RESUMO
PURPOSE: Left atrial volume is an important predictor of future arrhythmias, and it can be assessed by several different methods. Simpson's method is well accepted as a reference standard, although no standardization exists for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to compare the estimations of left atrial volumes obtained by the Simpson's method with three other methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients referred for CMR imaging between February 2007 and May 2010 were included in the study (47 males; mean age, 59.4±11.5 years; body mass index, 26.3±3.7 kg/m(2)). Left atrial volume measurements were performed using the Simpson's, biplane area-length, ellipse, and three-dimensional methods. Results were correlated using a Bland-Altman plot and linear regression models and compared by two-tailed paired-sample t tests. Reader variability was also calculated. RESULTS: Left atrial volume measurements using the biplane area-length technique showed the best correlation with Simpson's method (r=0.92; P < 0.001). Quantification values using the ellipse and three-dimensional methods were significantly different than values obtained using the Simpson's method (P < 0.05, for both). All methods showed excellent observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient >0.99). CONCLUSION: The biplane area-length method can be used for left atrial volume measurement when the Simpson's method cannot be performed. If these two methods are not feasible, then all methods are highly reproducible and can be used, but should not be used interchangeably for follow-up studies.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografia Tridimensional/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Volume Sistólico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Átrios do Coração/patologia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between "Look-Locker" (LL) and modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) approaches for T1 mapping of the myocardium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 168 myocardial T1 maps using MOLLI and 165 maps using LL were obtained in human subjects at 1.5 Tesla. The T1 values of the myocardium were calculated before and at five time points after gadolinium administration. All time and heart rate normalizations were done. The T1 values obtained were compared to determine the absolute and bias agreement. RESULTS: The precontrast global T1 values were similar when measured by the LL and by MOLLI technique (mean, 1004.9 ms ± 120.3 versus 1034.1 ms ± 53.1, respectively, P = 0.26). Postcontrast myocardial T1 time from LL was significantly longer than MOLLI from 5 to 25 min (mean difference, LL - MOLLI was +61.8 ± 46.4 ms, P < 0.001). No significant differences in T1 values were noted between long and short axis measurements for either MOLLI or LL. CONCLUSION: Postcontrast LL and MOLLI showed very good agreement, although LL values are higher than MOLLI. Precontrast T1 values showed good agreement, however LL has greater limits of agreement. Short and long axis planes can reliably assess T1 values.