RESUMO
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] was discovered by Kare Berg in 1963 from the study of low-density lipoprotein genetic variants. Lp(a) contains a unique protein, apolipoprotein(a), which is linked to the Apo B-100 through a disulfide bond that gives it a great structural homology with plasminogen, and confers it atherogenic and atherothrombotic properties. Interest in Lp(a) has increased because an important association between high plasma levels of Lp(a) and coronary artery disease and cerebral vascular disorders has been demonstrated. Numerous case control studies have confirmed that hyper-Lp(a) is a risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) is identified as a genetic trait with autosomal transmission, codified by one of the most studied polymorphic genes in humans. It has been demonstrated that variations in this gene are a major factor in the serum levels of Lp(a). Variations differ considerably between individuals and sex across populations. Various approaches to drug treatment using fibric acid derivatives, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, alcohol extracted soy protein, niacin, and exercise have been proven to decrease Lp(a) in high risk patients, but none has really been an effective therapeutic option for successfully reducing Lp(a) plasma levels.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Hiperlipoproteinemias/complicações , Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/etiologia , Transtornos Cerebrovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperlipoproteinemias/tratamento farmacológico , Lipoproteína(a)/efeitos dos fármacos , Lipoproteína(a)/genética , Masculino , Polimorfismo Genético , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death worldwide. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease in which concentrations are genetically regulated. Contradictory results have been published about physical activity influence on Lp(a) concentration. This research aimed to determine associations between different physical activity levels and Lp(a) concentration. A descriptive and cross-sectional study was made in 1340 randomly selected subjects (males = 598; females = 712) to whom a complete clinical history, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and Lp(a) level determination were made. Statistical analysis was carried out to assess qualitative variables relationship by chi2 and differences between means by one-way analysis of variance considering a P value <0.05 as statistically significant. Results are shown as absolute frequencies, percentages, and mean +/- standard deviation according to case. Physical activity levels were ordinal classified as follows: low activity with 24.3% (n = 318), moderate activity with 35.0% (n = 458), and high physical activity with 40.8% (n = 534). Lp(a) concentration in the studied sample was 26.28 +/- 12.64 (IC: 25.59-26.96) mg/dL. Lp(a) concentration according to low, moderate, and high physical activity levels were 29.22 +/- 13.74, 26.27 +/- 12.91, and 24.53 +/- 11.35 mg/dL, respectively, observing statistically significant differences between low and moderate level (P = 0.004) and low and high level (P < 0.001). A strong association (chi2 = 9.771; P = 0.002) was observed among a high physical activity level and a normal concentration of Lp(a) (less than 30 mg/dL). A lifestyle characterized by high physical activity is associated with normal Lp(a) levels.
Assuntos
Estilo de Vida , Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Animais , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Venezuela , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aims of this study were to determine Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in a sample of subjects from Maracaibo, Venezuela, and to determine the relationship of family risk factors for cardiovascular disease and their Lp(a) levels. Two hundred twenty-seven healthy individuals between 5 and 19 years of age of both genders and multiethnic origins were selected. A complete background clinical chart and laboratory test was conducted for each patient to discard cardiovascular diseases and confirm their healthy state. The Lp(a) concentration was determined using the double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. For inferential statistical analysis, one-factor analysis of variance tests and Student t test for independent observations were used according to each case, considered significant when P value was <0.05. No significant differences were observed when evaluating Lp(a) levels according to gender in all ages. Males showed no significant difference in Lp(a) levels between groups, but, in females, a significantly lower level (P < 0.03) in the group 5 to 9 years of age was found. When considering only age, significantly lower levels were observed (P < 0.03) in the 5- to 9-year-old group. When studying family risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, it was found that the group with family risk factors had a significantly higher Lp(a) concentration (P < 0.01) than those without family risk factors, observing that those who had four or more factors exhibited a significantly higher concentration than those with two to three risk factors (30.6 +/- 4.5 mg/dL versus 18.5 +/- 12.2 mg/dL, P < 0.009) and than those with one risk factor (30.6 +/- 4.5 mg/dL versus 21.6 +/- 1.4 mg/dL, P < 0.03). These results emphasize the clusters of family risk factors of cardiovascular disease with higher Lp(a) levels and also indicate that the evaluation of its concentration should be taken as an independent risk factor of atherosclerosis for the population in developmental ages.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Aterosclerose/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Venezuela/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Celiac disease (CD) susceptibility has been strongly associated with HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. The main objective of this study was to assess the distribution of HLA DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 alleles (DQ2) for the first time in a group of Cuban celiac patients. We evaluated 22 patients, 54 first-degree relatives, and 60 controls for detection of antitissue transglutaminase (tTG)-specific antibodies in serum. We found that 100% of the probands and 19% of the first-degree relatives were positive for the antibodies in serum. We did not detect any specific response for the healthy control individuals. We observed a significant over-representation of DQ2 heterodimer, both in patients and relatives. In the group of patients, 86.3% were positive for DQA1*0501, 90.2% were positive for DQB1*02, and 86.3% were positive for both alleles. The frequencies in relatives and controls were as follows: 70%, 90%, and 70%; and 56.6%, 45%, and 20%, respectively. In conclusion, we found that the proportion of our celiac patients carrying DQ2 was similar to the proportion of CD patients reported in populations with different genetic backgrounds. These results underline the primary importance of HLA-DQ alleles in susceptibility to celiac disease.
Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Antígenos HLA-DQ/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cuba , Feminino , Cadeias alfa de HLA-DQ , Cadeias beta de HLA-DQ , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Altas concentraciones de Lipoproteína (a) [Lp)a)] son consideradas un factor de riesgo independiente para la enfermedad cardiovascular, sin embargo su determinación no se realiza como prueba de rutina en la evaluación de dicho riesgo. El propósito de este estudio fue determinar los niveles séricos de Lp(a) en individuos de las poblaciones de Maracaibo, una localidad con predominio blanco-hispánico, y de Bobures, una localidad afrovenezolana, ambas ubicadas en el Estado Zulia, Venezuela. para ello se seleccionaron al azar un total de 112 individuos, 57 de Maracaibo (edad promedio 41,8 ± 13,5 años), y 55 de Bobures (edad promedio 31,4 ± 17,4 años) a los cuales se les determinó en condiciones basales glicemia, perfil lípidico y Lp(a). Para la cuantificación sérica de Lp(a) fue utilizado un Kit comercial basado en ELISA de doble anticuerpo monoclonal contra apo-B100 y contra apo(a) (Heber Biotech BioSCREEN Lp(a), La Habana, Cuba). El colesterol total y el colesterol de HDL fueron significativamente más elevados en los individuos de Maracaibo que en los de Bobures (p<0.009 y p<0.001 respectivamente), mientras que los niveles de Lp(a) séricos fueron significativamente más elevados (p<0.001 en la población afrovenezolana (media de 59,0 mg/dl) que en los blancos hispánicos) (media de 29,0 mg/dl). Nuestros rsultados sugieren que la población afrovenezolana estudiada al tener concentraciones de Lp(a) dos veces más elevada que la muestra de blancos-hispánicos estudiados y por encima del rango normal de 30 mg/dl, tienen un mayor riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular, por lo tanto deben ser realizados estudios destinados a determinar de los subtipos de Lp(a) presentes en esta población
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Anticorpos , Doenças Cardiovasculares , População Negra/genética , Lipoproteína(a)/análise , Farmacologia , Terapêutica , VenezuelaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to assess the presence of celiac disease (CD) in patients with giardiasis and to evaluate the tools for diagnosis of CD in these patients. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with giardiasis were evaluated. Celiac disease was confirmed or discarded by intestinal biopsy and serological markers. Antigliadin antibodies were determined by ELISA and antitransglutaminase antibodies by one-step immunochromatographic assay and ELISA. RESULTS: Out of the 40 patients with giardiasis 37 showed normal intestinal mucosa. In this group, IgA antibodies to gliadin were positive in 7 patients, yielding a specificity of 82%. All of them were negative for transglutaminase antibodies by the immunochromatographic assay and by ELISA (specificity of 100%). The remaining 3 patients showed a subtotal intestinal villous atrophy consistent with CD, however, only two presented IgA antibodies to transglutaminase and gliadin. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its low specificity antigliadin antibodies are not useful for the screening of CD in patients with giardiasis. On the other hand, antitransglutaminase antibodies are highly specific and sensitive. One-step immunochromatographic assay is an easy and economic alternative. The findings of villous atrophy must be supported by other markers of CD to achieve the diagnosis of CD in these patients.