Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(4): 882-896, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525231

RESUMO

Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias da Próstata , Radiocirurgia , Masculino , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Oncologia , Radiocirurgia/métodos
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 14(12): 953-60, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22975899

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The essential issue in conservative treatment is the quality in breast preservation. When risk factors for local relapse exist, a tumour bed boost is required, but the boost choice remains controversial. Prospectively, we studied long-term toxicity, cosmetic outcome and prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After conservative treatment, 115 patients received a single dose of 7 Gy HDR-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost between June 1996 and December 2005. Late toxicity was assessed using the LENT-SOMA scale. For esthetic assessment, a subjective scale was used for patients and a modified Fehlauer scale for physicians. Mean age was 56.6 years. Invasive ductal carcinoma (78 %) and lumpectomy (60 %) were predominantly reported. 48 % received chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS: Regarding toxicity, 39 % of patients reported breast pain, 75 % fibrosis, 56 % telangiectasias, 19 % lymphoedema, and 51 % retraction/atrophy. Concerning management, 22 % of patients with pain and 45 % with lymphoedema were treated. The esthetic result was found satisfactory by 96 % of the patients and 85 % of the physicians. Fibrosis was influenced by CT and a larger irradiated volume and telangiectasias by a greater implant volume. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BT boost shows good cosmetic effects with acceptable toxicity. Patients overestimate the esthetic outcome. LENT/SOMA is useful to assess chronic toxicity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mama/efeitos da radiação , Mama/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 14(5): 362-8, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22551542

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conservative treatment represents the current therapy for early-stage breast cancer. When risk factors for local relapse exist, a tumour bed boost is required. Retrospectively, we evaluated the prognostic factors influencing local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: After conservative treatment, 210 patients received a single-dose HDR brachytherapy (HDRBT) boost between June 1996 and December 2005. Mean age was 57 years; 75% had invasive ductal carcinoma. The most frequent surgery was lumpectomy (55.7%); 39.4% were G3, 18.6% intraductal component >25% and only 22% had negative margins. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 85 months, at 5 and 10 years the OS was 93% and 88%, DFS 92% and 89%, and LR 3.6% and 5.3%, respectively. For LR, the risk factors were carcinoma in situ, N+ and involved margins, whereas for metastasis, the risk factors were T2 tumours, stage III, N+ and the presence of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: HDR-BT boost in one fraction is an effective, simple and safe method for reducing LR. The outpatient setting and shorter treatment duration represent undeniable advantages.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Lobular/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 10(11): 758-60, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19015073

RESUMO

Granulocytic sarcoma (GS), an uncommon solid extramedullary tumour, should be considered even in the absence of leukaemia, as delay in diagnosis and treatment worsens the prognosis. We present a GS (single humeral bone lesion) in a non-leukaemia patient, treated with intensive AML (Acute Myeloid Leukaemia) chemotherapy and sequential radiotherapy, in complete response 26 months after diagnosis, confirmed by histopathology and without leukaemia progression.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Úmero/patologia , Sarcoma Mieloide/diagnóstico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Substituição , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Neoplasias Ósseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/etiologia , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Humanos , Úmero/cirurgia , Idarubicina/administração & dosagem , Osteólise/etiologia , Indução de Remissão , Sarcoma Mieloide/complicações , Sarcoma Mieloide/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoma Mieloide/patologia , Sarcoma Mieloide/radioterapia , Sarcoma Mieloide/cirurgia , Fraturas do Ombro/etiologia , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 7(8): 344-50, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16185603

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The dose administered to the tumour bed is a risk-factor for local recurrence in localised breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients (n=94) received 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy and one application of 700 cGy at 85% isodose with high dose rate brachytherapy. RESULTS: Of the cases, 84% were infiltrating ductal carcinoma; 31.2% were G3; 28% were intraductal component > 25%; 54% had margin < 1 cm or unknown. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range: 36-107 months), the overall actuarial survival at 5 and 8 years was 93.2% and 84.2%, respectively; disease-free survival was 88.3% and 84.6%, respectively; local control was 92.2% and 88.75%, respectively. Local recurrence rate was 5.3%, and distant dissemination rate was 8.5%. Among the risk-factors analysed, only the presence of 4 or more lymph node involvement implied a higher risk for local recurrence (p =0.0001). For distant dissemination, the risk-factors were: 4 or more lymph nodes involved (p = 0.0001),G3 (p =0.029), tumour >3 cm (p = 0.001), irradiation volume with external beam radiotherapy (p =0.0001), and presence of local recurrence (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: High dose rate brachytherapy is an effective method for reducing local recurrence, and increasing local control.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA