RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Thoracic central vein (TCV) obstruction (TCVO) in the presence of upper extremity (UE) hemodialysis access can present as superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) and cause vascular access dysfunction and failure. We report the techniques and results of endorevascularization of TCVO in hemodialysis patients, which allowed for long-term functioning vascular access in the UE. METHODS: From June 2009 to February 2020, 45 hemodialysis patients underwent TCV endorevascularization. The indications for surgery were TCVO or SVCS that threatened the function of a preexisting upper arm access or contraindicated placement of a new upper arm access. Conventional endovascular techniques were used when feasible. Patients with unfavorable anatomy were treated using a transseptal needle to cross difficult intrathoracic stenosis and occlusions or to facilitate an inside-out central venous access technique. The reestablishment of venous outflow was accomplished with angioplasty, stenting, and/or placement of HeRO conduits. Successful revascularization was followed by hemodialysis access revision or a new UE access placement. We recorded the risk factors and procedural outcomes, patency rates, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 53 ± 16.3 years, and 51% were women. The most common risk factors were diabetes mellitus (64.2%) and hypertension (56%). Twenty-five patients (55.5%) had symptoms of SVCS. These symptoms resolved after the TCV procedure in all cases. Crossing of the TCV lesion was successful using a conventional catheter and wire in 26 cases (57.8%) and transseptal needle in 17 cases (37.8%), including 12 using an inside-out central venous access technique. Treatment of the TCV lesion included a HeRO conduit in 20 cases (44.4%), stenting in 17 (37.7%), and transluminal balloon angioplasty alone in 7 (15.5%). Other veins were treated in 33 cases (73.3%). The overall technical success rate was 95.5%. Two intraoperative complications occurred, including one case of severe hypotension and one of fatal cardiac tamponade. Of the 16 patients with preexisting UE access, its function was preserved in all 16 (100%). In 24 of 27 patients (85.7%), new arm access was successfully created after the TCV procedure. The overall clinical success rate was 88.9%. The average follow-up was 663.4 days (median, 507 days; range, 0-2679 days). During follow-up, 26 patients had undergone 90 procedures to maintain access function, 21 had undergone repeat endovascular interventions, and 17 had undergone open procedures. Eight patients (17.8%) had developed infection, five involving HeRO conduits that required excision with loss of access. During the follow-up period, 14 patients (31%) had died of unrelated causes, and 34 patients (75.5%) maintained functional access. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have shown that endorevascularization of TCVO reconstruction is effective in maintaining function or allowing the creation of UE hemodialysis access, with acceptable complication rates.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Diálise Renal , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/terapia , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia com Balão/instrumentação , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peru , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/etiologia , Síndrome da Veia Cava Superior/fisiopatologia , Texas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study identifies often overlooked anatomical sites for nonthrombotic venous outflow obstruction (NTVO) in patients with unexplained lower extremity edema and pain. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 75 consecutive patients experiencing symptoms of unexplained lower extremity edema with pain that were unexplained by ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), who subsequently underwent venography in an outpatient medical office from 2010 to 2014. We categorized venograms based on the presence or absence of NTVO lesions and calculated prevalence of each at specific sites. The patients with NTVO lesions showing >50% stenosis on venography were then treated with angioplasty and/or stenting. After intervention, we documented subjective levels of pain and edema. RESULTS: Of the 75 venograms reviewed, physicians classified 52 as normal and 23 as showing evidence of compression, including 9 with May-Thurner syndrome and 14 with anatomical compressions at previously underreported sites. These 14 compression sites occurred at the following: iliofemoral vein at the inguinal ligament region (n = 7, 50%), external iliac vein at the iliac artery bifurcation (n = 1, 7.1%), both inguinal ligament region and iliac artery bifurcation (n = 4, 28.6%), and popliteal vein at the popliteal fossa (n = 2, 14.3%). Nine of the 14 patients (64.3%) reported total or near total resolution of lower extremity pain and edema at follow-up between 1 and 7 months (mean = 5.3 ± 2 months, median = 6 months) after balloon angioplasty and/or stent. Five with failed primary interventions underwent subsequent stenting and/or angioplasty and reported total or near total resolution of pain and clinical resolution of edema. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to broaden the disease profile of venous compression syndromes to other sites such as the hypogastric artery, inguinal ligament, and popliteal fossa. The results support previous research that suggests increased incidence of NTVO exists among patients with unexplained lower extremity edema and pain. In an effort to encourage further exploration, we developed a diagnostic algorithm to support a critical and systematic review of patients with lower extremity edema and pain that may go unexplained using traditional diagnostic measures, including ultrasound, CTA, and MRI alone.