RESUMO
A method for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of free sulfide and volatile alkythiols (methanethiol/ethanethiol) existing as contaminant in parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions was developed. The volatile sulfides (dihydrogensulfide and alkylthiols) formed in the formulations were distilled over 45 min at 47 degrees C in a purpose-made Conway cell. The analytes were quantified by differential pulse cathodic stripping voltametry (DPCSV) at the hanging mercury-drop electrode and determined, simultaneously as dihydrogensulfide and alkylthiols using a 60 s preconcentration time at -300 mV (versus Ag/AgCl, Cl(-) 3.0 mol l(-1)). The voltammetric signals were directly linear proportional to the sulfides concentrations in the PN solutions in the range 3-20 mumol l(-1) and detection limits of about 2 mumol l(-1) were calculated. Recoveries of sulfides from PN solutions in the range 90-110% were calculated using the method and nine commercial PN formulations were analyzed. Methanethiol and ethanethiol were quantified from their composite signals, and the mutual influence of the analytes on the DPCSV measurements is discussed.
RESUMO
A method for the automated polarographic determination of sulfide in a gas-diffusion flow system was developed. The volatile sulfide, existing as a contaminant in parenteral amino acid solutions, was measured after gas diffusion using 0.1 mol l-1 NaOH solution as acceptor. The linear range of calibration, for measurements at a dropping-mercury electrode (DME), was from 5 to 100 micrograms of sulfide with r = 0.999 and RSD = 7.5% (n = 5) for 10 micrograms of sulfide. For measurements at the hanging mercury-drop electrode (HMDE), with a preconcentration time of 30 s, the linear range of calibration was from 0.9 to 20 micrograms of sulfide with r = 0.998 and RSD = 5.8% (n = 5) for 2 micrograms of sulfide. Detection limits of 59 and 11 micrograms l-1 at the DME and HMDE, respectively, were calculated and the recoveries of sulfide from spiked samples were 91.5-104.5%. Parameters that affect the sulfide determination using this method, such as the organic content of the matrix, pH, flow rate and sample size, were investigated.