RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of using a heated humidifier (HH), a heat and moisture exchanger (HME), or no warming device in maintaining body temperature during surgical procedures of 1 to 4 hours' duration. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Operating room, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. PATIENTS: 51 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, age 16 to 69 years, scheduled for a variety of lower abdominal procedures under general endotracheal anesthesia anticipated to last 1 to 4 hours. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned patients to receiving an HH, an HME, or no warming device during the procedure. We then measured the patient's sublingual temperature every 5 minutes prior to induction, every 15 minutes intraoperatively, and every 15 minutes postoperatively until he or she was discharged from the postanesthesia care unit, (PACU). We also measured the esophageal temperature every 15 minutes intraoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sublingual temperature or esophageal temperature probes placed at the site of maximal heart tones indicated that the patients' temperatures dropped significantly from baseline values in all three groups during the first 60 minutes of surgery, then remained constant during the next 120 minutes of surgery. Patients who had no warming device shivered and felt cold significantly more often than patients in the HH group but not more often than patients in the HME group. There was no difference in shivering between the HH and HME groups. The patients who received an HH tended to have a higher temperature (a mean of 0.5 degrees C) throughout the study, but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that these warming devices provide little benefit in preventing a temperature drop during procedures of 1 to 4 hours' duration, although patients with an HH tended to have a higher temperature than those with an HME or no device.
Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Anestesia por Inalação/instrumentação , Temperatura Corporal , Temperatura Alta/uso terapêutico , Umidade , Hipotermia/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Regulação da Temperatura Corporal , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Estremecimento , Termômetros , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the intubating conditions following the administration of pipecuronium bromide in doses of two (0.07 mg/kg) or three (0.1 mg/kg) times ED95 (average dose that gives 95% block of the first twitch). DESIGN: To compare intubating conditions at 11/2 and 21/2 minutes in 41 patients receiving balanced anesthesia. SETTING: Surgical patients at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-one patients undergoing surgical procedure who received general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After obtaining a stable baseline of train-of-four (TOF), 41 patients randomly received either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg of pipecuronium as a single intravenous (IV) bolus dose, and the trachea was intubated either at 11/2 or 21/2 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intubating conditions at 21/2 minutes appeared significantly better than those at 11/2 minutes, regardless of the pipecuronium dose. The mean time for T1 (first twitch of TOF) to reach 50% and 90% suppression was 1.36 +/- 0.51 minutes and 2.29 +/- 0.8 minutes, respectively, for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 1.07 +/- 0.27 minutes and 1.72 +/- 0.45 minutes, respectively, for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. This did not make a significant difference in intubating conditions at either time. The time to 25% recovery of T1 was 68.2 +/- 22 minutes for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 121.5 +/- 49 minutes for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. In patients who had spontaneous recovery of T1 to between 10% and 25% of control, administration of neostigmine or edrophonium resulted in identical recovery in 10 minutes. However, in patients with less than 10% spontaneous recovery of T1, neostigmine appeared to be superior to edrophonium. CONCLUSION: Pipecuronium has a relatively rapid onset. The trachea could be intubated successfully in 11/2 minutes with a dose of either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg. If the clinical situation requires perfect relaxation with no movement or bucking, we recommend waiting at least 21/2 minutes.
Assuntos
Androstano-3,17-diol/análogos & derivados , Intubação Intratraqueal , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Androstano-3,17-diol/administração & dosagem , Androstano-3,17-diol/antagonistas & inibidores , Androstano-3,17-diol/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Geral , Diafragma/efeitos dos fármacos , Edrofônio/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Contração Isométrica/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Neostigmina/farmacologia , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/administração & dosagem , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/antagonistas & inibidores , Bloqueadores Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Junção Neuromuscular/efeitos dos fármacos , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes/antagonistas & inibidores , Pipecurônio , Piperazinas/administração & dosagem , Piperazinas/antagonistas & inibidores , Transmissão Sináptica/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Prega Vocal/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a preprinted, risk-specific consent form on the amount of anesthetic risk information patients retain from the preoperative interview. DESIGN: Postoperative survey of consecutive inpatients to determine risk information retained before and after implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form, using standard preoperative risk discussions. SETTING: Inpatient units of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Two groups of patients, both of whom received a standard oral discussion of anesthetic risk information, were compared. Patients in the control group (125 consecutive inpatients) received this information only orally and were interviewed two weeks prior to implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form. Patients in the study group (92 consecutive inpatients) received this information orally and via a preprinted consent form and were interviewed between the fourth and sixth weeks after implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia residents discussed five standard anesthetic risks with elective, adult inpatients (n = 233) during a two-week period immediately before and between the fourth and sixth weeks after instituting the mandatory use of a risk-specific anesthesia consent form. These patients were interviewed postoperatively by one of the authors to determine the amount of anesthesia risk information they retained. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results of the postoperative survey showed that patients in the control group retained more information concerning anesthetic risks than did those in the study group (33% vs 19%, p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: To improve the informed consent process, either a better method of presenting the preprinted, risk-specific consent form or another method of simultaneously conveying and documenting risk information is needed.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Comunicação , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Anestesiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/estatística & dados numéricos , RiscoRESUMO
Postoperative hypertension can cause serious complications, including bleeding from fresh anastomoses, cardiovascular accident, and myocardial ischemia. Therefore rapid control of blood pressure is essential to prevent poor outcome. In this study, 30 American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II patients who did not have cardiac surgery and subsequently developed postoperative hypertension were randomly assigned to receive either nicardipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, or placebo. Intravenous nicardipine was given as a loading bolus of 10 mg/hr for 5 minutes and was titrated to 15 mg/hr if needed to achieve a therapeutic response. After therapeutic response, intravenous nicardipine was decreased to 3 mg/hr and subsequently titrated in increments of 1.0 to 2.5 mg/hr to maintain blood pressure control. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures during titration and maintenance did not differ significantly from preoperative levels in patients treated with nicardipine. The mean time to therapeutic response for the nicardipine-treated group was 8.67 +/- 1.46 minutes, and the median time to offset of action was 15 minutes. Eleven of the 12 patients who received placebo were crossed over to antihypertensive therapy, and of these, 10 received intravenous nicardipine. In this group all achieved therapeutic response in 7.3 +/- 1.18 minutes. The usefulness of intravenous nicardipine for postoperative hypertension was demonstrated in this study by: (1) the rapid control of blood pressure, (2) its continued efficacy during maintenance, and (3) little need to adjust dosage to control blood pressure.
Assuntos
Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Nicardipino/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Hipertensão/etiologia , Injeções Intravenosas , Nicardipino/administração & dosagem , Placebos , Distribuição Aleatória , Tempo de ReaçãoRESUMO
This paper examines the association between fertility and religious affiliation among Puerto Ricans. Bongaarts' proximate determinants framework is used to compare religious categories on behaviors that directly affect fertility. We found no difference in recent fertility between Catholics and non-Catholics in Puerto Rico (total fertility rate = 2.5). We also found Catholics and non-Catholics to be similar on age at first marriage (23.3 and 23.4 years, respectively), contraceptive use (71 percent and 69 percent of married women currently contracepting), and breast-feeding practices (mean duration of breast-feeding of 4.4 and 4.3 months). Differences were observed between less committed and more committed Catholics in total fertility rate, age at first marriage, and contraceptive use, but these differences were not large and were in the opposite direction from the expected. Our findings support the theory of convergence of Catholic and non-Catholic fertility for the US. Our discrepancy with findings from the National Survey of Family Growth is evidence of the cultural diversity in the US Hispanic population and indicates the importance of disaggregating by ethnicity or national origin when studying this population.