RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is considered a treatment option for steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses. Our objective was to assess long-term clinical response to TPE in MS steroid-refractory exacerbations. METHODS: Retrospective study of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients presenting intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMPS)-refractory relapses, who underwent TPE. Response to TPE was assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24-months post-treatment, and compared to a second group of RRMS patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics presenting, IVMPS-refractory relapses but not treated with TPE. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess potential predictors of significant clinical response. RESULTS: Between 2011 to 2020, a total of 23 RRMS patients were treated with TPE. Twenty-one patients not receiving the treatment served as controls. No differences in demographic or clinical characteristics, or predictors of clinical improvement after TPE were detected between groups. Seventy-eight percent of patients treated with TPE presented clinical improvement at 24 months. TPE-treated patients presented lower EDSS scores at 6 and at 24 months. Younger age, presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and TPE treatment were associated with better clinical outcomes. No life-threatening side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: TPE is a safe and well tolerated procedure that decreases long-term disability in RRMS patients with IVMPS-refractory relapses.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Troca Plasmática , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 2015 International Panel for neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders (NMOSD) diagnosis (IPND) criteria was recently proposed. However, because there are no studies evaluating application of the IPND criteria in Latin American populations, we aimed to assess whether these new criteria improve the diagnostic rate and reduce the time taken to make the diagnosis in a cohort of Latin American patients. METHODS: We reviewed medical records and applied both the 2006 and 2015 diagnostic criteria to all patients seen in four centers in Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS, n = 915) or other well-established central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory diseases were excluded. AQP4-ab status was measured using indirect immunofluorescence (23%) and cell-based assay (CBA, 77%). In addition, data on gender, ethnicity, age and symptoms at onset, relapses, neuroimaging and immunosuppressive therapy were collected. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were classified as presenting NMOSD (2015 IPND). Of these, 64 patients (61.5%) fulfilled the 2006 NMO criteria (32 AQP4-ab positive, 17 AQP4-ab negative and 15 unknown). Thus, 40 new patients (38.5%) were classified as presenting NMOSD using the 2015 IPND criteria (33 AQP4-ab positive, 5 AQP4-ab negative and 2 unknown AQP4-ab status), with a median time taken to fulfill the 2015 NMOSD criteria (n = 104) of 1 month (95% CI: 0.6-1.3) and a median time taken to fulfill the 2006 NMO criteria (n = 64) of 18 months (95% CI: 9-26) (log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Females, with median age of 37 years, white ethnicity and recurrent course, predominated in all samples. Ninety-nine patients (95.1%) had at least 1 of the 3 major core clinical characteristics, of which optic neuritis (56.7%) was the most frequent symptom at disease onset. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there was a 62.5% increase in the rate of diagnosing NMOSD through the 2015 IPND criteria, in comparison with the 2006 NMO criteria, with a shorter median time to diagnosis.