RESUMO
Background: Fluids are often administered for various purposes, such as resuscitation, replacement, maintenance, nutrition, or drug infusion. However, its use is not without risks. Critically ill patients are highly susceptible to fluid accumulation (FA), which is associated with poor outcomes, including organ dysfunction, prolonged mechanical ventilation, extended hospital stays, and increased mortality. This study aimed to assess the association between FA and poor outcomes in critically ill children. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to May 2024. Relevant publications were searched using the following terms: child, children, infant, infants, pediatric, pediatrics, critically ill children, critical illness, critical care, intensive care, pediatric intensive care, pediatric intensive care unit, fluid balance, fluid overload, fluid accumulation, fluid therapy, edema, respiratory failure, respiratory insufficiency, pulmonary edema, mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic instability, shock, sepsis, acute renal failure, acute kidney failure, acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, dialysis, mortality. Paediatric studies were considered eligible if they assessed the effect of FA on the outcomes of interest. The main outcome was all-cause mortality. Pooled analyses were performed by using random-effects models. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023432879). Findings: A total of 120 studies (44,682 children) were included. Thirty-five FA definitions were identified. In general, FA was significantly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.53-5.38), acute kidney injury (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.60-2.44), prolonged mechanical ventilation (weighted mean difference [WMD] 38.1 h, 95% CI 19.35-56.84), and longer stay in the intensive care unit (WMD 2.29 days; 95% CI 1.19-3.38). The percentage of FA was lower in survivors when compared to non-survivors (WMD -4.95 [95% CI, -6.03 to -3.87]). When considering only studies that controlled for potential confounding variables, the pooled analysis revealed 6% increased odds of mortality associated with each 1% increase in the percentage of FA (adjusted OR = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.09). Interpretation: FA is significantly associated with poorer outcomes in critically ill children. Thus, clinicians should closely monitor fluid balance, especially when new-onset or worsening organ dysfunction occurs in oedematous patients, indicating potential FA syndrome. Future research should explore interventions like restrictive fluid therapy or de-resuscitation methods. Meanwhile, preventive measures should be prioritized to mitigate FA until further evidence is available. Funding: None.
RESUMO
Rare diseases are characterized by a wide diversity of signs and symptoms and vary not only from disease to disease but also from person to person, and living with a disease leads patients to peculiar experiences, without limits of time and space, as they extend to various environments and relationships of their lives. Therefore, the objective of this study is the theoretical interaction between value co-creation (VC) and the stakeholder theory (ST) with the shared decision-making (SDM) health care theory, to enable the analysis of the relationships between patients and their stakeholders in the co-creation of value for decision-making focused on the patient's quality of life. It is configured as a multi-paradigmatic proposal by enabling the analysis of multiple perspectives of different stakeholders in health care. Thus, co-created decision-making (CDM) emerges with emphasis on interactivity of the relationships. As previous studies have already highlighted the importance of holistic care, seeing the patient as a whole and not just the body, studies with CDM will be beneficial for analyses that go beyond the clinical office and doctor-patient relationships, extending to all environments and interactions that add value to the patient's treatment. It was concluded that the essence of this new theory proposed here is neither in patient-centered care nor in patient self-care, but in co-created relationships with and between stakeholders, including non-health care environments that are important to the patient, such as relationships with friends, family, other patients with the same disease, social media, public policies, and the practice of pleasurable activities.
RESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health emergency. The clinical course of COVID-19 in children is mild in most of the cases, but multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is recognized as a potential life-threatening complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Acute abdomen as a presentation of COVID-19 is rare, and its correlation to COVID-19 features and prognosis remains undetermined. Herein, we describe a case of appendicitis in a child with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 identification in appendix tissue.
Assuntos
Abdome Agudo , Apendicite , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica , Abdome Agudo/etiologia , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/diagnóstico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Criança , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES) data, a cohort study that analyzed the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill children with sepsis on admission at 21 pediatric intensive care units in five Latin American countries. RESULTS: Of the 464 sepsis patients, 369 (79.5%) were admitted to public hospitals and 95 (20.5%) to private hospitals. Compared to those admitted to private hospitals, sepsis patients admitted to public hospitals did not differ in age, sex, immunization status, hospital length of stay or type of admission but had higher rates of septic shock, higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores, and higher rates of underlying diseases and maternal illiteracy. The proportion of patients admitted from pediatric wards and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals. Multivariate analysis did not show any correlation between mortality and the type of hospital, but mortality was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission in patients from public hospitals. CONCLUSION: In this sample of critically ill children from five countries in Latin America, the prevalence of septic shock within the first 24 hours at admission and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals. Higher sepsis-related mortality in children admitted to public pediatric intensive care units was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission but not with the type of hospital. New studies will be necessary to elucidate the causes of the higher prevalence and mortality of pediatric sepsis in public hospitals.
