RESUMO
Breast cancer (BC) is a highly prevalent malignancy in Latin American women, most cases being diagnosed at locally advanced or metastatic stages when options for cancer care are limited. Despite its label as a public health problem in the region, Latin American BC patients face several barriers in accessing standard of care treatment when compared with patients from developed countries. In this review, we analyse the landscape of the four main identified barriers in the region: i) high burden of locally advanced/advanced BC; ii) inadequate access to medical resources; iii) deficient access to specialised cancer care and iv) insufficient BC research in Latin America. Unfortunately, these barriers represent the main factors associated with the BC poor outcomes seen in the region. Targeted actions should be conducted independently by each country and as a region to overcome these limitations and create an enhanced model of BC care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are well-known differences in gender outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other cancers. In this work, we evaluated several randomised clinical trials to explore the gender influence in the outcome of patients with NSCLC treated with targeted therapy and immunotherapy. METHODS: We performed a series of meta-analysis to compare the gender outcome in the routine setting for overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) in phase III randomised clinical trials comparing EGFR inhibitors versus chemotherapy (OPTIMAL, LUX-lung 3, LUX-lung 6, EURTAC, ENSURE and WTJOG); ALK inhibitors versus chemotherapy (ASCEND 4, ASCEND 5, PROFILE 1014 and NCT009323893) and anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy (CheckMate 017, CheckMate 026, CheckMate 057, KEYNOTE 010 and KEYNOTE 024). RESULTS: Female patients with NSCLC have a reduced risk of death compared with men (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79; p<0.00001). Women had a better benefit from EGFR inhibitors than men (HR=0.34; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.40; p<0.00001 vs HR=0.44; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.56; p<0.00001, respectively). The benefit from ALK inhibitors was similar for both genders (HR=0.51; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.61; p<0.00001 vs HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.59; p<0.00001, for women and men, respectively). Anti-PD1 inhibitors significantly improved the PFS in male patients when compared with chemotherapy (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; p<0.00001); in contrast, women showed no benefit in 5/5 randomised trials (HR=1.03; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.20; p=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, some targeted treatments were influenced by gender. Despite differences in outcomes that could be attributed to different histology, EGFR and smoking status, gender should be evaluated more deeply as prognostic variable in patients with NSCLC.
RESUMO
There are different biological and clinical patterns of lung cancer between genders indicating intrinsic differences leading to increased sensitivity to cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage, mutational patterns of KRAS and better clinical outcomes in women while differences between genders at gene-expression levels was not previously reported. Here we show an enrichment of immune genes in NSCLC in women compared to men. We found in a GSEA analysis (by biological processes annotated from Gene Ontology) of six public datasets a repeated observation of immune gene sets enrichment in women. "Immune system process", "immune response", "defense response", "cellular defense response" and "regulation of immune system process" were the gene sets most over-represented while APOBEC3G, APOBEC3F, LAT, CD1D and CCL5 represented the top-five core genes. Characterization of immune cell composition with the platform CIBERSORT showed no differences between genders; however, there were differences when tumor tissues were compared to normal tissues. Our results suggest different immune responses in NSCLC between genders that could be related with the different clinical outcome.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/imunologia , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Topoisomerase II-α is a molecular target of anthracyclines; several studies have suggested that topoisomerase II-α expression is related to response to anthracycline treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate if topoisomerase II-α overexpression predicts response to anthracycline treatment in locally advanced breast cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Topoisomerase II-α, HER2, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors from 111 patients presenting with locally advanced breast cancer between 1995 and 2002. The prognostic value of these markers was analyzed using a multivariate proportional hazards regression model and an interaction analysis between topoisomerase II-α status and dose intensity. RESULTS: Tumors from 40 patients (36%) showed topoisomerase II-α overexpression, 62 patients (56%) for ER, 39 (35%) for PR and 26 (23%) for HER2. There were no significant correlations between topoisomerase II-α expression and response to therapy, progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Anthracycline dose intensity had a significant impact on PFS and OS in patients overexpressing topoisomerase II-α (P=0.010 and 0.027, respectively). Negative PR (P=0.041), positive HER2 (P=0.013) were identified as risk factors in the multivariate model. The multivariate analysis in patients topoisomerase II-α negative shown no significance (HR=0.92, IC 95% 0.39-2.15, P=0.839) while the multivariate analysis in topoisomerase II-α positive, dose intensity shown to be statistically significant (HR=2.725, IC 95% 1.07-6.95, P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support a correlation between topoisomerase II-α expression in breast cancer patients and improved clinical benefit with anthracycline therapy. However, they do suggest that tumors overexpressing topoisomerase II-α may experience better clinical benefit with higher anthracycline dose intensity.