RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the adenovirus serotype in Mexican patients with folicular conjunctivitis and keratoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Adenovirus-specific PCR was used to analyze sample scrapings from the inferior fornix of patients with follicular conjunctivitis and clinical suspicion of adenovirus from January 2005 to December 2006. Identification of the serotype was made by automated sequencing. The nucleotide sequences obtained were compared with the reported sequences in GenBank. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed on the results. RESULTS: Of the 77 samples with clinical data of follicular conjunctivitis that were analyzed, 43 (56%) presented adenovirus. The sequencing of each positive sample allowed the identification of Ad1, Ad2, Ad3 and Ad8; the sequences of the serotype were identical those reported in GenBank with accession numbers: AF 534906 and AY 224420 for a sequence of the gene coding for the filament of Ad1 and Ad2 respectively, and AY 854180 and DQ 149614 for a sequence of the gene that codes for the Hexon protein of Ad3 and Ad8 respectively. From the statistical analysis it was possible to determine that a preferential seasonality of the serotype does not exist. CONCLUSION: In this work the Ad1, Ad2 and Ad3 serotypes were identified in patients with clinical diagnosis of follicular conjunctivitis in 2005. Ad2 was the predominant serotype. Ad8 was also detected in an outbreak of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. From an epidemiological point of view, no serotype found seems to have a preferred seasonality.
Assuntos
Adenoviridae/genética , Conjuntivite/virologia , Ceratoconjuntivite/virologia , Adenoviridae/classificação , Adenoviridae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , México , SorotipagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical data and the results of molecular analyses of the TGFBI gene in a patient with classic granular stromal corneal dystrophy (type I). METHODS: A female patient aged 60-years complaining of a long-standing decrease of visual acuity bilaterally associated with photophobia and foreign body sensation, underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination. Molecular analyses of DNA from the patient and from an affected brother included PCR amplification of exons 4, 11, 12, and 14 of the TGFBI gene and direct automated sequencing of the PCR products. RESULTS: The affected patient showed a pattern of corneal stromal lesions that was compatible with a diagnosis of classic granular dystrophy. No involvement of other corneal layers was evident. Molecular analysis disclosed a point mutation in exon 14 of the TGFBI gene which consisted of an adenine to guanine change at nucleotide position 1924, predicting a substitution of arginine instead of histidine at residue 626 of the TGFBI protein (H626R). An identical mutation was detected in DNA from her affected brother. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that a case of stromal granular dystrophy has been demonstrated to be caused by the H626R mutation, a molecular defect classically detected in the phenotypically distinct lattice corneal dystrophy. Our data indicate that the same molecular defects in the TGFBI gene lead to different phenotypes in stromal dystrophies, thus expanding the genotypic-phenotypic spectrum in this group of corneal diseases.