Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr ; 105(4): 633-8, 1984 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6384453

RESUMO

We performed a randomized controlled trial of cefaclor administered twice daily compared with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) administered twice daily for the treatment of acute otitis media. Pathogens were eradicated from the middle ear exudate after 3 to 6 days of therapy in 35 of 37 (95%) patients given TMP-SMZ compared with 28 of 40 (70%) given cefaclor (P = 0.017). Haemophilus influenzae was eliminated in 13 of 14 (93%) patients given TMP-SMZ compared with 10 of 18 (56%) given cefaclor (P = 0.047). Clinical outcomes failed to distinguish between patients given TMP-SMZ or cefaclor. Symptoms improved despite persistent infection in 11 of 13 (85%) patients; middle-ear effusion persisted after therapy in 38 of 61 (62%) patients despite eradication of pathogens. We conclude that twice daily TMP-SMZ is more efficacious than twice daily cefaclor for the treatment of acute otitis media and that clinical outcomes may fail to detect differences between antibacterial agents in comparative drug trials in acute otitis media.


Assuntos
Cefaclor/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/análogos & derivados , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Trimetoprima/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Pré-Escolar , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Combinação de Medicamentos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA