RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether ultrasound-detected hernias (UDH) are the sole cause of pain in patients with groin pain, and clinical examination plays a complementary role. The aim of our study is to describe the evolution of patients with ultrasound detected hernias in terms of development of groin hernia detected by physical examination, pain resolution, and alternative diagnosis. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, longitudinal study of a prospective case series including patients with UDH with groin pain. Follow-up evaluation included the following: follow-up time, side of pain, its evolution, time to resolution, clinical hernia (CH) development, need for surgical resolution, and the presence of postoperative pain and alternative diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients with complete follow-up for groin pain and UDH were included. Seven patients (7.1%) developed CH, with a median time to conversion of 8 months. Four of them (4.1% of the total and 57.1% of the ones who developed CH) ended up having surgery. Fifty-three patients (54.1%) resolved their pain in a median time to resolution of 2 months, and 75.5% of them did so spontaneously. The majority of patients with persistent pain (73.3%) were able to lead a normal life and only reported pain with movement. More than half of the patients (53.3%) reached a specific diagnosis. Among those patients who did not develop CH, 39.6% reached an alternative diagnosis, the majority being musculoskeletal pathologies. CONCLUSION: Watchful waiting and a thorough search for other alternative causes of groin pain in UDH and clinically occult hernia would be a reasonable option.
Assuntos
Virilha , Hérnia Inguinal , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Virilha/diagnóstico por imagem , Virilha/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia , Dor Pós-Operatória , HerniorrafiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (US-TAP) is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, although it has certain limitations. To overcome them, surgeons have developed several techniques to perform local anesthetic infiltration under laparoscopic guidance, but no trials evaluating these in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair were conducted till the date. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a novel laparoscopic-guided local anesthetic infiltration technique (LDAI) with US-TAP in postoperative pain control and analgesic consumption for patients undergoing elective TAPP hernia repair. METHODS: This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted at a single tertiary academic center between 2019 and 2020 on adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were compared for LDAI vs. US-TAP up to 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: 62 patients were included (31 LDAI, 31 US-TAP). Female gender was significantly higher in the LDAI group (8, 25.81%; US-TAP 0; p = 0.005). Mean anesthetic time (US-TAP group: 142.2 min, SD = 17.7; LDAI group: 127.1 min, SD = 15.5; p < 0.001) and mean operative time (US-TAP group: 117.2 min, SD = 15.9; LDAI group: 103.8 min, SD = 15.2; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the LDAI group. Pain scores assessed at the first-hour postoperative, at the moment of discharge, and at 8, 24, and 48 postoperative hours showed no significant differences between both groups. No significant difference was found regarding postoperative analgesic rescue administration in the recovery room and analgesic consumption after discharge between groups. CONCLUSION: LDAI is a safe and effective local anesthetic technique in elective TAPP hernia repair. Pain control is similar to US-TAP block, with shorter anesthesthetic and surgical time and better health resources allocation.