RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High-grade gliomas cause cognitive impairment in those who suffer from them. However, there is a lack of precise data describing the cognitive deficit that occurs in this population, which would allow to better focus neuropsychological evaluations and make better clinical decisions in favor of the patient's recovery and quality of life. For this purpose, a systematic review of the literature was carried out to search for studies on neurocognitive alterations in patients with malignant brain tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review was conducted under the criteria of the PRISMA guideline for reporting systematic review and meta-analysis reports, with a search of the PubMed database (MEDLINE). Descriptive and analytical observational studies between 2015 and 2020 were considered. RESULTS: 506 articles were identified, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria and were selected in the qualitative synthesis and described in the manuscript. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade gliomas cause significant alterations in cognitive domains such as language, attention, memory, empathy and executive functions. However, more studies focused on describing the neuropsychological alterations in this population are needed in order to make better clinical treatment and rehabilitation decisions.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 virus infection may affect other organs including the nervous system with variable neurological manifestations, even some research has reported that SARS-CoV-2 can be found in the brain parenchyma and / or in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Although these reports of neurological involvement secondary to COVID-19 has increased, the clinical manifestations and the forms of neurological invasion is not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we report a case series of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection with involvement of the nervous system and its neurological complications. In addition, a bibliographic review was developed in different databases with the aim of expanding information on neurological complications and the pathophysiological mechanisms of invasion to the nervous system. CASE REPORT: Case 1, a 79 year old male developed an infarct of the head of the caudate nucleus and thrombosis of the superior longitudinal sinus. Case 2, a 62 year old female developed an intraparenchymal hemorrhage in the left parietal lobe while hospitalized and COVID19 encephalitis was diagnosed. Case 3, a 59 year old healthy male developed a Fisher IV subarachnoid hemorrhage by aneurysmal origin of the right middle cerebral artery and right temporal intraparenchymal hematoma, due to rapid and severe neurological impairment new brain images was performed showing a right cerebellar ischemic stroke leading to compression of the cistern and brainstem. CONCLUSIONS: In these cases, the surgery goal was relieved symptoms, neurologic functional recovery, and life survival. We considered its diffusion and knowledge as imperative for all practitioners involved in the care of this patient.

RESUMO

El síndrome de cola de caballo (SCC) es una urgencia quirúrgica poco frecuente con una incidencia estimada de hasta 1,8 casos por millón de habitantes, producida por la compresión de las raíces nerviosas en el extremo inferior del canal espinal. La manipulación espinal puede desempeñar un papel etiogénico, provocando la movilización y extrusión del disco. El diagnóstico temprano y el tratamiento oportuno son cruciales, ya que el pronóstico suele ser desfavorable si el tratamiento quirúrgico se retrasa produciendo un daño neurológico permanente. El objetivo de este trabajo es identificar los potenciales factores de riesgo para la manipulación espinal y optimizar esta práctica, evitando así posibles complicaciones derivadas del tratamiento quiropráctico. Presentamos 3 casos de SCC, observados y tratados en nuestro centro, en los que se sugiere una estrecha relación entre la manipulación espinal quiropráctica y la aparición de dicho síndrome. Tras realizarles una RM en la que se observó una hernia discal L5-S1 causante del SCC, los 3 pacientes fueron tratados quirúrgicamente de forma urgente. Los casos presentados demostraron la existencia de una asociación patogénica entre la manipulación espinal y el desarrollo del SCC, al producirse dicho síndrome en las horas siguientes a la manipulación debida a la protusión abrupta de un disco demostrado por RM.

Introduction: Cauda equine syndrome (CES) is a rare surgical emergency with an estimated incidence of up to 1.8 cases per million. It is caused by compression of the nerve roots at the lowest point of the spinal canal. Spinal manipulation can play a pathogenic role, resulting in mobilization and extrusion of the disc. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are crucial, since the prognosis is usually unfavorable and permanent neurological damage likely if surgical treatment is delayed. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify potential risk factors associated with spinal manipulation and, thereby, optimize this practice to reduce the risk of complications from chiropractic treatment. Methods: We present three cases of CES, observed and treated at our center, in which a close relationship between chiropractic spinal manipulation and the appearance of CES was apparent. Results: After magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an L5-S1 herniated disc causing the SCC, all three patients underwent urgent surgical treatment. Conclusion: The three presented cases demonstrate a strong pathogenic relationship between spinal manipulation and the development of CES, when this syndrome occurs within hours of spinal manipulation, secondary to MRI-documented acute disc protrusion.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: Los accidentes biológicos representan un riesgo ocupacional significativo para los trabajadores de la salud, y para los estudiantes de medicina. Objetivos: Establecer la prevalencia de accidentes biológicos y los factores y comportamientos asociados en la población de estudiantes de medicina. Materiales y métodos: Se encuestaron los estudiantes de medicina del área clínica de la Universidad Industrial de Santander. El instrumento de encuesta preguntaba sobre utilización de elementos de protección, caracterización y comportamientos asociados al último accidente biológico sufrido. La información obtenida fue analizada mediante porcentajes y promedios. Para evaluar los factores asociados al accidente se calcularon Razones de Prevalencia y sus IC 95%. Resultados: Se encuestaron 330 estudiantes. El uso rutinario de guantes se reportó en un 99,3%, de doble guante en 13,9%, tapabocas en 77,4% y de gafas en 30,7%. La prevalencia de accidentes biológicos fue de 18%, la cual aumentaba de acuerdo al año de estudio. El accidente no fue reportado en 48% de los casos. Se encontró una asociación positiva entre el sufrimiento de al menos un accidente biológico durante lo cursado de la carrera y el uso completo de medidas de protección en tercer y cuarto año, RP=2,92 (IC 95% 0,95 – 8,93); y negativa para quinto y sexto año, RP=0,84 (IC 95% 0,50-1,41, p=0,0479). Conclusiones: Los accidentes biológicos son frecuentes en nuestros estudiantes de medicina. Se debe insistir desde los primeros semestres en la importancia del uso de elementos de protección, el reporte del accidente y los protocolos postexposición.

Introduction: Biological accidents represent a significant occupational risk to healthcare workers including medical students. Objectives: To establish the prevalence of biological accidents, and its associated factors and behaviors among medical students. Materials and methods: Medical students in clinical clerkships from Universidad Industrial de Santander were surveyed. The survey instrument asked about the use of protective elements, the characteristics and behaviors associated to the last biological accident suffered by the student. Gathered data were analyzed as percentages and means. To evaluate associated factors, Prevalence Ratios and its CI 95% were calculated. Results: Three hundred thirty students were surveyed. Routine use of gloves was reported by 99.3%, double gloving by 13.9%, disposable masks by 77.4% and protective eyewear by 30.7%. Prevalence of biological accidents was 18.0%, which increased with seniority. Accidents were not reported to the occupational health office in 48% of cases. A positive association was found between suffering at least one accident during the career and the complete use of protective elements in third and fourth year students, PR=2.92 (CI 95% 0.95-8.93); while for fifth and sixth year students it was negative, PR=0.84 (CI 95% 0.50-1.41, p=0.0479). Conclusions: Biological accidents are frequent among our medical students. The importance of using protective elements must be emphasized during the first years of training. Medical students must be educated about the key role of reporting accidents and about post-exposure protocols.

Assuntos