RESUMO
Introduction: Obesity is a chronic medical condition that affects, among others, the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Interventions for its treatment focus on sustained weight reduction and general health improvement, leaving respiratory management aside. Our objective was to determine the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in patients with obesity. Methods: A systematic review was performed in Embase, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), CINAHL, Web of Science, and PubMed/MEDLINE on June 26, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and quasi-randomized clinical trials investigating the effects of IMT in people with obesity were included. Selected studies were screened by two independent reviewers who extracted data and assessed the quality of the evidence. Results: The initial search returned 705 potential studies were included. Ultimately, eight studies met the criteria for eligibility and were included in the review. IMT improves physical capacity [6-minute walk test (6MWT): 44.5 m, 95% CI: 30.5 to 58.5; p < 0.0001] and the strength of the inspiratory muscles [maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP): -28.4 cm H2O, 95% CI: -41.9 to -14.8; p < 0.0001] compared to the controls, without differences in the pulmonary function, body mass index (BMI) and metabolic parameters. Conclusion: Inspiratory muscle training improves physical capacity and inspiratory muscle strength without significant changes in lung function, BMI, and metabolic parameters.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023439625, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023439625.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Exercise capacity has been established as a protective factor against joint impairment in people with haemophilia (PWH). However, little is known about how exercise capacity is affected in PWH. AIM: To analyse exercise capacity, as assessed by standardised laboratory or field tests in PWH. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify manuscripts investigating physical capacity in PWH. An electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and CINAHL was conducted from inception to 13 April, 2022. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed study quality using the critical appraisal tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Nineteen studies with 825 patients were included. Most studies used the six-min walk test (6MWT) or peak/maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max). In children, the distance walked ranged from 274 ± 36.02 to 680 ± 100 m. In adults, the distance walked ranged from 457.5 ± 96.9 to 650.9 ± 180.3 m. VO2 max ranged from 37 ± 8 to 47.42 ± 8.29 ml kg-1 min-1 . Most studies reported lower values of exercise capacity compared to standardised values. Overall, the quality of the studies was moderate. CONCLUSION: Most of the studies showed that PWH have lower exercise capacity compared to reference values of 6MWT or VO2 max. Based on these results, it is necessary to emphasise in both the promotion and the prescription of physical exercise in PWH.
Assuntos
Tolerância ao Exercício , Hemofilia A , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Exercício Físico , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , CaminhadaRESUMO
Background: Effective treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) include positive pressure, weight loss, oral appliances, surgery, and exercise. Although the involvement of the respiratory muscles in OSA is evident, the effect of training them to improve clinical outcomes is not clear. We aimed to determine the effects of respiratory muscle training in patients with OSA. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in seven databases. Studies that applied respiratory muscle training in OSA patients were reviewed. Two independent reviewers analysed the studies, extracted the data and assessed the quality of evidence. Results: Of the 405 reports returned by the initial search, eight articles reporting on 210 patients were included in the data synthesis. Seven included inspiratory muscle training (IMT), and one included expiratory muscle training (EMT). Regarding IMT, we found significant improvement in Epworth sleepiness scale in −4.45 points (95%CI −7.64 to −1.27 points, p = 0.006), in Pittsburgh sleep quality index of −2.79 points (95%CI −4.19 to −1.39 points, p < 0.0001), and maximum inspiratory pressure of −29.56 cmH2O (95%CI −53.14 to −5.98 cmH2O, p = 0.01). However, the apnoea/hypopnea index and physical capacity did not show changes. We did not perform a meta-analysis of EMT due to insufficient studies. Conclusion: IMT improves sleepiness, sleep quality and inspiratory strength in patients with OSA.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease has provoked much discussion since its first appearance. Despite it being widely studied all over the world, little is known about the impact of the disease on functional ability related to performing activities of daily living (ADL) in patients post COVID-19 infection. OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of COVID-19 on ADL performance of adult patients and to describe the common scales used to assess performance of ADL on patients post-COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. We included studies that applied a physical capacity test in COVID-19 patients, post-infection. Two independent reviewers analyzed the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: A total of 1,228 studies were included, after removing duplicates, 1,005 abstracts were screened and of those 983 were excluded. A final number of nine studies which met the eligibility criteria were included. The findings revealed worsening of physical function and ADL performance in all patients post COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: All included studies found a reduction of ADL beyond the test or scale used, revealing a vital worsening of functional ability in ADL performance and consequently loss of independence in COVID-19 patients after the acute phase of infection. Functional ability status previous to COVID-19 is crucial for predicting the severity of the disease and mortality. Barthel Index and ADL score were the most used assessment tools across subjects with different intrinsic capacity and context levels.
RESUMO
La evaluación de la capacidad respiratoria y funcional en pacientes con COVID-19 después de la fase aguda es esencial para estimar el impacto de los deterioros causados por la enfermedad en el nivel de funcionamiento relacionados con las actividades y tareas y su impacto en la participación. Esta información provee evidencia invaluable del impacto de la enfermedad para implementar las estrategias de rehabilitación más adecuadas. El objetivo de esta revisión es determinar cuáles son las mejores herramientas para evaluar la capacidad respiratoria y funcional en personas post-infección por COVID-19, para ello, se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura incluyendo estudios que aplicaron evaluaciones respiratorias y funcionales en pacientes post-infección por COVID-19. Se encontró que las herramientas más utilizadas para evaluar la función respiratoria fueron la capacidad de difusión y la espirometría. Para evaluar la capacidad funcional, las pruebas más utilizadas fueron el test de marcha de 6 minutos, el Sit-to-Stand test, Short Performance Physical Battery y el índice de Barthel. Finalmente, dada la heterogeneidad de la presentación clínica de la COVID-19, es fundamental contar con herramientas sencillas para evaluar y monitorizar las consecuencias de la enfermedad en la función respiratoria y el estado funcional de los pacientes.
The assessment of respiratory and functional capacity in patients with COVID-19 after the acute phase is essential to estimate the impact of the disease's impairments on functioning related to the activities and tasks and their impact on participation. This information provides invaluable evidence of the impact of the disease to implement the most appropriate rehabilitation strategies. This review aims to determine the best tests to assess people's respiratory and functional capacity after COVID-19 infection. A narrative review of the literature was carried out that includes studies that applied respiratory and functional assessment in post-COVID-19 infection patients. It was found that the most used tests to assess respiratory function were diffusion capacity and spirometry. The most widely used tests to assess functional capacity were the 6-minutes walk test, the Sit-to-Stand test, the Short Performance Physical Battery, and the Barthel index. Finally, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation of COVID-19, it is essential to have simple tests to assess and monitor the consequences of the disease on patients' respiratory function and functional status.