OBJETIVO: Relatar a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina. MÉTODOS: Análise post-hoc dos dados do Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES), um estudo de coorte que avaliou a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em 21 unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas de cinco países latino-americanos. RESULTADOS: Dentre os 464 pacientes com sepse, 369 (79,5%) foram admitidos em hospitais públicos e 95 (20,5%) em privados. Em comparação com os admitidos em hospitais privados, os pacientes com sepse admitidos em hospitais públicos não diferiram em termos de idade, sexo, condição de imunização, tempo de permanência no hospital ou tipo de admissão, porém tiveram incidência mais alta de choque séptico, escores Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) e Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) mais altos e taxas mais elevadas de doenças de base e analfabetismo materno. A proporção entre pacientes admitidos a partir de enfermarias pediátricas e mortalidade relacionada à sepse foi mais alta nos hospitais públicos. A análise multivariada não mostrou qualquer correlação entre mortalidade e tipo de hospital, porém, nos hospitais públicos, a mortalidade se associou com níveis mais altos de gravidade no momento da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva. CONCLUSÃO: Nesta amostra de crianças admitidas em condições críticas em cinco países latino-americanos, a prevalência de choque séptico nas primeiras 24 horas da admissão e a mortalidade relacionada à sepse foram mais elevadas em hospitais públicos do que nos privados. A mortalidade relacionada à sepse mais elevada em crianças admitidas em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica de hospitais públicos se associou com maior gravidade por ocasião da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva, porém não com o tipo de hospital. São necessários novos estudos para elucidar as causas da maior prevalência e mortalidade de sepse pediátrica em hospitais públicos.
Assuntos
Sepse , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais Privados , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , América Latina/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Sepse/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 in children is usually mild or asymptomatic, but severe and fatal paediatric cases have been described. The pathology of COVID-19 in children is not known; the proposed pathogenesis for severe cases includes immune-mediated mechanisms or the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues. We describe the autopsy findings in five cases of paediatric COVID-19 and provide mechanistic insight into the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. METHODS: Children and adolescents who died with COVID-19 between March 18 and August 15, 2020 were autopsied with a minimally invasive method. Tissue samples from all vital organs were analysed by histology, electron microscopy (EM), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). FINDINGS: Five patients were included, one male and four female, aged 7 months to 15 years. Two patients had severe diseases before SARS-CoV-2 infection: adrenal carcinoma and Edwards syndrome. Three patients were previously healthy and had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with distinct clinical presentations: myocarditis, colitis, and acute encephalopathy with status epilepticus. Autopsy findings varied amongst patients and included mild to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, pulmonary microthrombosis, cerebral oedema with reactive gliosis, myocarditis, intestinal inflammation, and haemophagocytosis. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in all patients in lungs, heart and kidneys by at least one method (RT-PCR, IHC or EM), and in endothelial cells from heart and brain in two patients with MIS-C (IHC). In addition, we show for the first time the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the brain tissue of a child with MIS-C with acute encephalopathy, and in the intestinal tissue of a child with acute colitis. Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 can infect several cell and tissue types in paediatric patients, and the target organ for the clinical manifestation varies amongst individuals. Two major patterns of severe COVID-19 were observed: a primarily pulmonary disease, with severe acute respiratory disease and diffuse alveolar damage, or a multisystem inflammatory syndrome with the involvement of several organs. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in several organs, associated with cellular ultrastructural changes, reinforces the hypothesis that a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues is involved in the pathogenesis of MIS-C. FUNDING: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
RESUMO
RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em hospitais públicos e privados na América Latina. Métodos: Análise post-hoc dos dados do Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES), um estudo de coorte que avaliou a prevalência e os desfechos da sepse em crianças admitidas em 21 unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas de cinco países latino-americanos. Resultados: Dentre os 464 pacientes com sepse, 369 (79,5%) foram admitidos em hospitais públicos e 95 (20,5%) em privados. Em comparação com os admitidos em hospitais privados, os pacientes com sepse admitidos em hospitais públicos não diferiram em termos de idade, sexo, condição de imunização, tempo de permanência no hospital ou tipo de admissão, porém tiveram incidência mais alta de choque séptico, escores Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2) e Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) mais altos e taxas mais elevadas de doenças de base e analfabetismo materno. A proporção entre pacientes admitidos a partir de enfermarias pediátricas e mortalidade relacionada à sepse foi mais alta nos hospitais públicos. A análise multivariada não mostrou qualquer correlação entre mortalidade e tipo de hospital, porém, nos hospitais públicos, a mortalidade se associou com níveis mais altos de gravidade no momento da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão: Nesta amostra de crianças admitidas em condições críticas em cinco países latino-americanos, a prevalência de choque séptico nas primeiras 24 horas da admissão e a mortalidade relacionada à sepse foram mais elevadas em hospitais públicos do que nos privados. A mortalidade relacionada à sepse mais elevada em crianças admitidas em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica de hospitais públicos se associou com maior gravidade por ocasião da admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva, porém não com o tipo de hospital. São necessários novos estudos para elucidar as causas da maior prevalência e mortalidade de sepse pediátrica em hospitais públicos.
