RESUMO
Modern human populations differ in developmental processes and in several phenotypic traits. However, the link between ontogenetic variation and human diversification has not been frequently addressed. Here, we analysed craniofacial ontogenies by means of geometric-morphometrics of Europeans and Southern Africans, according to dental and chronological ages. Results suggest that different adult cranial morphologies between Southern Africans and Europeans arise by a combination of processes that involve traits modified during the prenatal life and others that diverge during early postnatal ontogeny. Main craniofacial changes indicate that Europeans differ from Southern Africans by increasing facial developmental rates and extending the attainment of adult size and shape. Since other studies have suggested that native subsaharan populations attain adulthood earlier than Europeans, it is probable that facial ontogeny is linked with other developmental mechanisms that control the timing of maturation in other variables. Southern Africans appear as retaining young features in adulthood. Facial ontogeny in Europeans produces taller and narrower noses, which seems as an adaptation to colder environments. The lack of these morphological traits in Neanderthals, who lived in cold environments, seems a paradox, but it is probably the consequence of a warm-adapted faces together with precocious maturation. When modern Homo sapiens migrated into Asia and Europe, colder environments might establish pressures that constrained facial growth and development in order to depart from the warm-adapted morphology. Our results provide some answers about how cranial growth and development occur in two human populations and when developmental shifts take place providing a better adaptation to environmental constraints.
Assuntos
População Negra , Crânio/crescimento & desenvolvimento , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , África Austral/etnologia , Análise de Variância , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Cefalometria , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente)/etnologia , Face/anatomia & histologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão , Análise de Componente Principal , Crânio/anatomia & histologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Sixty male crania from three Platyrrhini and three Catarrhini genera were measured by means of the craniofunctional method. The aim was to analyze functional components of the skull and relate their function and the degree of encephalization to life history variables. We recognized two major and eight minor functional components. The objectives were to test (1) if within-taxa (Platyrrhini or Catarrhini) and/or between-taxa (Platyrrhini and Catarrhini) comparisons showed minor-component differentiation; and (2) if encephalization affects both primate groups differently. After standardization by size and scaling, 15 possible within-taxa and between-taxa comparisons were made. We found a strong phylogenetic signal, i.e., cranial differences were not randomly distributed, with the between-taxa variation being greater than within-taxa. Both hypotheses tested were accepted since: (1) There was no random variation between functional cranial components. They followed definite patterns for ancestral and derived traits. (2) Encephalization was present in all scaled comparisons, with Platyrrhini showing a higher degree of encephalization than Catarrhini. We conclude that major and minor craniofunctional components should be considered as correlated traits related to life history, because we found different patterns between platyrrhines and catarrhines, and within species of both taxa.