RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To validate externally the UTICalc, a popular clinical decision support tool used to determine the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in febrile children, and compare its performance with and without the inclusion of race and at differing risk thresholds. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, singlecenter case-control study of febrile children (2-24 months) in an emergency department. Cases with culture-confirmed UTI were matched 1:1 to controls. We compared the performance of the original model which included race (version 1.0) to a revised model which did not consider race (version 3.0). We evaluated model performance at risk thresholds between 2% and 5%. RESULTS: We included 185 cases and 197 controls (median age 8.4 months; IQR, 4.4-13.0 months; 60.5% girls). When using UTICalc version 1.0, the model area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) was 73.4% (95% CI 68.4%-78.5%), which was similar to the version 3.0 model (73.8%; 95% CI 68.7%-78.8%). When using a 2% risk threshold, the version 3.0 model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.7% and a specificity of 25.0%, with declines in sensitivity and gains in specificity at higher risk thresholds. Version 1.0 of the UTICalc had 12 false negatives, of whom 10 were Black (83%); whereas version 3.0 had 6 false negatives, of whom 2 were Black (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Versions of the UTICalc with and without race had similar performance to each other with a slight decline from the original derivation sample. The removal of race did not adversely affect the accuracy of the UTICalc.
Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias , Feminino , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções Urinárias/diagnósticoAssuntos
Cuidado da Criança/organização & administração , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Criança , Cuidado da Criança/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Intervenção Educacional Precoce/economia , Intervenção Educacional Precoce/organização & administração , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment for urinary tract infections in children could be individualized using biomarkers for acute pyelonephritis. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled 61 children with febrile urinary tract infections, collected blood and urine samples, and performed a renal scan within 2 weeks of diagnosis to identify those with pyelonephritis. Renal scans were interpreted centrally by 2 experts. We measured inflammatory proteins in blood and urine using LUMINEX or an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We evaluated serum RNA expression using RNA sequencing in a subset of children. Finally, for children with Escherichia coli isolated from urine cultures, we performed a polymerase chain reaction for 4 previously identified virulence genes. RESULTS: Urinary markers that best differentiated pyelonephritis from cystitis included chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)1, CXCL9, CXCL12, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, INF γ, and IL-15. Serum procalcitonin was the best serum marker for pyelonephritis. Genes in the interferon-γ pathway were upregulated in serum of children with pyelonephritis. The presence of E coli virulence genes did not correlate with pyelonephritis. CONCLUSIONS: Immune response to pyelonephritis and cystitis differs quantitatively and qualitatively; this may be useful in differentiating these 2 conditions.