RESUMO
ABSTRACT Purpose: The purpose of this study was to objectively assess the optical vision quality of patients before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification using a double-pass retinal imaging system. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 26 pseudophakic eyes with posterior capsular opacification that underwent Nd:YAG capsulotomy. The objective scatter indices, modulation transfer function cutoff frequencies, Strehl ratios, and logMAR corrected distance visual acuities were assessed before and after YAG capsulotomy with a double-pass retinal imaging system (OQAS II, Visiometrics, Spain). We also analyzed data from a subgroup of 10 patients with pre-YAG corrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logMAR (20/25) or better. Results: Vision quality indices improved in all 26 eyes, resulting in a statistically significant improvement in the corrected distance visual acuity (p=0.007), objective scatter index (p=0.001), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (p=0.001), and Strehl ratio (p=0.020). The overall mean improvements included 0.12 ± 0.04 logMAR for corrected distance visual acuity, 2.84 ± 0.76 for objective scatter index, 12.29 ± 2.77 for modulation transfer function cutoff frequency, and 0.06 ± 0.03 for Strehl ratio. Our sub-analysis of 10 eyes with 0.10 logMAR (20/25) corrected distance visual acuity or better also showed a statistically significant improvement in the mean objective scatter index (0.76 ± 16; p=0.001), resulting in approximately 35% decrease in intraocular light scatter. Conclusions: The objective vision quality measurements as assessed by the double-pass retinal imaging system showed a significant improvement after YAG capsulotomy. This suggests that the objective scatter index improves after YAG capsulotomy, even in eyes with pre-YAG 0.10 logMAR (Snellen 20/25) corrected distance visual acuity or better.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar objetivamente a qualidade da visão óptica antes e depois da capsulotomia com Nd: YAG, obtida por imagem pelo metodo de dupla passagem de luz em pacientes com opacificação capsular posterior. Método: Análise retrospectiva de 26 olhos pseudofácicos com opacificação capsular posterior visualmente significativa, que foram submetidos à capsulotomia de Nd: YAG. O índice de dispersão objetiva, a função de transferência de modulação, a relação de Strehl e a acuidade visual à distância corrigida foram avaliados antes e após a capsulotomia com YAG usando o dupla passagem de luz (OQAS II, Visiometrics, Espanha). Também foi analisado um subgrupo de pacientes com acuidade visual à distância corrigida pré-YAG de 0,10 logMAR (20/25) ou melhor. Resultados: Os índices de qualidade da visão melhoraram em todos os 26 olhos, resultando em uma melhora estatisticamente significativa na acuidade visual à distância corrigida (p=0,007), índice de dispersão objetiva (p=0,001), função de transferência de modulação (p=0,001) e relação de Strehl (p=0,020). A melhora média na acuidade visual à distância corrigida foi de 0,12 ± 0,04 logMAR, no índice de dispersão objetiva foi de 2,84 ± 0,76, no função de transferência de modulação foi de 12,29 ± 2,77 e na razão de Strehl foi de 0,06 ± 0,03 em todos os olhos. Sub-análise de 10 olhos com 0.10 logMAR (20/25) acuidade visual à distância corrigida ou melhor também mostrou uma melhora estatisticamente significativa no índice de dispersão objetiva (p=0,001). A melhora média no OSI foi de 0,76 ± 16, uma diminuição de 35% na dispersão da luz intraocular. Conclusões: A qualidade da visão avaliada pelo dupla passagem de luz mostra uma melhora significativa nas medidas objetivas da qualidade da visão após a capsulotomia do YAG. O índice de dispersão objetiva melhora após a capsulotomia YAG, mesmo em olhos com acuidade visual à distância corrigida pré-YAG de 0,10 logMAR (Snellen 20/25) ou melhor.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Opacificação da Cápsula/fisiopatologia , Capsulotomia Posterior/reabilitação , Valores de Referência , Retina/fisiopatologia , Retina/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pseudofacia/diagnóstico por imagem , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Opacificação da Cápsula/diagnóstico por imagem , Capsulotomia Posterior/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to objectively assess the optical vision quality of patients before and after Nd:YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsular opacification using a double-pass retinal imaging system. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 26 pseudophakic eyes with posterior capsular opacification that underwent Nd:YAG capsulotomy. The objective scatter indices, modulation transfer function cutoff frequencies, Strehl ratios, and logMAR corrected distance visual acuities were assessed before and after YAG capsulotomy with a double-pass retinal imaging system (OQAS II, Visiometrics, Spain). We also analyzed data from a subgroup of 10 patients with pre-YAG corrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logMAR (20/25) or better. RESULTS: Vision quality indices improved in all 26 eyes, resulting in a statistically significant improvement in the corrected distance visual acuity (p=0.007), objective scatter index (p=0.001), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (p=0.001), and Strehl ratio (p=0.020). The overall mean improvements included 0.12 ± 0.04 logMAR for corrected distance visual acuity, 2.84 ± 0.76 for objective scatter index, 12.29 ± 2.77 for modulation transfer function cutoff frequency, and 0.06 ± 0.03 for Strehl ratio. Our sub-analysis of 10 eyes with 0.10 logMAR (20/25) corrected distance visual acuity or better also showed a statistically significant improvement in the mean objective scatter index (0.76 ± 16; p=0.001), resulting in approximately 35% decrease in intraocular light scatter. CONCLUSIONS: The objective vision quality measurements as assessed by the double-pass retinal imaging system showed a significant improvement after YAG capsulotomy. This suggests that the objective scatter index improves after YAG capsulotomy, even in eyes with pre-YAG 0.10 logMAR (Snellen 20/25) corrected distance visual acuity or better.
