassification rate on CBx is particularly high in the group of patients who have PI-RADS grades 4 or 5 lesions. Despite the usefulness of visual-guided biopsy, it still remains highly recommended to retrieve standard fragments during CBx in order to avoid missing significant tumours.