RESUMO

To develop and pilot-test a feasible and meaningful evaluation framework to support the ongoing improvement and performance measurement of services and systems in Latin America regarding Collaborative Mental health Care (CMHC). This mixed methods study, guided by a developmental evaluation approach, included: (1) a critical review of the literature; (2) an environmental scan at three selected health networks in Mexico, Nicaragua and Chile; (3) a Delphi group with experts; (4) a final consultation in the three sites; and (5) a pilot-test of the framework. A comprehensive evaluation framework was developed and successfully piloted. It considers five levels, 28 dimensions and 40 domains, as well as examples of indicators and an implementation plan. This evaluation framework represents an important effort to foster accountability and quality regarding CMHC in Latin America. Recommendations to build upon current capacity and to effectively address the existing implementation challenges are further discussed.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Approaches to collaborative mental health care (CMHC) have been implemented in many countries to strengthen the accessibility and delivery of mental health services in primary care. However, there are not well-defined frameworks to evaluate CMHC models. The purpose of this article is to identify, contextualize and discuss relevant health services research approaches, theory, and evaluation models for the development of an appropriate evaluation framework in order to foster effective CMHC in Latin America. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review informed a critical analysis of relevant theories and alternative methods to be considered in the development of the framework. RESULTS: Specific health services research frameworks are discussed in the context of evaluating CMHC. Two theoretical perspectives - collaboration theory and systems theory - and three evaluation models- realistic, developmental and collaborative - are analyzed in terms of their relevance. Methodological implications are identified. CONCLUSION: An appropriate evaluation framework for CMHC in Latin America needs to reflect theoretical and contextual considerations and relevant evaluation approaches and methods, including key dimensions and attributes/variables, core indicators, and recommendations for implementation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The progressive multimorbidity explosion has challenged Chile's health systems and worldwide. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a new Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in Chile. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the perspective of high-risk patients about the core elements of the model. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a cross sectional telephone-based survey that considered the application of a 13 items questionnaire. Of them, nine were Likert scale questions with scores from 1 to 7, one dichotomic question, and three open-ended questions. 231 high-risk patients who received care through the model at primary care centers participated in the study. Quantitative data were encoded, consolidated, and analyzed with the SPSS software. We performed descriptive and analytic statistics techniques to assess different variables and their potential associations. Thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative data. RESULTS: The overall score was 5.84 (range: 1 to 7), with a standard deviation of 1.25. Questions with the best scores were those related with personalized care and the primary care teams. The lowest scored was for the item regarding the continuity of care between primary nurses and inpatient care at the hospital. There was a difference in patient outcomes depending on their health center. Regarding sociodemographic characteristics, age did not significantly affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals the perceptions about a complex multimorbidity intervention from the patient's perspective. It complements the impact on health services utilization evaluation that supports decision-makers currently scaling up a similar strategy in our country and could be considered in other countries dealing with non-communicable diseases.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complex health interventions involve deep organizational, structural, and cultural changes that challenge health teams and decision-makers. The explosion of chronic diseases has made the multimorbidity approach a global priority. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC implemented a Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in the Chilean public health system. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the progress of the implementation of the Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model in seven primary care centers through key performance indicators. METHODS: a set of indicators was designed to evaluate change management, operations, installation of new roles, and services and activities of the intervention strategy of the model. Key performance indicators were identified to monitor the implementation progress on minimal components for the model's sustainability. Each item was assigned against an expected minimum score of 67% of progress from the overall score. They were monitored twice in seven primary health centers in 2019 and 2020, which intervened 22,642 patients with the intervention. RESULTS: The results showed that six of the seven primary care centers reached the minimum implementation threshold. The main advances were in operational conditions, and those with minor progress in implementation were the clinical services. Population size, organization, coordination of the health care teams, additional training, and decision-makers support were key factors that determined the degree of progress in a complex intervention. CONCLUSION: It was possible to measure the progression of the implementation of a complex intervention through key performance indicators delivering relevant information for decision-makers that pursue a successful and faithful implementation. This study provides a valuable tool for the national scale-up of a similar model started in Chile by the Ministry of Health and other countries.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers (PCPs) are relevant stakeholders for primary care research (PCR). OBJECTIVE: We report the perceived importance and interest in PCR of a national sample of Chilean PCPs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting Chilean PCPs. An electronic survey assessing perceived relevance of PCR, research training and experience, training interests, and demographics was disseminated through emails and WhatsApp messages. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted probabilities and 95% confidence intervals for high interest in PCR, high interest in using research methods, and high interest in receiving research training, and predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 387 providers completed the online survey. Only 26.4% of PCPs had research experience as a principal or co-investigator. However, most clinicians perceived PCR as very important (92.5%) and were interested in using research methods (90.7%) and receiving training (94.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in these perceptions between provider's discipline, role, sex, age, and geographical location after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite few Chilean PCPs have research training, a large majority perceive it as important, are interested in using it in their practice and would like to receive training.

