RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of abortions provided to patients from Texas in New Mexico before and after the 2013 enactment of Texas House Bill 2 (HB2), an omnibus bill of abortion restrictions, and to compare the gestational ages at which Texans presented for abortion in New Mexico before and after HB2. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a chart review of Texas and New Mexico patients obtaining an abortion in New Mexico abortion clinics before HB 2 was signed and implemented (time period 1: January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012) and after HB 2 went into effect (time period 2: May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2015). We used random sampling of corresponding 7-day periods (by week number during the one-year sample) to obtain data until we reached the desired sample of at least 300 patients. We compared proportions of individuals from Texas obtaining abortions and the gestational age at which they presented in the two time periods. RESULTS: We abstracted data from 350 and 300 Texas and New Mexico patients, respectively. The proportion of procedures provided to women from Texas increased from 10 (3%) pre-HB2 to 43 (14%) post-HB2 (p < 0.0001). The proportion of procedures in Texas patients at 13 to ≤24 weeks increased from 1 of 29 (3%) pre-HB2 to 10 of 38 (26%) post-HB2 (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: The proportion of Texans scheduling abortions in New Mexico within the first 24 weeks of gestation increased after passage of HB2. Restrictive legislation may force more people to travel across state lines to obtain abortion care. IMPLICATIONS: Patients residing in Texas and seeking abortion care in Texas experienced barriers to abortion care, likely related to restrictions imposed by HB2.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Legal , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Feminino , Humanos , New Mexico , Gravidez , Texas , ViagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine if postpartum contraceptive choices by primiparous women differ by ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective nested cohort study analyzing women's characteristics and contraceptive choice. RESULTS: Of 652 participants, 312 (47.8%) were Hispanic, 287 (44.0%) were non-Hispanic white, and 53 (8.1%) were American Indian (AI). In multivariate analysis, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and intrauterine device (IUD)/implant choice was related to AI [DMPA: odds ratio (OR) 15.28, confidence interval (CI) 4.49-52.04; IUD/implant: OR 0.46, CI 0.22-0.92] and Hispanic (DMPA: OR 3.44, CI 1.12-10.58) ethnicity. CONCLUSION: DMPA use was higher among Hispanic and AI women and IUD/implant use lower in AI women compared to non-Hispanic white women.
Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepcionais Orais/administração & dosagem , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administração & dosagem , Período Pós-Parto , Adulto , Comportamento de Escolha , Estudos de Coortes , Preservativos , Comportamento Contraceptivo/etnologia , Implantes de Medicamento , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Hospitais Universitários , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Comportamento Materno/etnologia , New Mexico , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Branca , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of preprocedure misoprostol on intrauterine device (IUD) placement in nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized controlled double-blind trial at the University of New Mexico reproductive health clinic, nulliparous women requesting an IUD were randomized to 400 mcg of buccal misoprostol or placebo 2-8 hours before insertion. Primary outcomes included pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale and women's perception of the value of delaying insertion for an effective medication. Provider ease of insertion and need for adjunctive insertion measures were also assessed, on a visual analog scale. Participants indicated maximum pain after IUD insertion, pain level they would tolerate to avoid delay in IUD insertion, and preference for IUD insertion without delay if an effective medication was available. RESULTS: Of 85 women enrolled, 3 were ineligible; 42 were randomized to misoprostol and 40 to placebo. There were no differences between groups in worst insertion pain, (5.8 ± 2.0 vs 5.9 ± 2.0, P = .94), provider ease of insertion (2.2 ± 2.2 vs 2.5 ± 2.2; P = .54) or adjunctive measures (14% vs 25%; P = .27). The groups were willing to tolerate the same mean pain (4.9 ± 2.5 vs 5.7 ± 2.4, P = .18) to avoid waiting for medication. The majority of women (85%) preferred to wait for an effective medication. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol for nulliparous women did not decrease pain or improve the ease of insertion of an IUD. Most women were willing to wait for a medication that decreases pain, indicating a need to pursue alternatives for pain control with IUD insertion.