RESUMO
Early T-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) has a dismal prognosis. Nelarabine is a purine nucleoside analog that increases the apoptosis rate in T-cell lymphoblasts. We present a 30-year-old patient diagnosed with T-cell ALL. He was a high-risk patient because of an early precursor phenotype and a complex karyotype that had been refractory to three previous lines of treatment. He started a course of nelarabine (1500 mg/m for three days), pegylated-asparaginase, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (Nelarabine Peg-Asp AdmVP). He reached complete remission and received an allogeneic sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplant with fludarabine, total body irradiation, and cyclophosphamide as the conditioning regimen. He developed a pulmonary mycosis, which resolved, and grade-2 neurotoxicity in his upper and lower limbs. He was discharged after 40 days and to date remains with 23 months of complete remission. The Nelarabine Peg-Asp AdmVP regimen seems to be effective and safe. Further research is needed to establish it as an induction treatment in refractory early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leucemia.
RESUMO
This short paper focuses on the role of mathematical models to analyze the impact of pandemics on health resources and the different trade-offs that may be included in them. There is a large body of literature suggesting that mathematical modeling may be helpful to estimate how much additional equipment and infrastructure are necessary to mitigate an increase in demand for health services during a large-scale outbreak of an infectious disease. I comment on the crucial role of these models with a special focus on their strengths and limitations.
Este breve documento se centra en el papel de los modelos matemáticos para analizar el impacto de las pandemias en los recursos de salud y las diferentes trade-off que pueden estar presente. Existe una gran cantidad de literatura que sugiere que los modelos matemáticos pueden ser útiles para estimar cuánto equipo e infraestructura adicionales pueden ser necesarios para mitigar un aumento en la demanda de servicios de salud durante un brote a gran escala de una enfermedad infecciosa. Comento sobre el papel crucial de estos modelos con un enfoque especial en sus fortalezas y limitaciones.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde , Modelos Teóricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Chile , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Background The treatment of choice of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is an induction with proteasome inhibitors followed autologous stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Since 2013, the treatment of these patients in the public system is based on CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone). Aim To evaluate the response rates achieved with CTD, and the results of HSCT in patients with NDMM in the public setting. Material and Methods Data from patients considered as candidates for HSCT from different centers of the National Adult Antineoplastic Drug Program (PANDA, for its acronym in Spanish), diagnosed between 2013 and 2017, was analyzed. The response to treatment of first and second lines of treatment was evaluated, in addition to the results of HSCT. An optimal Response was defined as the sum of strict complete remission, complete remission and very good partial response (sCR, CR and VGPR). Results One hundred and seventy-seven patients were analyzed, 54% women, and 53% with IgG multiple myeloma. Information about the international staging system was retrieved in 127 patients (71%). Seventeen percent were ISS I, 22% in ISS II and 32% ISS III. CTD was used as first treatment in 106 patients (60%), and cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) in 13 (7%). As first line, CTD had an overall response of 50.9%, and CyBorD of 76.9%. Thirty patients were treated with bortezomib as second line treatment. Forty patients (22%) underwent HSCT. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) in transplanted patients and non-transplanted patients was 100 and 62% respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions The response rate achieved by CTD in these patients is suboptimal. The response to CyBorD was better.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidadeRESUMO
Background The treatment of choice of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is an induction with proteasome inhibitors followed autologous stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Since 2013, the treatment of these patients in the public system is based on CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone). Aim To evaluate the response rates achieved with CTD, and the results of HSCT in patients with NDMM in the public setting. Material and Methods Data from patients considered as candidates for HSCT from different centers of the National Adult Antineoplastic Drug Program (PANDA, for its acronym in Spanish), diagnosed between 2013 and 2017, was analyzed. The response to treatment of first and second lines of treatment was evaluated, in addition to the results of HSCT. An optimal Response was defined as the sum of strict complete remission, complete remission and very good partial response (sCR, CR and VGPR). Results One hundred and seventy-seven patients were analyzed, 54% women, and 53% with IgG multiple myeloma. Information about the international staging system was retrieved in 127 patients (71%). Seventeen percent were ISS I, 22% in ISS II and 32% ISS III. CTD was used as first treatment in 106 patients (60%), and cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) in 13 (7%). As first line, CTD had an overall response of 50.9%, and CyBorD of 76.9%. Thirty patients were treated with bortezomib as second line treatment. Forty patients (22%) underwent HSCT. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) in transplanted patients and non-transplanted patients was 100 and 62% respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions The response rate achieved by CTD in these patients is suboptimal. The response to CyBorD was better.