RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a knee brace compared with minimal intervention on self-reported kinesiophobia and function, objective function, and physical activity level in people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). DESIGN: Single-blind randomized controlled trial (1:1), parallel. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with PFP (N=50). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia). Secondary: self-reported function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), physical activity level (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and objective function (forward step-down test). Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the intervention (2wk) (T1), and at 6 weeks after baseline (T2). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 interventions groups: (1) use of knee brace for 2 weeks during daily living, sports, or painful tasks (brace group) and (2) educational leaflet with information about PFP (leaflet group). RESULTS: The knee brace reduced kinesiophobia in people with PFP compared with minimal intervention with moderate effect size at T1=mean difference (95% CI) -5.56 (-9.18 to -1.93) and T2=-5.24 (-8.58 to -1.89). There was no significant difference in self-reported and objective function and physical activity level. CONCLUSIONS: The knee brace improved kinesiophobia immediately after intervention (at 2wk) and at 6-week follow-up in people with PFP compared with minimal intervention. A knee brace may be considered within clinically reasoned paradigms to facilitate exercise therapy interventions for people with PFP.
Assuntos
Braquetes , Medo , Movimento , Síndrome da Dor Patelofemoral/reabilitação , Adolescente , Adulto , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Síndrome da Dor Patelofemoral/psicologia , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: (i) To compare kinesiophobia, pain catastrophism and objective function between women with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and pain-free; (ii) to investigate the association of kinesiophobia and pain catastrophism with objetive function in women with PFP. DESIGN: Case-control. SETTING: Laboratory-based. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five women with PFP and forty pain-free women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophism were assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Scale, respectively. Forward step-down, single leg hop, and modified star balance tests were used to assess objective function. Independent t-tests were used for between-groups comparisons and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to investigate the association between the outcomes. RESULTS: Women with PFP had significantly worse kinesiophobia (pâ¯<â¯0.001; Effect size (ES)â¯=â¯1.16), pain catastrophism (pâ¯<â¯0.001; ESâ¯=â¯1.57), and poorer objective function (step-down, (pâ¯<â¯0.001; ESâ¯=â¯0.99); single-leg hop (pâ¯=â¯0.002; ESâ¯=â¯0.74); modified star balance (pâ¯<â¯0.001; ESâ¯=â¯0.66) than pain-free controls. Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophism were not correlated with objective function. CONCLUSION: Greater kinesiophobia, pain catastrophism and poorer objective function is evident in women with PFP, compared to pain-free controls. Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophism were not associated with objective function in women with PFP. Future research is necessary to understand how other physical and psychological factors might affect objective function.