Assuntos
Opacificação da Cápsula/fisiopatologia , Capsulotomia Posterior/reabilitação , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Opacificação da Cápsula/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Capsulotomia Posterior/métodos , Pseudofacia/diagnóstico por imagem , Valores de Referência , Retina/diagnóstico por imagem , Retina/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity in patients who had a spherical intraocular lens (IOL) (SoFlex SE, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in one eye and an aspheric IOL (SofPort AO, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in the fellow eye during uncomplicated cataract surgery. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, double-blind study was performed. Forty patients (80 eyes) underwent bilateral phacoemulsification with implantation of a spherical IOL in one eye and an aspheric IOL in the fellow eye. Postoperatively, visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity tests were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t and Wilcoxon tests, and mixed effects were used for each contrast condition situation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (30 women, 9 men; 78 eyes) with a mean age of 69.3±6.17 years (range: 51 to 82 years) completed the study. No statistical differences were found regarding visual acuity among eyes. Lower levels of higher order aberrations were achieved in the aspheric group. No statistical difference between groups under photopic conditions was noted. In low spatial frequencies, better performance was observed with the aspheric IOL under mesopic conditions. In high spatial frequencies, the spherical IOL produced better quality of vision. Comparing mesopic conditions with glare, visual performance was statistically better using the aspheric IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery results cannot be measured by means of visual acuity alone. Quality of vision must be considered, and implantation of IOLs with low levels of spherical aberrations and better contrast sensitivity are preferred. In this study, the aspheric IOL demonstrated better visual function, especially at night, when compared with spherical IOLs.
Assuntos
Sensibilidades de Contraste/fisiologia , Aberrações de Frente de Onda da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Facoemulsificação , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Aberrometria , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Acuidade Visual/fisiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To present the prospective application of the Orbscan II central 2-mm total-mean corneal power obtained by quantitative area topography in intraocular lens (IOL) calculation after refractive surgery. METHODS: Calculated and achieved refraction and the difference between them were studied in 77 eyes of 61 patients with previous radial keratotomy (RK), RK and additional surgeries, myopic LASIK, myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), or hyperopic LASIK who underwent phacoemulsification without complications in 3 eye centers. All IOL calculations used the average from the central 2-mm Orbscan II total-mean power of maps centered on the pupil without the use of previous refractive data. Six IOL styles implanted within the bag were used. RESULTS: Using the SRK-T formula, the overall calculated refraction was -0.64+/-0.93 diopters (D). The overall achieved spherical equivalent refraction (-0.52+/-0.79 D; range: -3.12 to 1.25 D; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.70/-0.34 D) was +/-0.50 D in 53% of eyes, +/-1.00 D in 78% of eyes, and +/-2.00 D in 99% of eyes. The overall difference between the calculated and achieved refraction (0.12+/-0.93 D, P=.27; range: -2.18 to 2.62 D; 95% CI: 0.09/0.33 D) was +/-0.50 D in 39% of eyes, +/-1.00 D in 77% of eyes, and +/-2.00 D in 96% of eyes. This difference was +/-1.00 D in 77% of eyes with RK (P=.70), 82% of eyes with myopic LASIK (P=.34), and 90% of eyes with myopic PRK (P=.96). In eyes with RK followed by LASIK, a trend toward undercorrection was noted (P=.03). In eyes with hyperopic LASIK, a trend toward overcorrection was noted (P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery, IOL power calculation can be performed with reasonable accuracy using the Orbscan II central 2-mm total-mean power. This method had better outcomes in eyes with previous RK, myopic LASIK, and myopic PRK than in eyes with hyperopic LASIK or RK with LASIK.