RESUMO

Stigma toward people with mental illness and substance use problems is a significant global concern, and prevents people with these conditions from accessing treatment, particularly in primary health care (PHC) settings. Stigma is a cultural phenomenon that is influenced by particular contexts and can differ by country and region. The majority of stigma research focuses on Europe or North America leading to a lack of culturally relevant stigma research instruments for the Latin American context. The present study describes and discusses the methodology for cross-culturally adapting four stigma measurement scales to the Chilean context. The cross-cultural adaptation process included nine phases: (1) preparation; (2) independent translations; (3) synthesis 1 with expert committee; (4) focus groups and interviews with researchers, PHC professionals, and PHC users; (5) synthesis 2 with expert committee; (6) independent back translations; (7) synthesis 3 with expert committee; (8) pilot with PHC professionals; and (9) final revisions. The adaptation process included an array of diverse voices from the PHC context, and met three adaptation objectives defined prior to beginning the process (Understandability, Relevance, and Acceptability and Answer Options). The resulting, culturally adapted questionnaire is being validated and implemented within PHC settings across Chile to provide in-depth insight into stigma among PHC professionals in the country. The authors hope it will be useful for future research on mental illness and substance use stigma in similar settings across Latin America.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Multimorbidity Person-Centered Care Model allows to customize care according the needs of each person. AIM: To characterize the perception of health teams about the contribution of the Multimorbidity Person-Centered Care Model (MACEP) to the development of the key principles of the Comprehensive Family and Community Health Care Model (MAIS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A qualitative collaborative study with 35 interviews and the participation of 67 professionals from the primary healthcare network. Content analysis using mixed code system with MAXQDA2020 program. RESULTS: The innovations and complex interventions that positively affect the development and implementation of the essential principles of MAIS were recognized by participants as a contribution of the central elements of MACEP. CONCLUSIONS: This contribution is an opportunity for the expeditious implementation of Family Health principles in the health network. Incorporating the vision of implementers and users, who are part of these changes, is essential. It is necessary to establish, project and evaluate innovations to identify, implement and promote learning at Health Services throughout the country.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has abruptly changed care priority and delivery, delaying others like the multimorbidity approach. The Centro de Innovación en Salud ANCORA UC, the Health National Fund, and the Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur Oriente implemented a Multimorbidity Patient-Centered Care Model as a pilot study in the public health network from 2017 to 2020. Its objective was to reorganize the single diagnosis standard care into a new one based on multimorbidity integrated care. It included incorporating new roles, services, and activities according to each patient's risk stratification. This study aims to describe the perception of the health care teams regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on four main topics: how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the MCPM implementation, how participants adapted it, lessons learned, and recommendations for sustainability. We conducted a qualitative study with 35 semi-structured interviews between October and December 2020. Data analysis was codified, triangulated, and consolidated using MAXQDA 2020. Results showed that the pandemic paused the total of the implementation practically. Positive effects were the improvement of remote health care services, the activation of self-management, and the cohesion of the teamwork. In contrast, frequent abrupt changes and reorganization forced by pandemic evolution were negative effects. This study revealed the magnitude of the pandemic in the cancelation of health services and identified the urgent need to restart chronic services incorporating patient-centered care in our system.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Chile is implementing a Community Mental Health Model with a strong role of primary health care (PHC). PHC has great potential to early detection and provision of accessible and coordinated services to people who present mental illness and/or substance use issues (MISUI). However, stigma toward people with MISUI among PHC professionals is a significant barrier to accessing good quality of care. A wealth of literature supports the importance of reducing stigma for this population. The main goal of this research project is to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive anti-stigma intervention in reducing stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors among PHC providers toward individuals with MISUI in the Chilean context, using Centros de Salud Familiar (CESFAMs) as the point of intervention. Methods: The intervention is based on an initiative that was previously developed in Canada and then also pilot-tested in Lima, Peru, with the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (Ontario, Canada). The model will be culturally adapted with CESFAM PHC provider and user inputs to be relevant and valid to Chile. The 18-month intervention includes five (5) components that are simultaneously implemented in CESFAMs: (1) Develop a Team of Local Champions in each intervention CESFAM, comprising PHC providers and users; (2) Analysis of Internal CESFAM Policies, Procedures, and Protocols to determine areas of improvement in service delivery for individuals with MISUI; (3) Raising Awareness of stigma toward MISUI using various forms of media within the CESFAM; (4) Innovative Contact-Based Education workshops on anti-stigma and recovery principles, co-lead by academic/clinical trainers and a person with lived experience of MISUI; and (5) Recovery-Based Arts, a multi-week arts workshop for PHC providers and users to produce artwork related to MISUI and recovery, culminating in an exhibition to showcase artwork for the CESFAM providers, users, and community. The expected intervention outcomes are the following: Participation in the experimental group will result in a significant decrease in stigmatizing attitudes among PHC providers toward individuals with MISUI compared with the control group as measured by the Chilean version of the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers Scale (OMS-HC); Participation in the experimental group will result in a significant decrease of PHC users experiences of stigma conveyed by PHC providers compared with the control group as measured by the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale, validated for the Chilean population. The changes in attitudes and behaviors within the experimental group will be sustained over time as measured at 6 months-follow-up. To evaluate the effectiveness of this 18-month intervention, a 4-year, two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial is proposed, with CESFAMs being the unit of randomization (or "cluster"). Implementation Science approach will be taken to measure relevant implementation outcomes for each component of the intervention, and through qualitative data collection with CESFAM providers and authorities. Data analysis will be carried out using SAS 9.4 (specifically, using POC MIXED and PROC GENMOD) and R 3.5. Mixed-effect modeling will used for both PHC provider and user data, which will include individuals and CESFAMs as random effects and group (intervention/control) as fixed effects. Discussion: This study represents a new stage of relevant and innovative research in mental health and stigma in Chile that will contribute to improving access and quality of care for people with MISUI. Evaluating the impact of the intervention model and its implementation will provide the necessary tools to scale the intervention up to other CESFAMs across Chile. Clinical trial registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05578066].

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Multimorbidity Person-Centered Care Model allows to customize care according the needs of each person. AIM: To characterize the perception of health teams about the contribution of the Multimorbidity Person-Centered Care Model (MACEP) to the development of the key principles of the Comprehensive Family and Community Health Care Model (MAIS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A qualitative collaborative study with 35 interviews and the participation of 67 professionals from the primary healthcare network. Content analysis using mixed code system with MAXQDA2020 program. RESULTS: The innovations and complex interventions that positively affect the development and implementation of the essential principles of MAIS were recognized by participants as a contribution of the central elements of MACEP. CONCLUSIONS: This contribution is an opportunity for the expeditious implementation of Family Health principles in the health network. Incorporating the vision of implementers and users, who are part of these changes, is essential. It is necessary to establish, project and evaluate innovations to identify, implement and promote learning at Health Services throughout the country.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Present the methodology for comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of the Mental Health Global Action Programme (mhGAP) in Chile and describe the program's results. METHODS: Cross-sectional evaluative study based on a survey of key program informants deployed in 29 public health services in the country, as well as individual interviews and focus groups with key actors and experts. The evaluation was focused on the relevance and impact of mhGAP on the provision of mental health services and on the implementation of the program. RESULTS: The participants gave a positive evaluation of the progressive implementation of mhGAP in Chile. In particular: 1) They reported having better tools for detecting, diagnosing, and treating common disorders, and efficient referral strategies; (2) They rated all modules as important, the most relevant being self-harm/suicide (x¯ = 4.77) and mental and behavioral disorders in children and adolescents (x¯ = 4.58); (3) They favorably assessed the National Mental Health Day training courses and the subsequent courses repeated at the local level, indicating that these courses contributed to successful implementation of mhGAP; (4) They agreed on the need to incorporate new actors, strengthen certain aspects, and expand information on the program. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of mhGAP in Chile is an emblematic example of learning supported by the development of community mental health and family health, among other factors. These accomplishments offer a unique opportunity to continue advancing the implementation of this program in the country and to implement this experience in other contexts in Latin America and the Caribbean.

