RESUMO
Fifty-one Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were differentiated into 21 types by ribotyping. Several enzyme combinations, including the best ones proposed in literature, were utilized and the highest discrimination was reached by individual digestion with PvuII, HindII, and EcoRI or BamHI. Clinical isolates from outbreaks were clonally related as identified by this molecular approach. Restriction rDNA profiles were composed of strong and weak bands. Using 6 micrograms DNA we were able to demonstrate that PvuII, HindIII, and BamHI weak bands were reproducible. These weak bands should be considered not only to accomplish the highest discrimination but also to correctly assign isolate clonality. Conversely, we found that EcoRI weak bands were not reproducible and, therefore, are not recommended for ribotype analysis. Finally, profiles differing in one single band actually represented isolates of different genotype, as confirmed by further analysis using other molecular methods. In this report on P. Aeruginosa ribotyping of clinical isolates, criteria for band pattern interpretation are established.
Assuntos
DNA Ribossômico/análise , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana/normas , Southern Blotting , Epidemiologia Molecular , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Óperon , Polimorfismo de Fragmento de Restrição , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Mapeamento por RestriçãoRESUMO
Ribotype, biotype and resistance phenotype were used to characterize 37 Acinetobacter baumannii-A. calcoaceticus complex isolates responsible for nosocomial infections in Buenos Aires. Nineteen isolates were recovered from endemic infections at 2 hospitals and 18 represent an intensive care unit outbreak that occurred in a third hospital. By ribotyping isolates were classified into five different clones of A. baumannii biotype 2, 3 of A. baumannii biotype 9, and 3 of Acinetobacter genospecies 13. Combination of the three epidemiological markers permitted categorization of 18 outbreak isolates into four probable strains: 2 A. baumannii biotype 2, named type I, and II, and 2 A. baumannii biotype 9. Type I (15 isolates) was the most prevalent strain at one hospital and was responsible for the outbreak. In conclusion, combined analysis of biotypes, resistance phenotypes, and ribotypes was an accurate approach for epidemiologic investigation of A. baumannii. Furthermore, ribotyping discriminated Acinetobacter genospecies 13 isolates which were phenotypically difficult to type.