RESUMO
This study analyses education actions and their strategies for preventing and controlling dengue fever, highlighting constraints and difficulties. Conducted through a qualitative approach at the Primary Care Unit and 8 properties in Icaraí, Ceará State, Brazil, its 17 subjects are divided into groups: I (8 PCU users); II (4 Endemic Disease Control Agents); and III (5 healthcare practitioners). The data was collected through semi-structured interviews; participative observation and documentary analyses, using a hermeneutic dialectic analysis method. The findings indicate that health education actions are divergent, while transforming actions are ineffective in terms of impacts on the disease. Difficulties include: weak location-specific actions; educational messages whose contents are not tailored to their contexts; authoritarian and coercive strategies; absence of public policies; gaps between PCU and local population; stress on public health campaigns; practitioners who do not listen to the population and vice-versa; with technical expertise still prevailing over users. The evidence underscores the need for actions strengthening the possibilities of empowering the subjects, helping them become responsible for their own lives and citizenship construction processes.
Assuntos
Dengue/prevenção & controle , Educação em Saúde , Brasil , HumanosRESUMO
O estudo analisa as ações educativas para prevenção e controle da dengue, as estratégias utilizadas nas ações educativas e aponta os limites/dificuldades. Abordagem qualitativa, desenvolvida na Unidade Básica de Saúde e oito imóveis em Icaraí-CE. Os sujeitos foram dezessete pessoas, distribuídas entre três grupos: I (oito usuários da UBS); II (quatro Agentes de Controle de Endemias); III (cinco profissionais de Saúde). As técnicas de coleta de dados: a entrevista semi-estruturada; a observação participante, a análise de documental. O método de análise foi hermenêutica dialética. Pode-se afirmar que as práticas educativas em saúde são divergentes, a ação transformadora é ineficaz para impactar a doença. Apontaram-se como dificuldades as fragilidade e ações pontuais; conteúdo das mensagens educativas descontextualizadas; estratégias autoritárias e coercitivas, ausência de políticas públicas, limites entre a UBS e a população; ênfase às campanhas sanitárias; os profissionais não ouvem a população e vice-versa; ainda predomina o saber técnico sobre o usuário. Evidencia a necessidade de ações que fortaleçam a possibilidade dos sujeitos terem o poder e a responsabilidade pela própria história e pelo processo de construção de sua cidadania.
This study analyses education actions and their strategies for preventing and controlling dengue fever, highlighting constraints and difficulties. Conducted through a qualitative approach at the Primary Care Unit and 8 properties in Icaraí, Ceará State, Brazil, its 17 subjects are divided into groups: I (8 PCU users); II (4 Endemic Disease Control Agents); and III (5 healthcare practitioners). The data was collected through semi-structured interviews; participative observation and documentary analyses, using a hermeneutic dialectic analysis method. The findings indicate that health education actions are divergent, while transforming actions are ineffective in terms of impacts on the disease. Difficulties include: weak location-specific actions; educational messages whose contents are not tailored to their contexts; authoritarian and coercive strategies; absence of public policies; gaps between PCU and local population; stress on public health campaigns; practitioners who do not listen to the population and vice-versa; with technical expertise still prevailing over users. The evidence underscores the need for actions strengthening the possibilities of empowering the subjects, helping them become responsible for their own lives and citizenship construction processes.