RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To improve the technique for hepatic blood flow examination, with the objective of investigating the role for Doppler flowmetry of the liver in monitoring pregnant females with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Two physicians independently examined a group of 50 healthy pregnant females. The main difference in the proposed technique is the measurement of the vessel cross-sectional area and the adjustment of the Doppler samples according to the diameter of each vessel. The portal vein was studied by using two approaches: in the epigastrium, to measure the diameter, and in the intercostal, for Doppler sample collection. The common hepatic artery was studied by using the epigastric approach. The average of three measurements of each vessel, in each subject, with intrarater and interrater agreements, was compared. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the intrarater flow measurements of the hepatic artery and portal vein ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 (p < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the interrater flow measurements was 0.93 for the flow of the portal vein (p < 0.0001), 0.94 for the flow of the hepatic artery (p < 0.0001) and 0.96 for the measurement of the portal vein diameter (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new technique for evaluation of blood flow to the liver displayed excellent reproducibility, possibly because of the adjustment of the Doppler samples according to the diameter of each vessel. Advances in knowledge: This approach will add reliability to the method. It opens a vast field of investigation given the importance of liver vascular lesions in pre-eclampsia.
Assuntos
Fígado/irrigação sanguínea , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo/fisiologia , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Peptides involved in the regulation of body composition are of interest in hemodialysis (HD) patients because protein wasting associated with high fat mass (FM) is present in these patients. Zinc-α2-glycoprotein (ZAG), a new adipokine, is involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism, adiposity, and energy balance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ZAG levels and its relationship with body composition and dietary intake in HD patients. Forty-nine HD patients (28 men, 53.1 ± 12.5 years, and BMI 24.0 ± 4.3 kg/m2) were studied and compared with 20 healthy subjects (9 men, 49.5 ± 15.2 years, and BMI 25.6 ± 4.1 kg/m(2)). Plasma ZAG levels were measured using the ELISA methods and body composition was evaluated through anthropometric data. Dietary intake was assessed 3 days by 24-hour food recall. Although most of the HD patients (59.2%) were eutrophic according to BMI, 92.3% presented high percentage of body fat (BF), and 43.5%, reduced fat-free mass according to midarm muscle circumference values. ZAG levels were â¼2.5-fold higher in HD patients (135.9 ± 40.9 mg/L) compared with healthy individuals (54.6 ± 23.0 mg/L) (p < 0.0001). Circulating ZAG was not associated with dietary intake; however, this peptide was negatively correlated with %BF and, for each 1% reduction in BF, ZAG levels increased by 2.4 mg/L (p = 0.02). In summary, circulating ZAG is increased and inversely correlated with adiposity in HD patients; however, in spite of its higher plasma levels, the majority of HD patients did not show low BF.
Assuntos
Adiposidade/fisiologia , Metabolismo Energético , Obesidade/sangue , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Proteínas de Plasma Seminal/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Composição Corporal , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Adulto Jovem , Glicoproteína Zn-alfa-2RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), spherical equivalent (SE), average central keratometry (K-Avg), corneal astigmatism (CA), corneal volume (CV), anterior chamber (AC) depth, and central corneal thickness (CCT) between patients with mild keratoconus and healthy controls and to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of CH and CRF in discriminating mild keratoconus from healthy corneas. DESIGN: Comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three eyes (40 patients) with mild keratoconus (group 1) and 80 eyes from 40 gender- and age-matched controls (group 2). METHODS: Patients underwent a complete clinical eye examination, corneal topography (Humphrey ATLAS; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), tomography (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and biomechanical evaluations (ocular response analyzer; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify cutoff points that maximized sensitivity and specificity in discriminating mild keratoconus from normal corneas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal hysteresis, CRF, SE, K-Avg, CA, CV, AC depth, and CCT. The diagnostic performance of CH and CRF for detecting mild keratoconus was assessed using the ROC curve. RESULTS: In group 1 versus group 2, the SE values (mean+/-standard deviation) were -3.55+/-2.87 diopters (D) versus -1.46+/-3.09 