ABSTRACT Objective: To report the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Latin American Pediatric Sepsis Study (LAPSES) data, a cohort study that analyzed the prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in critically ill children with sepsis on admission at 21 pediatric intensive care units in five Latin American countries. Results: Of the 464 sepsis patients, 369 (79.5%) were admitted to public hospitals and 95 (20.5%) to private hospitals. Compared to those admitted to private hospitals, sepsis patients admitted to public hospitals did not differ in age, sex, immunization status, hospital length of stay or type of admission but had higher rates of septic shock, higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM 2), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) scores, and higher rates of underlying diseases and maternal illiteracy. The proportion of patients admitted from pediatric wards and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals. Multivariate analysis did not show any correlation between mortality and the type of hospital, but mortality was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission in patients from public hospitals. Conclusion: In this sample of critically ill children from five countries in Latin America, the prevalence of septic shock within the first 24 hours at admission and sepsis-related mortality were higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals. Higher sepsis-related mortality in children admitted to public pediatric intensive care units was associated with greater severity on pediatric intensive care unit admission but not with the type of hospital. New studies will be necessary to elucidate the causes of the higher prevalence and mortality of pediatric sepsis in public hospitals.
Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Sepse/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Prevalência , Estudos de Coortes , Hospitais Privados , Mortalidade Hospitalar , América Latina/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: COVID-19 in children is usually mild or asymptomatic, but severe and fatal paediatric cases have been described. The pathology of COVID-19 in children is not known; the proposed pathogenesis for severe cases includes immune-mediated mechanisms or the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 on tissues. We describe the autopsy findings in five cases of paediatric COVID-19 and provide mechanistic insight into the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Methods: Children and adolescents who died with COVID-19 between March 18 and August 15, 2020 were autopsied with a minimally invasive method. Tissue samples from all vital organs were analysed by histology, electron microscopy (EM), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Findings: Five patients were included, one male and four female, aged 7 months to 15 years. Two patients had severe diseases before SARS-CoV-2 infection: adrenal carcinoma and Edwards syndrome. Three patients were previously healthy and had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with distinct clinical presentations: myocarditis, colitis, and acute encephalopathy with status epilepticus. Autopsy findings varied amongst patients and included mild to severe COVID-19 pneumonia, pulmonary microthrombosis, cerebral oedema with reactive gliosis, myocarditis, intestinal inflammation, and haemophagocytosis. SARSCoV- 2 was detected in all patients in lungs, heart and kidneys by at least one method (RT-PCR, IHC or EM), and in endothelial cells from heart and brain in two patients with MIS-C (IHC). In addition, we show for the first time the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the brain tissue of a child with MIS-C with acute encephalopathy, and in the intestinal tissue of a child with acute colitis. Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 can infect several cell and tissue types in paediatric patients, and the target organ for the...(AU)
Assuntos
Fenótipo , AutopsiaAssuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Criança , Hidratação , Humanos , Insuficiência de Múltiplos ÓrgãosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To report the prevalence of sepsis within the first 24 hours at admission and the PICU sepsis-related mortality among critically ill children admitted to PICU in South America. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-one PICU, located in five South America countries. PATIENTS: All children from 29 days to 17 years old admitted to the participating PICU between June 2011 and September 2011. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory data were registered within the first 24 hours at admission. Outcomes were registered upon PICU discharge or death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1,090 patients included in this study, 464 had sepsis. The prevalence of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock were 42.6%, 25.9%, and 19.8%, respectively. The median age of sepsis patients was 11.6 months (interquartile range, 3.2-48.7) and 43% had one or more prior chronic condition. The prevalence of sepsis was higher in infants (50.4%) and lower in adolescents (1.9%). Sepsis-related mortality was 14.2% and was consistently higher with increased disease severity: 4.4% for sepsis, 12.3% for severe sepsis, and 23.1% for septic shock. Twenty-five percent of deaths occurred within the first 24 hours at PICU admission. Multivariate analysis showed that higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores, the presence of two or more chronic conditions, and admission from pediatric wards were independently associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: We observed high prevalence of sepsis and sepsis-related mortality among this sample of children admitted to PICU in South America. Mortality was associated with greater severity of illness at admission and potentially associated with late PICU referral.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Sepse/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , América do Sul/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to compare the effects of dopamine or epinephrine in severe sepsis on 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were the rate of healthcare-associated infection, the need for other vasoactive drugs, and the multiple organ dysfunction score. DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial from February 1, 2009, to July 31, 2013. SETTING: PICU, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. PATIENTS: Consecutive children who are 1 month to 15 years old and met the clinical criteria for fluid-refractory septic shock. Exclusions were receiving vasoactive drug(s) prior to hospital admission, having known cardiac disease, having already participated in the trial during the same hospital stay, refusing to participate, or having do-not-resuscitate orders. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either dopamine (5-10 µg/kg/min) or epinephrine (0.1-0.3 µg/kg/min) through a peripheral or intraosseous line. Patients not reaching predefined stabilization criteria after the maximum dose were classified as treatment failure, at which point the attending physician gradually stopped the study drug and started another catecholamine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic and laboratory data were recorded. Baseline characteristics were described as proportions and mean (± SD) and compared using appropriate statistical tests. Multiple regression analysis was performed, and statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05. Baseline characteristics and therapeutic interventions for the 120 children enrolled (63, dopamine; 57, epinephrine) were similar. There were 17 deaths (14.2%): 13 (20.6%) in the dopamine group and four (7%) in the epinephrine group (p=0.033). Dopamine was associated with death (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.1-37.8; p=0.037) and healthcare-associated infection (odds ratio, 67.7; 95% CI, 5.0-910.8; p=0.001). The use of epinephrine was associated with a survival odds ratio of 6.49. CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine was associated with an increased risk of death and healthcare-associated infection. Early administration of peripheral or intraosseous epinephrine was associated with increased survival in this population. Limitations should be observed while interpreting these results.
Assuntos
Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Brasil , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estado Terminal/terapia , Dopamina/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Epinefrina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Nutrition therapy protocols seek to correlate current scientific knowledge with clinical practice by converting evidence-based efficacy data into clinical effectiveness. Implementing nutrition therapy protocols should be justified by their impact on clinical outcomes. Thus, our objective was to analyze studies that verified the effect of implementing protocols for enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients who are mechanically ventilated. We investigated initiation of nutrition therapy, time until nutrition requirements are met, optimization of protein and energy intake, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, mortality, and adherence to protocols. METHODS: We reviewed studies of human adults published over a 14-year period in English, Portuguese, French, or Spanish and available in MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Reference lists of the most relevant articles were also searched. The Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms searched were (enteral nutrition) subheading (therapy) AND (critical care) OR (critical illness) OR (intensive care). Terms were searched for in both the title and abstract. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included. Nutrition therapy was optimized after the implementation of nutrition protocols in all studies. However, the impact on clinical outcomes was modest. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of previously published studies indicates that implementing a nutrition therapy protocol can lead to optimization of various aspects of nutrition practice. Further studies that take into consideration local facilitating (as well as hindering) factors may reveal the impact of strategic EN protocols on clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Ingestão de Energia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Necessidades Nutricionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Respiração ArtificialRESUMO
Objetivo: Estudo realizado a partir da revisão deprontuários de pacientes internados na Unidade deTerapia Intensiva Pediátrica do Hospital Universitárioda Universidade de São Paulo, no período dedezembro de 2001 a dezembro de 2004, descreveoito casos de choque séptico refratário a catecolaminas.Método: Observou-se que predominou perfilhemodinâmico, baseado em informações obtidasdo cateter de artéria pulmonar (CAP). Resultados:Houve elevado índice cardíaco e baixa resistênciavascular sistêmica. Conclusão: Os achados desseestudo diferem da descrição de Ceneviva et al.Novos estudos necessitam ser realizados visandoesclarecer o perfil hemodinâmico de crianças comchoque séptico refratário a volume e catecolaminase definir o papel da monitorização com CAP nesses casos.