OBJETIVOS: Apresentar a metodologia de avaliação completa da implementação do Programa de ação mundial para reduzir as lacunas em saúde mental (Mental Health GAP, mhGAP) no Chile e descrever seus resultados. MÉTODOS: Estudo avaliativo transversal baseado em levantamento realizado com profissionais de referência do programa, distribuídos em 29 serviços de saúde da rede pública do país, e entrevistas individuais e grupos focais com as principais partes interessadas e especialistas. O enfoque da avaliação foi a relevância e o impacto do mhGAP na prestação de serviços de saúde mental e a implementação do programa. RESULTADOS: Os participantes do estudo avaliaram positivamente a implementação progressiva do mhGAP no Chile. Em particular, 1) eles afirmaram possuir recursos melhores para detecção, diagnóstico e tratamento de transtornos frequentes e estratégias de encaminhamento eficientes; 2) classificaram todos os módulos como importantes, com destaque a autoagressão/suicídio (x¯ = 4,77) e transtornos mentais e de comportamento em crianças e adolescentes (x¯ = 4,58); 3) avaliaram de forma favorável a realização das Jornadas Nacionais de Saúde Mental e suas iterações em nível local contribuindo ao sucesso da implementação do mhGAP e 4) concordaram com a necessidade de atrair mais interessados, reforçar alguns aspectos e ampliar a divulgação do programa. CONCLUSÕES: A implementação do mhGAP no Chile é um caso emblemático de aprendizado apoiado no avanço da saúde mental comunitária e saúde da família, entre outros fatores. Esta conquista cria uma oportunidade única para continuar a expandir a implementação do programa no país e disseminar esta experiência a outros contextos na América Latina e Caribe.

RESUMO

[RESUMEN]. Objetivos. Presentar la metodología de evaluación integral de la implementación del Programa de Acción Mundial para Superar las Brechas en Salud Mental (mhGAP) en Chile y exponer sus resultados. Métodos. Estudio evaluativo de corte transversal basado en una encuesta a referentes clave del programa, desplegados en los 29 servicios públicos de salud del país, y entrevistas individuales y grupos focales con actores clave y expertos. El foco de la evaluación estuvo en la relevancia e impacto del mhGAP en la prestación de servicios de salud mental y en la implementación del programa. Resultados. Los participantes evaluaron positivamente la implementación progresiva del mhGAP en Chile, en particular: 1) manifestaron contar con mejores herramientas de detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos frecuentes, y estrategias eficientes de derivación; 2) calificaron todos los módulos como importantes; los más relevantes fueron autolesión/suicidio (x¯ = 4,77) y trastornos mentales y conductuales del niño y el adolescente (x¯ = 4,58); 3) evaluaron favorablemente las Jornadas Nacionales y sus réplicas y su contribución al éxito de la implementación del mhGAP; 4) coincidieron en la necesidad de incorporar nuevos actores, fortalecer algunos aspectos y ampliar la información sobre el programa. Conclusiones. La implementación del mhGAP en Chile constituye un caso emblemático de aprendizaje, apoyado por el desarrollo de la salud mental comunitaria y la salud familiar, entre otros factores. Lo logrado abre una oportunidad única para continuar avanzando en la implementación de este programa en el país y transmitir esta experiencia a otros contextos de América Latina y el Caribe.

