RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Physical boundaries to access skilled orthotist or hand therapy care may be hindered by multiple factors, such as geography, or availability. This study evaluated the accuracy of fitting a prefabricated wrist splint using an app on a smart device. We hypothesize that remote brace fitting by artificial intelligence (AI) can accurately determine the brace size the patient needs without in-person fitting. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were recruited to fit wrist braces. Using 2 standardized calibrated images captured by the smart device, each subject's image was loaded into the machine learning software (AI). Later, hand features were extracted, calibrated, and measured the application, calculated the correct splint size, and compared with the splint chosen by our subjects to improve its own accuracy. As a control (control 1), the subjects independently selected the best brace fit from an array of available splints. Subject selection was recorded and compared with the AI fit splint. As the second method of fitting (control 2), we compared the manufacturer recommended brace size (based on measured wrist circumference and provided sizing chart/insert brochure) with the AI fit splint. RESULTS: A total of 54 volunteers were included. Thirty-two splints predicted by the algorithm matched the exact size chosen by each subject yielding 70% accuracy with a standard deviation of 10% ( p < 0.001). The accuracy increased to 90% with 5% standard deviation if the splints were predicted within the next size category. Fit by manufacturer sizing chart was only 33% in agreement with participant selection. CONCLUSION: Remote brace fitting using AI prediction model may be an acceptable alternative to current standards because it can accurately predict wrist splint size. As more subjects were analyzed, the AI algorithm became more accurate predicting proper brace fit. In addition, AI fit braces are more than twice as accurate as relying on the manufacturer sizing chart.

Assuntos

RESUMO

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.02.009.].

RESUMO

Purpose: Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted. Results: A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%). Conclusions: This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

RESUMO

Acute and chronic pain management remains an ongoing challenge for hand surgeons. This has been compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis throughout the United States and other countries, previous societal stigmas about this substance keep evolving, and recognition of medical cannabis as an opioid-sparing pain management alternative is growing. A review of the current literature demonstrates a strong interest from patients regarding the use of medical cannabis for pain control. Current evidence demonstrates its efficacy and safety for chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. However, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of cannabis for pain control in hand and upper extremity conditions require continued investigation. The purpose of this article is to provide a general review of the mechanism of medical cannabis and a scoping review of the current evidence for its efficacy, safety, and potential applicability in hand and upper extremity conditions.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The United States spends more on health care than any other country in the world based on the percentage of gross domestic product. This fact is coupled with health care facilities contributing nearly one-tenth of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States, and with the health care industry's waste contributions to landfills being second only to those of the food industry. In some instances, operating rooms produce the majority of total landfill waste from hospitals; therefore, patients undergoing surgical procedures can have both financial and environmental impacts. Recently, the wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet technique in hand surgery has grown in popularity. This technique has reportedly allowed surgeons to decrease operating room costs, time, and waste, but without compromising patient safety or outcomes. This comprehensive literature review summarizes the current literature related to the economic and environmental impacts of the wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet technique in hand surgery.

RESUMO

Purpose: The wide-awake local anesthesia technique in hand surgery is widely used, but there are currently no guidelines or protocols for the number of operating room personnel required to optimize patient safety intraoperatively. This study aimed to evaluate perioperative complication rates of wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgeries performed at surgery centers that used different numbers of operating room nurses. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgery at 4 surgical centers over a 30-month consecutive period. Two surgical centers used 3 operating room nurses, and 2 centers used 2 operating room nurses. The complications reported included intraoperative case abortion because of critical change in patient vitals, intraoperative medication delivery, intraoperative intravenous placement for medication delivery, intraoperative conversion to sedation, intraoperative medical complications, and postoperative transfer to the emergency department or a hospital. Results: A total of 1,771 wide-awake local anesthesia surgical procedures were identified, with 925 performed at a facility that used 2 operating room nurses and 846 performed at a facility that used 3 operating room nurses. There were no perioperative complications in either group during the study period. Conclusions: There was no difference in perioperative complications between the surgery centers that used 3 versus 2 intraoperative nurses during wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgery. This study supports that limiting the nursing personnel for wide-awake local anesthesia hand surgeries could be an efficient way to cut procedural costs without compromising patient safety. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

RESUMO

Purpose: Thumb basal joint arthroplasty surgery is a common hand surgery after which patients often require opioids. To better understand safe opioid consumption patterns, this study sought to identify risk factors for filling a second prescription and/or prolonged opioid use (prescription over 6 months after the surgery). Preoperative opioid use was hypothesized to show an association with greater postoperative opioid use. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent primary thumb basal joint arthroplasty was conducted, yielding 110 patients for analysis. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Opioid prescription data were extracted from 6 months before the surgery to 9 months after the surgery using a state prescription drug monitoring program. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed for filling a second opioid prescription or filling an opioid prescription over 6 months after the surgery. Results: All the patients filled their initial postoperative prescription. Of the 110 patients, 26.4% filled an opioid prescription before the surgery, 42% filled a second postoperative prescription, and 14.5% were still consuming opioids over 6 months after the surgery. Patients using preoperative opioids had 7-fold higher odds of filling a second opioid prescription and 37-fold higher odds of prolonged use. No other demographic or clinical factors, including the type of procedure or number of initial opioids prescribed, were associated with increased use of postoperative opioids. Of all the opioid prescriptions filled after the initial postoperative prescription, only 9.3% were prescribed by a surgeon's office. Conclusions: Patients who undergo thumb basal joint arthroplasty with preoperative opioid use have much greater odds of filling a second opioid prescription and prolonged use after the surgery. Low initial surgeon-provided opioid dosages did not correlate to filling a second prescription, indicating that lower initial doses are feasible. Finally, nearly all opioid-naïve patients who filled a second opioid prescription received them from providers other than a surgeon, indicating the need for greater communication with nonsurgical providers simultaneously caring for patients in the perioperative period. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

RESUMO

Purpose: Wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery has gained popularity because of its cost savings, safety, favorable outcomes, and high patient satisfaction. However, the wide-awake nature of the technique causes many patients to experience anxiety during the procedure. Nonorthopedic studies have reported the anxiolytic effects of intraprocedural music in a variety of wide-awake medical procedures. This prospective randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of wearing noise-canceling headphones and listening to music on patient anxiety during WALANT hand surgery. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients were randomized to one of the following groups: (1) a headphones group that wore noise-canceling headphones and listened to music (genre of their choice) during the surgery, or (2) a control group that neither wore noise-canceling headphones nor listened to music during surgery. Patient anxiety was assessed on a 10-point visual analog scale before, during, and after surgery. All patients completed an overall experience questionnaire after surgery. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, with 25 in each group. Both the groups were similar in terms of patient characteristics, diagnosed anxiety, and preoperative level of anxiety. The headphones group was found to have significantly less intraoperative anxiety (1.02 vs 2.32, respectively; P = .017) and a significantly greater net decrease in anxiety from the preoperative to intraoperative level (-1.78 vs -0.56, respectively; P = .033) than the control group. In the headphones group, 92% (23/25) of patients stated that they would recommend wearing noise-canceling headphones and listening to music to other WALANT hand surgery patients. All (50/50) patients in both groups reported that they would choose to undergo WALANT hand surgery again if needed for the same problem. Conclusions: The use of noise-canceling headphones with music during WALANT hand surgery significantly decreases intraoperative patient anxiety. This intervention represents an effective, safe, and inexpensive nonpharmacologic measure to improve patient anxiety and overall experience with WALANT hand surgery. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I.