RESUMO
Abstract Introduction: This publication aims to show the clinical, endoscopic, and histological responses of two pediatric patients who received dupilumab as a management strategy for eosinophilic esophagitis. Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the alpha chain of the interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 receptors involved in the Th2 inflammatory response. The potential therapeutic role of this biological drug has been demonstrated in pediatric clinical trials in other allergic pathologies, such as atopic dermatitis and asthma, with an adequate safety and effectiveness profile. Clinical cases: Two children with a personal history of atopy, allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy began with gastrointestinal symptoms that confirmed the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Despite the different management strategies, adequate control of the disease was not achieved, and it is considered that they benefited from management with dupilumab due to the disease evolution and the coexistence of uncontrolled atopic dermatitis. Conclusions: In recent years, various management strategies in pediatrics have been published, particularly high-dose proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, and elimination diets. However, despite these strategies, at least one-third of patients may fail to achieve remission with initial treatment, making this entity a therapeutic challenge for the gastroenterologist and pediatric allergist. Our patients received the dose recommended for their weight and age and approved for asthma and atopic dermatitis, resulting in clinical and histological remission. The improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms was accompanied by better control of asthma, rhinitis, and dermatitis. None of the patients had adverse effects of the medication.
Resumen Introducción: El objetivo de esta publicación es mostrar la respuesta clínica, endoscópica e histológica de dos pacientes pediátricos que recibieron dupilumab como estrategia de manejo para esofagitis eosinofílica. El dupilumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal que inhibe la cadena alfa del receptor de las interleucinas 4 y 13, involucradas en la respuesta inflamatoria Th2. El potencial rol terapéutico de este medicamento biológico se ha demostrado en ensayos clínicos en pediatría en otras patologías alérgicas como la dermatitis atópica y el asma, y ha mostrado un adecuado perfil de seguridad y efectividad en pediatría. Casos clínicos: Se trata de dos niños con antecedentes personales de atopia, rinitis alérgica, asma, dermatitis atópica y alergia alimentaria, que inician con síntomas gastrointestinales que conducen a confirmar el diagnóstico de esofagitis eosinofílica, en quienes a pesar de las diferentes estrategias de manejo no se logra un adecuado control de la enfermedad, y se considera que se benefician del manejo con dupilumab por la evolución de la enfermedad, así como la coexistencia de dermatitis atópica no controlada. Conclusiones: En los últimos años se han publicado diferentes estrategias de manejo en pediatría, entre los que se destaca el uso de inhibidores de la bomba de protones a dosis altas, corticoides tópicos y las dietas de exclusión; sin embargo, a pesar de estas estrategias, al menos un tercio de los pacientes puede fallar en lograr la remisión con el manejo inicial, lo que convierte a esta entidad en un reto terapéutico para el gastroenterólogo y el alergólogo pediatra. Nuestros pacientes recibieron la dosis recomendada para su peso y edad aprobada en asma y dermatitis atópica, y se logró la remisión clínica e histológica. La mejoría de los síntomas gastrointestinales se acompañó de un mejor control del asma, la rinitis y la dermatitis. Ninguno de los pacientes tuvo efectos adversos al medicamento.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) circuit is an important technical aspect of this medical procedure. Most studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of citrate use have been carried out in adults, and little evidence is available for the pediatric patient population. The aim of this study was to compare regional citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparin anticoagulation in terms of the lifetime of hemofilters in a pediatric population receiving CRRT at a pediatric center in Bogota, Colombia. METHODS: This was an analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study in which we assessed the survival of 150 hemofilters (citrate group 80 hemofilters, heparin group 70 hemofilters) used in a total of 3442 hours of CCRT (citrate group 2248 h, heparin group 1194 h). Hemofilter survival was estimated beginning at placement and continuing until filter replacement due to clotting or high trans-membrane pressures. RESULTS: Hemofilter survival was higher in the citrate group than in the heparin group (72 vs. 18 h; p <0.0001). Bivariate analysis showed that the hemofilter coagulation risk was significantly increased when heparin was used, regardless of hemofilter size and pump flow (hazard ratio 3.70, standard error 0.82, 95% confidence interval 2.39-5.72; p <0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation could be more effective than heparin systemic anticoagulation in terms of prolonging the hemofilter lifetime in patients with acute renal injury who require CRRT.