RESUMO
Resumen Objetivo: medir el impacto de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca en términos de variables ecocardiográficas en pacientes de países latinoamericanos. Método: se realizó un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, intervencionista, en el que los pacientes elegibles fueron llevados, por primera vez, a implante de un dispositivo de resincronización cardiaca. El objetivo primario fue valorar los cambios del tamaño y la función del ventrículo izquierdo por medio de un ecocardiograma previo al implante del dispositivo y en el sexto mes. Los objetivos secundarios evaluados fueron hospitalizaciones, cambios en la clase funcional, mortalidad, calidad de vida y un score compuesto clínico basado en estos factores de evaluación global del paciente. Resultados: para cumplir el objetivo primario se analizaron datos de 75 sujetos. La edad promedio fue de 63,7 años; 21.3% fueron mujeres y 30.7% tuvieron cardiopatía isquémica. Al sexto mes de seguimiento las mediciones de volumen de fin de diástole y sístole del ventrículo izquierdo disminuyeron en promedio 37.6 ml y 37.8 ml, respectivamente. La fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo en promedio se incrementó un 11%. El puntaje compuesto clínico mostró mejoría en el 86.4% de los pacientes en el sexto mes postimplante del resincronizador. Conclusiones: se observó remodelado inverso del ventrículo izquierdo y mejoría en el estado clínico de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca y disfunción sistólica del ventrículo izquierdo que recibieron terapia de resincronización cardiaca en el ámbito de la práctica clínica de rutina.
Abstract Objective: To measure the impact of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in terms of cardiac ultrasound variables in patients from Latin-American countries. Method: A prospective, multicentre, interventionist study was conducted, in which the eligible patients were those that had a cardiac resynchronisation device implanted for the first time. The primary objective was to assess the changes in size and left ventricular function by means of a cardiac ultrasound carried out prior to implanting the device and in the sixth month. The secondary objectives evaluated were hospital admissions, change in functional class, mortality, quality of life, and an overall assessment of the patient using a combined clinical score based on these factors. Results: A total of 75 subjects were analysed in order to complete the primary objective. The mean age was 63.7 years; 21.3% were female, and 30.7% had ischaemic heart disease. At the sixth month, the left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volume decreased by a mean of 37.6 ml and 37.8 ml, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction increased by a mean of 11%. The combined clinical score showed an improvement in 86.4% of the patients in the sixth month after the implantation of the synchronisation device. Conclusions: A reverse remodelling of the left ventricle was observed, as well as an improvement in the clinical stage of patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction that received cardiac resynchronisation treatment in the setting of routine clinical practice.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Terapêutica , Ecocardiografia , MortalidadeRESUMO
AIMS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the application of accepted international implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) guidelines for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PLASMA (Probabilidad de Sufrir Muerte Arritmica) study was designed to characterize management of cardiac patients in Latin America. Twelve centres included 1958 consecutively admitted patients in cardiology units in 2008 and 2009. Discharged patients were evaluated for primary prevention, ICD indication and prescription by general cardiologists. Of 1711 discharged patients, 1525 (89%) had data available for evaluating indication status. Class I indications for ICD therapy were met for 153 (10%) patients based on collected data. Only 20 (13%, 95% confidence interval: 7.7-18.4%) patients with indication were prescribed an ICD. Patients prescribed an ICD were younger than patients who were not prescribed an ICD (62 vs. 68 years, P < 0.01). The reasons given by cardiologists for not prescribing an ICD for 133 patients with an indication were: indication criteria not met (75%), life expectancy <1 year (9.7%), rejection by the patient (5.2%), no medical coverage paying for the device (3.7%), psychiatric patient (2.2%), and other reasons (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In Latin America, international guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation are not well followed. The main reason is that cardiologists believe that patients do not meet indication criteria, even though study data confirm that criteria are met. This poses a significant challenge and underlines the importance of continuous and improved medical education.