RESUMO

Abstract Transgender is a broad-spectrum term referring to people who do not match their assigned sex at birth. Several issues, including social detachment, poor access to healthcare services, and the lack of social/economic opportunities, have historically affected this population. In this scenario, pharmacists - not mentioned in national and international clinical guidelines/protocols regarding transgender care - might be key professionals to serve and care for this population. The main goal of this literature review was to identify the pharmacists' role in the care of transgender people. The articles were retrieved from scientific databases. After applying filters (e.g., language, full-text availability, and coverage of the research question), seven articles were included in this review. The articles did not present pharmaceutical experiences or practices regarding transgender healthcare. Instead, some articles stressed the inadequate or inappropriate use of hormones and their side effects, also covering the role of this issue in professional development, gaps, and potential opportunities for research and pharmaceutical services. Pharmacists, included in a multi-professional team, could be a key element to promote access to healthcare and the well-being of the transgender population.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A Hipertensão Arterial Sistêmica (HAS) é uma condição clínica multifatorial, com tratamento não-farmacológico e/ou farmacológico, que necessita de acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico para gestão da condição de saúde. O objetivo foi avaliar o impacto de um programa de acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico em pacientes com HAS, através do estudo quase-experimental, longitudinal e prospectivo. Foram avaliados 28 pacientes, 50% estavam com pressão arterial descompensada, os PRM (Problemas Relacionados à Medicamentos) identificados foram interações medicamentosas (57,1%), duplicidade farmacoterapêutica (28,8%), medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos (38,5 %) e não adesão ao tratamento (89,3%). Dos RNM (Resultado Negativos associados à Medicação) 56,2% relacionavam-se à segurança e 37,5% à efetividade. Após o acompanhamento, 56,3% dos RNM foram resolvidos, 57,1% dos pacientes aderiram ao tratamento e houve redução da Pressão Arterial Sistólica (p=0,010) e Pressão Arterial Diastólica (p=0,020). O programa mostrou-se favorável na redução da pressão arterial sistêmica e resolução dos PRM e RNM.

Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH) is a multifactorial clinical condition with non-pharmacological and/or pharmacological treatment that requires pharmacotherapeutic monitoring in order to manage the health condition. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacotherapeutic follow-up program of patients with SAH through a quasi-experimental, longitudinal, and prospective study. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated, 50% of which had decompensated blood pressure; the DRPs identified were drug interactions (57.1%), pharmacotherapeutic duplication (28.8%), potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults (38.5%), and non-adherence to treatment (89.3%). Of the NOM identified (Negative Outcomes associated with Medication), 56.2% were related to safety, and 37.5% to effectiveness. After the follow-up, 56.3% of the NOM were resolved, 57.1% of patients adhered to treatment, and there was a reduction in the Systolic Blood Pressure (p = 0.010) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (p = 0.020). The program proved to be efficient in reducing systemic blood pressure and resolving DRPs and NOM.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to identify health outcomes related to medication regimen complexity as measured by the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) instrument. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Open Thesis, and Web of Science were searched from January 1, 2004, until April 02, 2018, using the following search terms: outcome assessment, drug therapy, and Medication Regimen Complexity Index and their synonyms in different combinations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies that used the MRCI instrument to measure medication regimen complexity and related it to clinical, humanistic, and/or economic outcomes were evaluated. Two reviewers independently carried out the analysis of the titles, abstracts, and complete texts according to the eligibility criteria, performed data extraction, and evaluated study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria; 18 health outcomes related to medication regimen complexity were found. The health outcomes most influenced by medication regimen complexity were hospital readmission, medication adherence, hospitalization, adverse drug events, and emergency sector visit. Only one study related medication regimen complexity with humanistic outcomes, and no study related medication regimen complexity to economic outcomes. Most of the studies were of good methodological quality. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Health care professionals should pay attention to medication regimen complexity of the patients because this may influence health outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study identified some health outcomes that may be influenced by medication regimen complexity: hospitalization, hospital readmission, and medication adherence were more prevalent, showing a significant association between MRCI increase and these health outcomes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is a reality in long-term care facilities. However, number of medications used by the patient should not be the only predictor of a complex pharmacotherapy. Although the level of complexity of pharmacotherapy is considered an important factor that may lead to side effects, there are few studies in this field. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complexity of pharmacotherapy in residents of three long-term care facilities. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the complexity of pharmacotherapy using the protocols laid out in the Medication Regimen Complexity Index instrument in three long-term care facilities in northeastern Brazil. As a secondary result, potential drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications, medication duplication, and polypharmacy were evaluated. After the assessment, the association among these variables and the Medication Regimen Complexity Index was performed. RESULTS: In this study, there was a higher prevalence of women (64.4%) with a high mean age among the study population of 81.8 (±9.7) years. The complexity of pharmacotherapy obtained a mean of 15.1 points (±9.8), with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 59. The highest levels of complexity were associated with dose frequency, with a mean of 5.5 (±3.6), followed by additional instructions of use averaging 4.9 (±3.7) and by the dosage forms averaging 4.6 (±3.0). CONCLUSIONS: The present study evaluated some factors that complicate the pharmacotherapy of geriatric patients. Although polypharmacy was implicated as a factor directly related to complexity, other indicators such as drug interactions, potentially inappropriate medications, and therapeutic duplication can also make the use of pharmacotherapy in such patients more difficult.

Assuntos