RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Vaccination is an effective intervention for reduce child morbidity and mortality associated to pneumococcus. The availability of new anti-pneumococcal vaccines makes it necessary to evaluate its potential impact on public health and costs related to their implementation. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of immunization strategies based on pneumococcal conjugated vaccines (PCV's) currently available in Mexico from a third payer perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to assess both, economic and health impact, of anti-pneumococcal vaccination in children <2 years (lifetime time horizon, discount rate: 5% annual). Comparators were: no-vaccination (reference) and strategies based on 7, 10 and 13-valent PCV's. Effectiveness measures were: child deaths avoided, life-years gained (LYG) and quality adjusted life years (QALY's) gained. Effectiveness, utility, local epidemiology and cost of treating pneumococcal diseases were extracted from published sources. Univariate sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Immunization dominates no-vaccination: strategy based on 13-valent vaccine prevented 16.205 deaths, gained 331.230 LY's and 332.006 QALY's and saved US$1.307/child vaccinated. Strategies based on 7 and 10-valent PCV's prevented 13.806 and 5.589 deaths, gained 282.193 and 114.251 LY's, 282.969 and 114.972 QALY's and saved US$1.084 and US$731/child vaccinated, respectively. These results were robust to variations in herd immunity and lower immunogenicity of 10-valent vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, immunization strategies based on 7, 10 and 13-valent PCV's would be cost-saving interventions, however, health outcomes and savings of the strategy based on 13-valent vaccine are greater than those estimated for 7 and 10-valent PCV's.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/economia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Vacina Pneumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , México , Modelos Econômicos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinas Conjugadas/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare costs and health benefits of three prophylactic interventions recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and to help quantify the impact of illness and enhance the physicians' ability to make informed decisions. STUDY DESIGN: Medline search was conducted of English-language cost-effectiveness studies of varicella and pneumococcal conjugate vaccination recommended for all healthy infants and of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis with palivizumab (Synagis) for infants at high risk for severe RSV infection. Data were collected on cost-effectiveness, burden of illness, and efficacy and analyzed from the societal and payer perspective. Results were discounted by 5% and costs inflated to year 2002 dollars. RESULTS: From the societal perspective, estimates of cost per life-years saved were money savings for varicella, 175,300 US dollars for pneumococcal conjugate vaccination, and 66,200 US dollars for palivizumab prophylaxis; from the payer perspective, estimates were 28,100, 338,400, and 66,400 US dollars, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness estimates for varicella and pneumococcal conjugate vaccination demonstrate that evaluating economic benefits from the societal rather than the payer perspective makes universal prophylaxis very financially attractive. By comparison, this same differential does not exist for the cost-effectiveness estimates of palivizumab from the societal and payer perspectives because its use is in a well-defined high-risk target population. From a societal perspective, prophylaxis is a rational public policy decision, although in target populations, incidence of serious illness and the primary cost components driving the cost offsets vary across prophylactic measures studied.