[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. Present the methodology for comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of the Mental Health Global Action Programme (mhGAP) in Chile and describe the program’s results. Methods. Cross-sectional evaluative study based on a survey of key program informants deployed in 29 public health services in the country, as well as individual interviews and focus groups with key actors and experts. The evaluation was focused on the relevance and impact of mhGAP on the provision of mental health services and on the implementation of the program. Results. The participants gave a positive evaluation of the progressive implementation of mhGAP in Chile. In particular: 1) They reported having better tools for detecting, diagnosing, and treating common disorders, and efficient referral strategies; (2) They rated all modules as important, the most relevant being self-harm/suicide (x¯ = 4.77) and mental and behavioral disorders in children and adolescents (x¯ = 4.58); (3) They favorably assessed the National Mental Health Day training courses and the subsequent courses repeated at the local level, indicating that these courses contributed to successful implementation of mhGAP; (4) They agreed on the need to incorporate new actors, strengthen certain aspects, and expand information on the program. Conclusions. The implementation of mhGAP in Chile is an emblematic example of learning supported by the development of community mental health and family health, among other factors. These accomplishments offer a unique opportunity to continue advancing the implementation of this program in the country and to implement this experience in other contexts in Latin America and the Caribbean.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Apresentar a metodologia de avaliação completa da implementação do Programa de ação mundial para reduzir as lacunas em saúde mental (Mental Health GAP, mhGAP) no Chile e descrever seus resultados. Métodos. Estudo avaliativo transversal baseado em levantamento realizado com profissionais de referência do programa, distribuídos em 29 serviços de saúde da rede pública do país, e entrevistas individuais e grupos focais com as principais partes interessadas e especialistas. O enfoque da avaliação foi a relevância e o impacto do mhGAP na prestação de serviços de saúde mental e a implementação do programa. Resultados. Os participantes do estudo avaliaram positivamente a implementação progressiva do mhGAP no Chile. Em particular, 1) eles afirmaram possuir recursos melhores para detecção, diagnóstico e tratamento de transtornos frequentes e estratégias de encaminhamento eficientes; 2) classificaram todos os módulos como importantes, com destaque a autoagressão/suicídio (x¯ = 4,77) e transtornos mentais e de comportamento em crianças e adolescentes (x¯ = 4,58); 3) avaliaram de forma favorável a realização das Jornadas Nacionais de Saúde Mental e suas iterações em nível local contribuindo ao sucesso da implementação do mhGAP e 4) concordaram com a necessidade de atrair mais interessados, reforçar alguns aspectos e ampliar a divulgação do programa. Conclusões. A implementação do mhGAP no Chile é um caso emblemático de aprendizado apoiado no avanço da saúde mental comunitária e saúde da família, entre outros fatores. Esta conquista cria uma oportunidade única para continuar a expandir a implementação do programa no país e disseminar esta experiência a outros contextos na América Latina e Caribe.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN Objetivos. Presentar la metodología de evaluación integral de la implementación del Programa de Acción Mundial para Superar las Brechas en Salud Mental (mhGAP) en Chile y exponer sus resultados. Métodos. Estudio evaluativo de corte transversal basado en una encuesta a referentes clave del programa, desplegados en los 29 servicios públicos de salud del país, y entrevistas individuales y grupos focales con actores clave y expertos. El foco de la evaluación estuvo en la relevancia e impacto del mhGAP en la prestación de servicios de salud mental y en la implementación del programa. Resultados. Los participantes evaluaron positivamente la implementación progresiva del mhGAP en Chile, en particular: 1) manifestaron contar con mejores herramientas de detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos frecuentes, y estrategias eficientes de derivación; 2) calificaron todos los módulos como importantes; los más relevantes fueron autolesión/suicidio (x¯ = 4,77) y trastornos mentales y conductuales del niño y el adolescente (x¯ = 4,58); 3) evaluaron favorablemente las Jornadas Nacionales y sus réplicas y su contribución al éxito de la implementación del mhGAP; 4) coincidieron en la necesidad de incorporar nuevos actores, fortalecer algunos aspectos y ampliar la información sobre el programa. Conclusiones. La implementación del mhGAP en Chile constituye un caso emblemático de aprendizaje, apoyado por el desarrollo de la salud mental comunitaria y la salud familiar, entre otros factores. Lo logrado abre una oportunidad única para continuar avanzando en la implementación de este programa en el país y transmitir esta experiencia a otros contextos de América Latina y el Caribe.

ABSTRACT Objectives. Present the methodology for comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of the Mental Health Global Action Programme (mhGAP) in Chile and describe the program's results. Methods. Cross-sectional evaluative study based on a survey of key program informants deployed in 29 public health services in the country, as well as individual interviews and focus groups with key actors and experts. The evaluation was focused on the relevance and impact of mhGAP on the provision of mental health services and on the implementation of the program. Results. The participants gave a positive evaluation of the progressive implementation of mhGAP in Chile. In particular: 1) They reported having better tools for detecting, diagnosing, and treating common disorders, and efficient referral strategies; (2) They rated all modules as important, the most relevant being self-harm/suicide (x¯ = 4.77) and mental and behavioral disorders in children and adolescents (x¯ = 4.58); (3) They favorably assessed the National Mental Health Day training courses and the subsequent courses repeated at the local level, indicating that these courses contributed to successful implementation of mhGAP; (4) They agreed on the need to incorporate new actors, strengthen certain aspects, and expand information on the program. Conclusions. The implementation of mhGAP in Chile is an emblematic example of learning supported by the development of community mental health and family health, among other factors. These accomplishments offer a unique opportunity to continue advancing the implementation of this program in the country and to implement this experience in other contexts in Latin America and the Caribbean.

RESUMO Objetivos. Apresentar a metodologia de avaliação completa da implementação do Programa de ação mundial para reduzir as lacunas em saúde mental (Mental Health GAP, mhGAP) no Chile e descrever seus resultados. Métodos. Estudo avaliativo transversal baseado em levantamento realizado com profissionais de referência do programa, distribuídos em 29 serviços de saúde da rede pública do país, e entrevistas individuais e grupos focais com as principais partes interessadas e especialistas. O enfoque da avaliação foi a relevância e o impacto do mhGAP na prestação de serviços de saúde mental e a implementação do programa. Resultados. Os participantes do estudo avaliaram positivamente a implementação progressiva do mhGAP no Chile. Em particular, 1) eles afirmaram possuir recursos melhores para detecção, diagnóstico e tratamento de transtornos frequentes e estratégias de encaminhamento eficientes; 2) classificaram todos os módulos como importantes, com destaque a autoagressão/suicídio (x¯ = 4,77) e transtornos mentais e de comportamento em crianças e adolescentes (x¯ = 4,58); 3) avaliaram de forma favorável a realização das Jornadas Nacionais de Saúde Mental e suas iterações em nível local contribuindo ao sucesso da implementação do mhGAP e 4) concordaram com a necessidade de atrair mais interessados, reforçar alguns aspectos e ampliar a divulgação do programa. Conclusões. A implementação do mhGAP no Chile é um caso emblemático de aprendizado apoiado no avanço da saúde mental comunitária e saúde da família, entre outros fatores. Esta conquista cria uma oportunidade única para continuar a expandir a implementação do programa no país e disseminar esta experiência a outros contextos na América Latina e Caribe.

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Mental disorders represent one of the main causes of disease burden in the adult population. Negative public attitudes and behaviors toward people with mental disorders negatively affect the treatment, recovery, and social inclusion of those affected. Chile laks surveys on workers that address this issue. Objective To describe the perceptions of devaluation and discrimination towards people with mental disorders in a sample of Chilean workers. Method A cross-sectional study was carried out with 1 516 workers in the formal sector of four regions of Chile (Metropolitan Region [RM], Bío Bio [VIII], Valparaíso [V] and Coquimbo [IV]). The perception of discrimination and devaluation was explored through a modified version of the The perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale (PDD) comprising 15 questions. The relationship of each question with sociodemographic variables (age, sex, years of study, and region) and type of economic activity was assessed. Results The study found a high percentage of perceptions of devaluation and discrimination in most aspects considered, particularly those related to hiring a person who has been hospitalized due to a mental illness (85%), feeling sorry for people with severe mental illnesses (80%), and the unwillingness to marry a person with a mental illness (78%). Significant differences were observed in the opinions by sociodemographic variables and region of residence. Discussion and conclusion The perception of Chilean workers has high levels of stigma towards people living with mental disorders. It is necessary and urgent to develop effective anti-stigma public policies to promote a more inclusive, tolerant society.

