Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(2): ofae047, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38370293

RESUMO

Intra-amniotic infection with Candida species is an uncommon but severe condition with high fetal morbimortality and no established clinical guidelines for its management. We report a Candida albicans intra-amniotic infection diagnosed in a 25-week pregnant woman, successfully treated with high-dose liposomal amphotericin B. Pregnancy was prolonged until 30 weeks, and despite persistently positive Candida cultures in amniotic fluid, a healthy newborn was delivered without evidence of systemic infection. Amphotericin concentration was determined at birth, revealing levels over 30 times higher in mother's and cord blood than in the amniotic fluid, probably explaining the clinical protection despite failure in obtaining fungal clearance.

2.
ARS med. (Santiago, En línea) ; 48(3): 62-70, 30 sept. 2023.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1512554

RESUMO

Introducción: vasa previa (VP) corresponde al paso de los vasos umbilicales por las membranas amnióticas, sin protección de gelatina de Wharton o placenta, antes de la presentación fetal, sobre el orificio cervical interno. Pese a su baja incidencia, el diagnóstico prenatal es relevante por las graves consecuencias que puede tener esta patología en caso de no ser diagnosticada. El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar la evidencia disponible para el manejo de embarazadas con diagnóstico antenatal de VP. Materiales y métodos: analizamos todos los estudios publicados (prospectivos, retrospectivos y reporte de casos) entre los años 1999 y 2023, con diagnóstico VP en embarazo único, reportando la edad gestacional de interrupción y el resultado neonatal. Resultados: incluimos 19 investigaciones (18 en la búsqueda primera y una adicional por relevancia). Las pacientes con manejo intrahospitalario desde las 34 semanas tuvieron mayor latencia al parto, mejores resultados neonatales y menor tasa de cesárea de urgencia que las pacientes con manejo ambulatorio. La edad gestacional de interrupción es variable entre los estudios, sin embargo, no se evidenció beneficio de interrupción a las 34 semanas comparado con manejo expectante hasta las 37 semanas de edad gestacional. Conclusión: existiría beneficio de hospitalización entre las 32-34 semanas en mujeres con diagnóstico de VP, siendo razonable la interrupción cercana a las 37 semanas por cesárea electiva.


Introduction: vasa previa (VP) corresponds to the passage of the umbilical vessels through the amniotic membranes, without the protection of Wharton's gelatin or placenta, in front of the fetal presentation, over the internal cervical os. Despite its low incidence, prenatal diagnosis is relevant due to the severe consequences of this pathology if the diagnosis is missed. This review presents the available evidence for pregnant women's management with an antenatal diagnosis of VP. Materials and methods: we analyzed all the studies published (prospective, retrospective, and case reports) between 1999 and 2023, with a diagnosis of VP in a single pregnancy, reporting gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome. Results: We included 19 investigations (18 in the first search and another for relevance). Patients with in-hospital management from 34 weeks had a more extended latency period until delivery, better neonatal outcomes, and a lower rate of emergency cesarean section than patients with outpatient management. The gestational age at birth is variable between the studies; however, no benefit of delivery at 34 weeks was evidenced compared with expectant management until 37 weeks of gestational age. Conclusion: there would be a benefit of hospitalization between 32-34 weeks in women diagnosed with VP, being reasonable to schedule the delivery close to 37 weeks by elective cesarean section.

3.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 28(5): 214-219, 2020 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31842063

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: It is undetermined whether patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) have increased prevalence of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) since many VCFs are asymptomatic and radiographs may overlook them. We compared the prevalence of VCFs in patients older than 60 years with and without IBDs. METHODS: We studied 55 patients with IBDs and 165 controls who underwent CT scans for nonspinal conditions. We evaluated the presence of VCFs, fracture severity using the Genant score, and we determined whether age, sex, diagnosis of IBD, treatment, and time since diagnosis were associated with VCFs. Using logistic regression analysis, we assessed the independent effect of each variable. RESULTS: Mean age was 72.7 years; 165 patients (75%) were women. Thirty-five patients (16%) had at least one VCF (16.4% IBD; 15.8% controls, P = 0.92); both groups exhibited similar fracture severity. Patients with VCFs were older than patients without VCFs (79.8 versus 70.2, P < 0.01 IBD; 76.4 versus 72.4, P = 0.02 controls). No other clinical variables were different in patients with and without VCFs in either cohort. Only age was independently associated with VCFs in both cohorts. DISCUSSION: VCFs were not more frequent or severe in patients older than 60 years with IBD presented than in age-matched controls.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Compressão/etiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA