RESUMO
Introduction: This report aimed to compare ventral extended vision extraperitoneal (ETEP) and preaponeurotic repair (REPA) techniques in terms of surgical procedure, outcomes, and patient evolution. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed at a tertiary care academic center between 2017 and 2022. All consecutive patients operated on for midline hernias and rectus diastasis using REPA and ETEP were included. Follow-up visits were at 15 days, 30 days, and 6 months postoperative. Age, sex, BMI, American Surgical Anesthesiologic Classification (ASA), surgical time, need for conversion to open surgery, time of stay, seroma, hematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), recurrence, and re-interventions were assessed. Results: For the present study, 148 patients were included. From them, 62 patients received the REPA procedure and 86 were operated on using the ETEP technique. REPA average time was 105 minutes (interquartile range [IR] 80-130), and ETEP average time was 120 minutes (RIC 95-285) (p = 0.03). Ambulatory procedures were 32.3% (n = 20) REPA and 20.9% (n = 18) ETEP (p = 0.23). In REPA, the mean time for drain extraction was 11.92 days and 8 days in ETEP (p < 0.001). Seroma incidence was identified in 40.3% (n = 25) of the REPA cases and 5.8% (n = 5) of the ETEP procedures (p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis for seroma incidence REPA technique was associated with a significant risk of its incidence [odds ratio (OR) 16, 67 95% confidence interval ((CI95) 4.67-59.52), p < 0.001]. Conclusion: REPA and ETEP are safe and reproducible. Both approaches reported short hospitalization times and almost no major complications. We found a longer surgical time in ETEP and a higher incidence of seroma in REPA.
Assuntos
Herniorrafia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Evaluar la reproducibilidad y la seguridad de un programa de cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica en dos centros de Sudamérica. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio analítico-descriptivo. Se revisaron retrospectivamente los registros clínicos de pacientes sometidos a cirugía videolaparoscópica colorrectal desde el año 2012 hasta el año 2018, en dos centros académicos de tercer nivel argentinos. Se analizaron datos demográficos, indicaciones y tiempos quirúrgicos, tasa de conversión, evolución posoperatoria, morbimortalidad y resecabilidad oncológica, y se comparó con el abordaje convencional. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 505 cirugías. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 63.4 años y el 50.9% eran hombres. El tiempo operatorio medio fue de 175 minutos. La principal indicación fue cáncer de colon. La incidencia de conversión fue del 9.5%. El promedio de ganglios por pieza quirúrgica en patología neoplásica fue de 15.9. La morbilidad fue del 35.4%, en su mayoría complicaciones menores. La tasa de fístulas fue del 11.7%. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 2.5%. CONCLUSIÓN: La cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica podría representar una opción segura y reproducible en un centro de tercer nivel de un país en desarrollo. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safeness of a colorectal laparoscopic program in two centers form South America. METHOD: We retrospectively review the records of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery from 2012 to 2018 in two tertiary care academic centers. Surgical indication, operative time, conversion rate, lymph nodes harvested, surgical margins and complications were analyzed. This results were then compared to the open approach. RESULTS: We collected data from 505 patients, mean age 63.4, 50.9% male. The most frequent indication was colon cancer, mean operative time was 175 minutes. Conversion rate was 9.5%, mean nodes harvested was 15.9 with free resection margins in every case. Morbidity was 35.4% at 30 days, most of them were minor complications. The leak rate was 11.7 %. The 30-day mortality was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach for colorectal surgery might represent a safe and feasible option in an tertiary care hospital from a developing country.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Atenção Terciária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) presents similar short-term results and oncological outcomes to conventional colectomy (CC) in colon cancer. OBJECTIVES: Compare short-term and oncological outcomes at 3-year follow up between LC and CC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LC and CC for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Short-term results and oncological outcomes were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-nine patients were included in the study. CC was performed in 37.5% and LC in 62.5%. LC presented shorter operative time (157 vs. 175 min, p = 0.01), shorter length of stay (8.4 vs. 10.5 days, p = 0.02), lees readmission (6% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and lower morbidity (40% vs. 56%, p = 0.01). No differences were found for overall survival (OAS) (LC = 87.1% vs. CC = 82.8%, p = 0.28) and disease-free survival (DFS) (LC = 78.2% vs. CC = 75.3%, p = 0.47). Recurrence was observed in 37 patients (LC = 16.1% vs. CC = 18.3%, p = 0.53). No differences were found for local recurrence (LC = 6.5% vs. CC = 8.6%, p = 0.49) and distant recurrence (LC = 12.1% vs. CC = 16.1%, p = 0.3). Stage analysis showed no difference for recurrence, OAS, and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: LC is a safe procedure with short-term outcomes, OAS, DFS, and recurrence similar to CC. LC should be the initial indication in non-metastatic colon cancer in our population.
ANTECEDENTES: La colectomía laparoscópica (CL) presenta resultados a corto plazo y oncológicos similares a los de la colectomía convencional (CC) en cáncer de colon. OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados a corto plazo y oncológicos a 3 años de seguimiento entre la CL y la CC. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Pacientes intervenidos de CL y CC por cáncer de colon entre enero de 2010 y diciembre de 2017. Se estudiaron los resultados a corto plazo y oncológicos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 269 pacientes (62.5% CL y 37.5% CC). La CL presentó menor tiempo quirúrgico (157 vs. 175 min; p = 0.01), menor estadía hospitalaria (8.4 vs. 10.5 días; p = 0.02), menor reinternación (6% vs. 15%; p = 0.02) y menor morbilidad (40 vs. 56%; p = 0.01). No se observan diferencias para sobrevida global (87.1% CL y 82.8% CC; p = 0.28) y sobrevida libre de enfermedad (78.2% CL y 75.3% CC; p = 0.47). Hubo recidiva en 37 pacientes (16.1% CL y 18.3% CC; p = 0.53). No se encontraron diferencias en recidiva local (6.5% CL y 8.6% CC; p = 0.49), a distancia (12.1% CL y 16.1% CC; p = 0.3), al dividir la recidiva, la sobrevida global y la sobrevida libre de enfermedad por estadios. CONCLUSIONES: La CL es un procedimiento seguro, con una sobrevida global, una sobrevida libre de enfermedad y una tasa de recidiva similares a las de la CC. La CL debería ser la indicación inicial en el cáncer de colon no metastásico en nuestra población.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Accelerated recovery protocols in colorectal surgery have enhanced the perioperative cares optimizing recovery in this group of patients. A reduction in surgical stress and therefore early hospital discharge and lower morbidity is pursued, however, the literature offers few outcomes regarding its application in developing countries. Objective: to analyze short- and medium-term outcomes of the application of an accelerated recovery protocol in a terciary care hospital in Argentina. Methods: In the period between January 2015 and March 2017 patients were included prospectively and consecutively with indication of elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery and under strict follow-up according to the protocol created by the institution. Patients older than 80 years, ASA IV, emergency surgeries and conventional approach were excluded. We analyzed demographic data, diagnosis of surgery, type of intervention, hospital stay, complications, readmissions and reinterventions at 30 postoperative days. Results: Sixty-four patients with a mean age of 62 years were included. The mean hospitalization was 4.9 days, with 10.9% readmissions and 4.7% of reinterventions. We recorded 69% of the patients whit not complications at all and 5 major complications (8%) . Conclusion: Based on the adaptation of the international guidelines to our health reality, it is feasible to create an accelerated recovery protocol applicable in our country, with a low complication rate and early discharge.
Introducción: El desarrollo de los protocolos de recuperación acelerada en cirugía colorrectal ha revalorizado los cuidados que conforman la recuperación perioperatoria de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía. Se persigue una reducción del stress quirúrgico y por tanto alta precoz y menor morbilidad, sin embargo, la literatura aporta pocos resultados respecto a su aplicación en países en desarrollo. Objetivo: analizar los resultados a corto y mediano plazo de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada en un hospital de alta complejidad de nuestro medio. En el periodo comprendido entre enero 2015 y marzo 2017 se incluyeron pacientes de manera prospectiva y consecutiva con indicación deAñadir colaborador/a cirugía colorrectal laparocopica electiva y bajo estricto seguimiento según protocolo creado por la institución. Fueron excluidos pacientes mayores de 80 años, ASA IV, cirugías de urgencia y abordaje convencional. Se analizaron datos demográficos indicación de cirugía, tipo de intervención, estadía hospitalaria en días, complicaciones, readmisiones y reintervenciones a los 30 días de postoperatorio. Resultados: Fueron incluidos 64 pacientes con una edad media de 62 años. El promedio de internación en días fue de 4,9, con 10,9% de reinternaciones y 4,7% de reintervenciones. El 69% de los pacientes no presento complicaciones, registrándose 5 complicaciones mayores (8%). Conclusión: A partir de la adecuación de los lineamientos internacionales a nuestra realidad sanitaria, es factible la creación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada aplicable en nuestro medio, con baja tasa de complicaciones y alta precoz.