Resumen Introducción Los trastornos mentales representan una de las principales causas de carga de morbilidad en la población adulta. Las actitudes y conductas públicas negativas hacia las personas con trastornos mentales inciden negativamente en el tratamiento, la recuperación e inclusión social de las personas afectadas. Chile no cuenta con encuestas en trabajadores que aborden este tema. Objetivo Describir las percepciones de devaluación y discriminación hacia personas con trastornos mentales en una muestra de trabajadores chilenos. Método Se realizó un estudio transversal con 1 516 trabajadores del sector formal de cuatro regiones de Chile (Región Metropolitana [RM], de Bío Bio [VIII], de Valparaíso [V] y de Coquimbo [IV]). Se exploró la percepción de discriminación y devaluación por medio de una versión modificada de la Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale (PDD) con 15 preguntas. Se analizó la relación de cada pregunta con variables sociodemográficas (edad, sexo, años de estudio y región) y tipo de actividad económica. Resultados Se detectó un alto porcentaje de percepción de devaluación y discriminación en la mayoría de los aspectos considerados, destacándose los relacionados con la contratación de una persona que ha sido hospitalizada por una enfermedad mental (85%), sentir pena por las personas con enfermedades mentales graves (80%) y el rechazo a casarse con una persona que tenga una enfermedad mental (78%). Se observaron diferencias significativas en las percepciones, según las variables sociodemográficas y las relativas a la región de residencia. Discusión y conclusión La percepción de los trabajadores en Chile muestra altos niveles de estigma social hacia personas con trastornos mentales. Es necesario y urgente desarrollar políticas públicas antiestigma efectivas, promoviendo al mismo tiempo una sociedad más inclusiva y tolerante.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stigma toward people with mental health problems (MHP) in primary health care (PHC) settings is an important public health challenge. Research on stigma toward MHP is relatively scarce in Chile and Latin America, as are instruments to measure stigma that are validated for use there. The present study aims to validate the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Professionals (OMS-HC) among staff and providers in public Chilean PHC clinics, and examine differences in stigma by sociodemographic characteristics. METHODS: 803 participants from 34 PHC clinics answered a self-administered questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis was completed. Average 15-item OMS-HC scores were calculated, and means were compared via t-test or ANOVA to identify group differences. Correlations of OMS-HC scores with other commonly used stigma scores were calculated to evaluate construct validity. RESULTS: The 3-factor OMS-HC structure was confirmed in this population. The average OMS-HC (α = 0.69) score was 34.55 (theoretical range 15-75). Significantly lower (less stigmatizing) mean OMS-HC scores were found in those with additional training and/or personal experience with MHP. CONCLUSION: The validated, Spanish version of OMS-HC can be of use to further research stigma toward MHP in Chile and Latin America, advancing awareness and inspiring interventions to reduce stigma in the future.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: A high level of social support (SS) is associated with better health outcomes in many conditions, such as chronic diseases. Aim : To describe the level of SS in patients with Hypertension and type II Diabetes at Primary Health Care level in Chile and its association with self-rated health, adherence to treatment and better glycemic and blood pressure control. Material and Methods : SS was measured using a social support inventory previously validated in Chile. Self-Rated Health was assessed with a single non-comparative general question; adherence to medication was assessed using the four-item Morisky medication adherence scale. Blood glucose and blood pressure control were also assessed. A logistic regression was performed to estimate Prevalence Odds Ratio (POR) and Robust Poisson method to estimate the Prevalence Ratio (PR). Results : Eighty three percent of the 647 participants evaluated high for SS. There was a significant correlation between SS and Self-rated health (POR 2.32; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.19-11.23; PR 1.18; 95% CI 1.07-1.31). No statistically significant association was observed with medication adherence, glycemic or blood pressure control. Conclusions: High levels of SS were found. The association between self-rated health suggests that SS interventions targeting vulnerable subgroups would be worthwhile.

Assuntos