RESUMO
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. To reduce lung cancer mortality and detect lung cancer in early stages, low dose CT screening is required. A meta-analysis was conducted to verify whether screening could reduce lung cancer mortality and to determine the optimal screening program. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, ScienceDirect, and relevant Chinese databases. Randomized controlled trial studies with participants that were smokers older than 49 years (smoking >15 years or quit smoking 10 or 15 years ago) were included. RESULTS Nine RCT studies met the criteria. LDCT screening could find more lung cancer cases (RR=1.58, 95%CI=1.25-1.99, P<0.001) and more stage I lung cancers (RR=3.45, 95%CI=2.08-5.72, P<0.001) compared to chest-X ray or the no screening group. This indicated a statistically significant reduction in lung-cancer-specific mortality (RR=0.84, 95%CI=0.75-0.95, P=0.004), but without a statistically reduction in mortality due to all causes (RR=1.26, 95%CI=0.89-1.78, P=0.193). Annually, LDCT screening was sensitive in finding more lung cancers. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose CT screening is effective in finding more lung cancer cases and decreasing the deaths from lung cancer. Annual low-dose CT screening may be better than a biennial screening to detect more early-stage lung cancer cases.
RESUMO OBJETIVO O câncer de pulmão é a principal causa de mortes relacionadas ao câncer. Para reduzir a mortalidade por câncer de pulmão e encontrar câncer de pulmão em um estágio inicial, é necessária uma triagem por tomografia de baixa dose. Uma meta-análise foi emitida para testemunhar se a triagem poderia reduzir a mortalidade por câncer de pulmão e investigar o melhor programa de triagem. MÉTODOS Pesquisamos PubMed, Web of Science, biblioteca Cochrane, ScienceDirect e relevante banco de dados chinês. Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios, em que os participantes eram fumantes com mais de 49 anos (tabagismo >15 anos ou parar de fumar 10 ou 15 anos atrás) foram incluídos. RESULTADOS Nove estudos RCT preencheram os critérios. O rastreamento de LDCT pôde encontrar mais cânceres de pulmão (RR=1,58, IC 95%=1,25-1,99, P<0,001) e mais cânceres de estágio I do pulmão (RR=3,45, IC 95%=2,08-5,72, P<0,001) em comparação com raio X do tórax ou nenhum grupo de triagem. Ele indicou uma redução estatisticamente significativa na mortalidade específica do câncer de pulmão (RR=0,84, IC 95%=0,75-0,95, P=0,004), mas sem uma redução estatisticamente significativa na mortalidade por todas as causas (RR=1,26, IC 95%=0,89-1,78, P=0,193). Anualmente, o rastreamento de LDCT foi sensível em encontrar mais cânceres de pulmão. CONCLUSÕES A triagem de TC de baixa dose é eficaz para encontrar mais cânceres de pulmão e diminuir as mortes por câncer de pulmão. Para encontrar mais cânceres de pulmão em estágio inicial, a triagem anual de tomografia de baixa dose pode ser melhor do que a triagem bianual.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Programas de Rastreamento , Fatores de Risco , Detecção Precoce de CâncerRESUMO
Previous epidemiological investigations have evaluated the association between gout, serum uric acid levels, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), but with inconsistent results. We conducted this meta-analysis aiming at providing clear evidence about whether OSAS patients have higher serum uric acid levels and more susceptible to gout. Relevant studies were identified via electronic databases from inception to December 17, 2018. Study selection was conducted according to predesigned eligibility criteria, and two authors independently extracted data from included studies. The hazard ratio (HR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived using random-effects models. We conducted meta-, heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses. Eighteen studies, involving a total of 157,607 individuals (32,395 with OSAS, 125,212 without OSAS) and 12,262 gout cases, were included. Results show that serum uric acid levels are elevated in patients with OSAS (WMD = 52.25, 95% CI 36.16-64.33); OSAS did not reach statistical significance as a predictor of gout (but there was a trend, HR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.91-1.70) and that the association between OSAS and serum uric acid was quite robust. OSAS may be a potential risk factor for hyperuricemia and the development of gout and thus, effective OSAS therapy may present as a valuable preventive measure against gout. Still, it is vital to undertake clinical studies with better designing to corroborate these associations and shed new light on it.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Gota/fisiopatologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia , Ácido Úrico/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Brasil , Correlação de Dados , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PolissonografiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. To reduce lung cancer mortality and detect lung cancer in early stages, low dose CT screening is required. A meta-analysis was conducted to verify whether screening could reduce lung cancer mortality and to determine the optimal screening program. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, ScienceDirect, and relevant Chinese databases. Randomized controlled trial studies with participants that were smokers older than 49 years (smoking >15 years or quit smoking 10 or 15 years ago) were included. RESULTS: Nine RCT studies met the criteria. LDCT screening could find more lung cancer cases (RR=1.58, 95%CI=1.25-1.99, P<0.001) and more stage I lung cancers (RR=3.45, 95%CI=2.08-5.72, P<0.001) compared to chest-X ray or the no screening group. This indicated a statistically significant reduction in lung-cancer-specific mortality (RR=0.84, 95%CI=0.75-0.95, P=0.004), but without a statistically reduction in mortality due to all causes (RR=1.26, 95%CI=0.89-1.78, P=0.193). Annually, LDCT screening was sensitive in finding more lung cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT screening is effective in finding more lung cancer cases and decreasing the deaths from lung cancer. Annual low-dose CT screening may be better than a biennial screening to detect more early-stage lung cancer cases.