Objectives: Study done from the revision of charts ofhospitalized patients from the Pediatric Intensive CareUnit of Hospital of the University of São Paulo, in periodof December 2001 to December 2004, describes 8 casesof catecholamine-resistant septic shock. Methods: It wasobserved that the predominant hemodynamic profile, basedon information obtained from pulmonary artery catheter(PAC). Results: There was high cardiac index and lowsystemic vascular resistance. Conclusion: It was differentfrom description of Ceneviva et al. New studies must beundertaken to clarify the hemodynamic profile of childrenwith volume and catecholamine-resistant septic shock andto define the role of PAC monitoring in these cases.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Artéria Pulmonar/cirurgia , Catecolaminas , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Choque Séptico , HemodinâmicaRESUMO
O propósito deste artigo é lançar luz sobre a dinâmica das redes de conhecimento, nos países em desenvolvimento, por meio da análise da produção científica da maior universidade do Nordeste do Brasil (UFBA) e sua influência sobre algumas instituições regionais de pesquisa no estado da Bahia. Através de um teste de metodologia, as produções científicas, especificamente no campo da química, da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), da Universidade do Estado da Bahia (Uneb) e da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc) foram minuciosamente analisadas e cruzadas. Por meio da análise de redes sociais investigou-se a existência de pequenos fenômenos do mundo e a importância destes fenômenos na realização da pesquisa nas três universidades. Os resultados obtidos com a pesquisa elucidaram dados de grande interesse sobre a produção científica nessas universidades e comprovaram a importante participação da rede UFBA e das outras duas instituições públicas de pesquisa, bem como a importância dos pesquisadores na consolidação de redes. Este artigo também sugere que a metodologia pode ser adequada à medida que a produção científica seja utilizada como um substituto para o conhecimento científico.
Assuntos
Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/tendências , Serviços de Informação , Sistemas de Informação , Conhecimento , Publicações , PesquisadoresRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The ACCM/PALS guidelines address early correction of paediatric septic shock using conventional measures. In the evolution of these recommendations, indirect measures of the balance between systemic oxygen delivery and demands using central venous or superior vena cava oxygen saturation (ScvO(2) > or = 70%) in a goal-directed approach have been added. However, while these additional goal-directed endpoints are based on evidence-based adult studies, the extrapolation to the paediatric patient remains unvalidated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare treatment according to ACCM/PALS guidelines, performed with and without ScvO(2) goal-directed therapy, on the morbidity and mortality rate of children with severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Children and adolescents with severe sepsis or fluid-refractory septic shock were randomly assigned to ACCM/PALS with or without ScvO(2) goal-directed resuscitation. MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-eight-day mortality was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 102 enrolled patients, 51 received ACCM/PALS with ScvO(2) goal-directed therapy and 51 received ACCM/PALS without ScvO(2) goal-directed therapy. ScvO(2) goal-directed therapy resulted in less mortality (28-day mortality 11.8% vs. 39.2%, p=0.002), and fewer new organ dysfunctions (p=0.03). ScvO(2) goal-directed therapy resulted in more crystalloid (28 (20-40) vs. 5 (0-20 ml/kg, p<0.0001), blood transfusion (45.1% vs. 15.7%, p=0.002) and inotropic (29.4% vs. 7.8%, p=0.01) support in the first 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the current ACCM/PALS guidelines. Goal-directed therapy using the endpoint of a ScvO(2)> or =70% has a significant and additive impact on the outcome of children and adolescents with septic shock.