RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in adhesive capsulitis (AC) and determine the most valuable MRI finding in diagnosis using easily applied quantitative methods. METHODS: Shoulder MRI was performed on 193 patients who were diagnosed with AC by clinical examination and 116 controls. Axillary pouch thickness (APT), superior and inferior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL and IGHL) thickness, coracohumeral ligament (CHL) thickness, fluid increase and soft-tissue thickness in the rotator interval (RI), and increases in the fluid and signal in the localization of biceps tendon attachment were evaluated. MRI examinations were assessed by three radiologists blinded to the clinical findings of the patients, and the results were obtained based on consensus and records. RESULTS: There were 119 women and 74 men in the AC group and 80 women and 36 men in the control group. IGHL, SGHL, RI, and CHL thicknesses were measured thicker in AC patients than in the control group. When IGHL=4, RI=3.6, SGHL=2.0, CHL=4.6-mm cutoff, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values were 0.700, 0.922, 0.972, and 0.783, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results obtained in this study, IGHL=4 mm, RI=3.6 mm, SGHL=2.0 mm, and CHL=4.6 mm can support the diagnosis of AC. Using the quantitative values in diagnosis can provide objective criteria and prevent variability among interpreters.
Assuntos
Bursite , Articulação do Ombro , Axila , Bursite/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Ligamentos Articulares , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate and compare the ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of incidentally detected hyperechoic focal liver lesions. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (29 males and 45 females) who had undergone a B-mode ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging examination were included in this study. A total of 91 hyperechoic lesions detected on ultrasonography were evaluated. The ultrasonography features of these hyperechoic lesions were recorded, and the results were compared with those acquired from contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The results were compared statistically using the Shapiro-Wilk, McNemar, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: A corresponding lesion was found on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in 72 of the 91 (79.1%) hyperechoic lesions detected on ultrasonography. Forty-one (56.9%) of the magnetic resonance imaging-defined lesions were typical hemangiomas, while 10 (13.9%) were focal steatosis areas and 4 (5.6%) were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, 6 lesions (8.3%) were diagnosed as simple hepatic cysts, 4 (5.6%) as sclerosing hemangioma, 2 (2.8%) as thrombosed hemangioma, 1 (1.4%) as focal nodular hyperplasia, 1 (1.4%) as hamartoma, 2 (2.8%) as hydatid cysts, and 1 (1.4%) as hepatic lipoma. No statistically significant differences were found between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of the segmental classification of the true positive lesions based on contour structures and lesion area measurements (p=0.558, p=0.375, and p=0.636, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Incidentally detected hyperechoic zones may not necessarily be detected on magnetic resonance imaging. This may be secondary to focal hepatic steatosis or false interpretation of the radiologist. Lesions requiring therapy must be considered in the differential diagnosis.