RESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the efficacy and the toxicity of low dose weekly gemcitabine with radiation therapy in medically unfit muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were included into the retrospective analysis. Weekly gemcitabine was administered 75 mg/m(2) with a median dose of 63 Gy radiation therapy. Clinical target volume was defined as the urinary bladder only in conformal treatment planning. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 51 months (range 14-118 months). Complete response rate was 62.5 %. The 5-year local progression-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 40.6, 59.5 and 58.5 %, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was continued in 80.7 % of patients without any interruption. Gemcitabine was stopped due to grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1), cardiac angina (n = 1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (n = 1) or patients' reluctance (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Low dose weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy is a tolerable regimen and have comparable outcomes with platinum-based combined treatments in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Prospective randomized trials can help in understanding the safety and efficacy of this treatment specially in medically unfit patients.
Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , GencitabinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a high relapse rate despite being very chemosensitive. The efficacy of second-line treatment is dismal. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of second-line treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed data of 120 SCLC patients who failed first-line treatment and received second-line treatment at three medical oncology centers. RESULTS: Median age of group was 58. 82 % had an ECOG PS of 0-1 at the time of relapse. 39 % were at limited stage (LS) at the time of diagnosis. Patients who progressed more than 3 months after first-line therapy were categorized as having platinum-sensitive disease (PSD) (64 %). The number of patients who received platin-based combination treatment was 33 (27 %). The median OS time starting from the initiation of second-line treatment was 7 months. Multivariate analysis identified PS (p = 0.006), extent of disease at diagnosis (0.014) and PSD (0.001) as the independent prognostic factors for survival. Subgroup analyses of the patients with PSD indicated platin rechallenge yields higher progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate. CONCLUSION: Patients with good ECOG PS,who have PSD or initially presenting with LS, have a good prognosis and in patients with PSD, platinum-based therapy would be more appropriate.