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Neoplasias/análise , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , DNA Topoisomerases Tipo II/análise , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/análise , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Receptores de Estrogênio/análise , Receptores de Progesterona/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the prognostic effect hormone receptor (HR) status in early HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients, since it has not yet been established whether HR status can be used in the prognosis of patients with (HER2+) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We obtained data from 299 patients with early HER2+ breast cancer who underwent surgery and received standard adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and/or radiation between 2000 and 2002 at the Instituto Nacional De Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Perú. Clinical and pathological features were compared. Endpoints analyzed were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 155 patients were HR-positive (HR+) and 144 were negative (HR-). The two groups had similar characteristics except for histologic grade and extracapsular extension. With a median follow-up of 93 months, 5-year DFS was statistically different between the two groups: 65.0% for (HER2+/ HR-) and 74.6% for the (HER2+/ HR+) patients (p=.045). OS at 5 years was not statistically different between the two groups with 75.5% for (HER2+/ HR-) patients and 82.4% for the (HER2+/ HR+)(p=.140). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with (HER2+/ HR-) breast cancers treated with surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a statistically worse DFS compared to those with (HER2+/ HR+) tumors. However, OS was similar in both groups.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Molecular classification is an excellent prognostic and predictive method in breast cancer (BC). In this study. we evaluated differences in clinicopathologic features and overall survival (OS) in four BC molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, basal cell-like, and HER2/neu. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and HER2 was performed using a Peruvian hospital database of 1198 BC patients who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2002. Overall survival was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 1198 patients with invasive BC, 49.3% were luminal A; 13.2%, luminal B; 21.3%, basal-like; and 16.2%, HER2. The mean of age at diagnosis was 51.5 years for luminal A; 49.6 for luminal B; 49.5 for basal-like; and 49.4 for HER2. The HER2 subtype showed 63.7% positive lymph nodes, 42.3% stage III and 9.7% stage IV cases. Basal subtypes showed the highest prevalence of a poorly differentiated phenotype (70.3%). Average follow-up was 60 months. Five-year OS was significantly different between all 4 groups (P < .0001); luminal A had the highest OS, followed by luminal B, basal-like; and HER2. Results are compared with other population studies. CONCLUSION: This study shows significant differences between the distribution of molecular subtypes and clinicopathologic features. Immunohistochemistry is useful in the clinical management of BC patients.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/classificação , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Peru , Receptor ErbB-2/biossíntese , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Receptores de Estrogênio/biossíntese , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Receptores de Progesterona/biossíntese , Receptores de Progesterona/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This phase II trial of pemetrexed explored potential correlations between treatment outcome (antitumor activity) and molecular target expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chemonaïve patients with advanced breast cancer received up to three cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-minute i.v. infusion) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Tumors were surgically removed after the last cycle of pemetrexed as clinically indicated. Biopsies were taken at baseline, 24 hours after infusion in cycle 1, and after cycle 3. RESULTS: Sixty-one women (median age, 46 years; range, 32-72 years) were treated and were evaluable for response. Objective response rate was 31%. Simple logistic regression suggested a potential relationship between mRNA expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and pemetrexed response (P = 0.103). Based on threshold analysis, patients with "low" baseline TS (< or = 71) were more likely to respond to pemetrexed than patients with "high" baseline TS (>71). Expression of baseline dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase tended to be higher in responders but this association was not significant (P > 0.311). TS expression increased significantly between baseline and biopsy 2 (P = 0.004) and dropped to near baseline levels at biopsy 3. Conversely, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase decreased after pemetrexed chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a potential association between "low" pretreatment TS expression levels and response to pemetrexed chemotherapy. Future trials examining expression levels of other genes important to the folate pathway and/or breast cancer may identify a more robust multigene profile that can better predict response to this novel antifolate.