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Perioperatória , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common nosocomial infection in surgical patients with an incidence that varies between 5-30%. OBJECTIVE: Identify the risk factors for SSI in colonic surgery in our population. The secondary aims are to determine the incidence and type of SSI, as well as the incidence of an anastomotic leakage (AL). METHODS: Case-control study of patients undergoing colectomy between 2010-2014 at the Hospital Privado Univeristario de Córdoba and Hospital Raúl Ferreyra. Conventional and laparoscopic interventions, with a 30-day postoperative follow up, between 20-85 years and an ASA I-III were included. Patients undergoing emergency surgery and recto-anal resections were excluded. SSI was defined as an infection that occurred within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: We included 238 patients. SSI was diagnosed in 27.7% (n=66) of the patients of which 12.2% were superficial, 4.6% deep incisional and 10.9% organ/space. Multivariate analysis showed that SSI was independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; IC95%:1.43-6.92; p=0.004), having undergone previous chemotherapy (OR 6.72; IC95%:1.48-30.93; p=0.01), need for conversion (OR 3.32; IC95%:1.13-9.77; p=0.02), reintervention within the 30 postoperative days (OR 12.34; IC95%:2.65-57.37, p=0.001) and AL (OR 12.83; IC95%:2.97- 55.5; p=0.001). AL had an incidence of 9.6%, of which 91% presented SSI and all were organ/space. CONCLUSION: We found that male sex, having undergone previous chemotherapy, conversion, reintervention within 30 postoperative days and AL are risk factors for SSI in our population. These results should be considered in implementing preventive measures for SSI.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colo/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Argentina/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, many studies have addressed the laparoscopic management of these tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic atypical gastrectomy in the resolution of these neoplasms. In the period between January 2009 and December 2015, 24 patients with suspected gastric GIST less than 5 cm in size underwent surgery under this approach. Abscense of peritoneal and liver metastases and immunohistochemistry expression of CD117 antigen were considered as inclusion criteria. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and histopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications and oncological results. Statistical analysis included 14 patients. The mean age was 60 years (10 women and 4 men) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding was the chief complaint for consultation. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one case and no major complications, readmissions or reoperations were recorded. The mean tumor size was 41 mm with negative resection margin in all samples. The mean hospital stay was 3 days and no tumor recurrences were recorded in 44 months of follow-up. Laparoscopic atypical gastrectomy for gastric GIST is a safe and effective technique with good outcomes in experienced hands.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Los tumores gastrointestinales del estroma son las neoplasias mesenquimatosas más frecuentes del tracto gastrointestinal. Numerosas investigaciones se han dirigido al tratamiento laparoscópico de los mismos. El propósito de este estudio es evaluar la seguridad y la eficacia de las gastrectomías atípicas en un hospital de alta complejidad de nuestro medio. En el período comprendido entre enero 2009 y diciembre 2015, 24 pacientes con sospecha de GIST gástrico fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente vía laparoscópica, considerándose criterio de inclusión la ausencia de metástasis hepáticas y peritoneales a distancia, el tamaño tumoral < 5 cm de diámetro y la positividad del antígeno CD117 en los estudios inmunohistoquímicos. Se analizaron retrospectivamente las características clínico-patológicas, los resultados quirúrgicos, las complicaciones postoperatorias y los resultados oncológicos. Fueron incluidos en el estudio estadístico 14 pacientes. La edad promedio fue 60 años (10 mujeres y 4 hombres) y la hemorragia digestiva alta fue la sintomatología de diagnóstico más frecuente. El tiempo promedio de cirugía fue 113 minutos, con necesidad de conversión en un caso. No se registraron complicaciones mayores, reintervenciones ni reinternaciones. El tamaño tumoral promedio fue 41 mm, con márgenes quirúrgicos libres de enfermedad. El promedio de internación fue 3 días y el de seguimiento 44 meses, sin registro de recidivas tumorales. El abordaje laparoscópico a través de gastrectomías atípicas del GIST gástrico resultó una técnica segura y eficaz con buenos resultados a corto y mediano plazo en manos de cirujanos con experiencia.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, many studies have addressed the laparoscopic management of these tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic atypical gastrectomy in the resolution of these neoplasms. In the period between January 2009 and December 2015, 24 patients with suspected gastric GIST less than 5 cm in size underwent surgery under this approach. Abscense of peritoneal and liver metastases and immunohistochemistry expression of CD117 antigen were considered as inclusion criteria. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and histopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications and oncological results. Statistical analysis included 14 patients. The mean age was 60 years (10 women and 4 men) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding was the chief complaint for consultation. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in one case and no major complications, readmissions or reoperations were recorded. The mean tumor size was 41 mm with negative resection margin in all samples. The mean hospital stay was 3 days and no tumor recurrences were recorded in 44 months of follow-up. Laparoscopic atypical gastrectomy for gastric GIST is a safe and effective technique with good outcomes in experienced hands.