D (P = 0); K-Avg, 45.09+/-2.24 versus 43.24+/-1.54 D (P = 0); CA, 3.15+/-1.87 versus 1.07+/-0.83 D (P = 0); CV, 57.3+/-2.12 versus 60.86+/-3.39 mm3 (P = 0); AC depth, 3.19+/-0.35 versus 3.05+/-0.43 mm (P = 0.0416); CCT, 503+/-34.15 versus 544.71+/-35.89 microm (P = 0); CH, 8.50+/-1.36 versus 10.17+/-1.79 mmHg (P = 0); CRF, 7.85+/-1.49 versus 10.13+/-2.0 mmHg (P = 0). The ROC curve analyses showed a poor overall predictive accuracy of CH (cutoff, 9.64 mmHg; sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 65%; test accuracy, 74.83%) and CRF (cutoff, 9.60 mmHg; sensitivity, 90.5%; specificity, 66%; test accuracy, 76.97%) for detecting mild keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS: The values for CH, CRF, CV, and CCT were statistically lower and those for SE, K-Avg, CA, and AC depth were statistically higher in patients with mild keratoconus compared with controls. Corneal hysteresis and CRF were poor parameters for discriminating between mild keratoconus and normal corneas. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Assuntos
Segmento Anterior do Olho/patologia , Córnea/fisiologia , Tecido Elástico/fisiologia , Elasticidade/fisiologia , Ceratocone/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Astigmatismo/diagnóstico , Astigmatismo/fisiopatologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Topografia da Córnea , Feminino , Humanos , Ceratocone/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare tomographic, clinical, and biomechanical data of patients with unilateral keratoconus and healthy controls. METHODS: Observational, case-control study. Complete clinical eye examination was followed by topographic (ATLAS), tomographic (Pentacam), and biomechanical (Ocular Response Analyzer) evaluation. Cases were sex- and age-matched with healthy individuals for controls. RESULTS: Four patients had unilateral keratoconus, and eight healthy patients served as controls. Central corneal thickness was 508±16 µm in the keratoconus group, 531±12.7 µm in the fellow eye group, and 528.6±40.7 µm in the control group (P>.125, all comparisons). Central keratometry was 43.70±2.70 diopters (D) in the keratoconus group, 42.84±1.43 D in the fellow eye group, and 43.81±1.94 D in the control group (P>.45, all comparisons). Corneal astigmatism was 3.30±2.24 D in the keratoconus group, 1.38±1.49 D in the fellow eye group, and 1.34±1.13 D in the control group (P=.037 between the keratoconus and control groups; P=.25 between the keratoconus and fellow eye groups). Corneal hysteresis was 8.13±2 mmHg in the keratoconus group, 8.96±0.86 mmHg in the fellow eye group, and 9.89±1.33 mmHg in the control group (P>.064, all comparisons). Corneal resistance factor was 7.96±2.43 mmHg in the keratoconus group, 8.92±1.39 mmHg in the fellow eye group, and 9.90±2.24 mmHg in the control group (P>.33, all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor values were not statistically different among the groups; however, a trend for lower values was found for keratoconus and fellow eyes compared to controls. Data should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample.
Assuntos
Fenômenos Biomecânicos/fisiologia , Córnea/fisiopatologia , Ceratocone/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Topografia da Córnea , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fotografação , Tomografia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical metrics with tomographic parameters (given by the Oculus Pentacam) and refractive data in a population of healthy Brazilian patients. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study of 150 consecutive patients (53 men and 97 women; 260 eyes). Age, gender, central keratometric readings (central K), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), spherical equivalent refraction, corneal hysteresis, and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 46.5+/-21.04 years, average central K was 43.59+/-1.54 diopters (D), CCT was 545.05+/-35.41 microm, ACD was 2.96+/-0.52 mm, spherical equivalent refraction was -1.16+/-3.48 D, corneal hysteresis was 10.17+/-1.82, and CRF was 10.14+/-1.8 (range: 5.45 to 15.1). Mean CRF and corneal hysteresis were distinct among gender: CRF 10.326 in women and 9.810 in men (P=.0266); corneal hysteresis 10.421 in women and 9.727 in men (P=.0031). A negative correlation was found between both CRF and corneal hysteresis with age (r=-0.1255, P=.0434; and r=-0.2445, P=.0001, respectively). No association was found between CRF and average central K (r=0.0633, P=.3086), ACD (r=-0.0474, P=.4498), or spherical equivalent refraction (r=0.1028, P=.1061). Corneal hysteresis was not associated with age and average central K (r=0.0572, P=.3573), ACD (r=0.0060, P=.9236), or spherical equivalent refraction (r=0.0975, P=.1253). Corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis were positively associated with CCT (r=0.5760, P=0; and r=0.4655, P=0, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Brazilian patients were associated with CCT, gender, and age. Corneal steepness, ACD, and spherical equivalent refraction did not affect comeal hysteresis and CRF values in the studied population.