RESUMO
A oleorresina obtida de copaíferas é amplamente utilizada na medicina tradicional brasileira. Este estudo avaliou a composição química por Cromatografia Gasosa (CG) e o efeito da oleorresina de Copaifera officinalis em células-tronco. Para isso as células foram tratadas com a oleorresina nas concentrações de 0,5, 20, 110, 140, 170 ou 200 µg/ml por 24h. A avaliação por CG identificou os sesquiterpenos ß-cariofileno, trans-α-bergamoteno e óxido de cariofileno II como os compostos majoritários da oleorresina. As menores concentrações de oleorresina utilizadas apresentaram resultados semelhantes ao grupo controle e as maiores concentrações diminuíram significativamente a viabilidade celular e apresentaram maior citotoxicidade. Como conclusão, os principais componentes encontrados na oleorresina de copaíba foram os sesquiterpenos e as baixas concentrações testadas não foram citotóxicas. O aumento das concentrações de oleorresina de copaíba promoveu diminuição da viabilidade celular e aumento dos efeitos citotóxicos nas células-tronco. Embora a oleorresina de copaíba tenha uso etnofarmacológico na cicatrização, este estudo demonstrou efeito citotóxico em células-tronco, as quais estão relacionadas ao processo de regeneração corpóreo. Portanto, deve-se ter cuidado com a dosagem de oleorresina a ser utilizada, uma vez que este estudo in vitro mostrou citotoxicidade e um impacto negativo na viabilidade das células-tronco nas mais altas concentrações testadas. [au]
Oleoresinobtained from Copaifera trees is extensively used in Brazilian traditional medicine. This study hasevaluated the chemical composition and effect of Copaifera officinalisoleoresin on stem cells. The oleoresin was analyzed by Gas Chromatography (GC) and the cells were treated with the oleoresin at concentrations of 0.5, 20, 110, 140, 170 or 200 µg/ml for 24h for cellular tests. GC identified the sesquiterpenes beta-caryophyllene, trans-alpha-bergamotene, and caryophyllene oxide II as the main compounds in oleoresin. The cell viability and cytotoxicity assays showed the lowest concentrations of oleoresin used presented similar results to the control group and the higher concentrations tested significantly decreased cell viability and increased cytotoxicity. In a conclusion, the main components found in copaiba oleoresin were sesquiterpenes and the low tested concentrations were not cytotoxic. The increased concentrations of copaiba oleoresin promoted a decrease in cell viability and an increase of cytotoxicity in the stem cells. Although copaiba oleoresin has ethnopharmacology use in healing, this study showed toxicity in stem cells, which are related to the corporeal regeneration process. Therefore, caution must be taken with the dosage of the oleoresin to be used since this in vitro study showed cytotoxicity and a negative impact on stem cell viability at the higher tested concentrations. [au]
RESUMO
The authors hereby declare that the Figure 4 in page eight of the paper "Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth modulate early astrocyte response after spinal cord contusion" authored by Fabrício Nicola and colleagues (DOI: 10.1007/s12035-018-1127-4) was mistakenly included.
RESUMO
The transplantation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) has been studied as a possible treatment strategy for spinal cord injuries (SCIs) due to its potential for promoting tissue protection and functional recovery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the early transplantation of SHED on glial scar formation and astrocytic reaction after an experimental model of SCI. Wistar rats were spinalized using the NYU Impactor. Animals were randomly distributed into three groups: control (naive) (animal with no manipulation); SCI (receiving laminectomy followed by SCI and treated with vehicle), and SHED (SCI rat treated with intraspinal SHED transplantation, 1 h after SCI). In vitro investigation demonstrated that SHED were able to express mesenchymal stem cells, vimentin and S100B markers, related with neural progenitor and glial cells, respectively. The acute SHED transplantation promoted functional recovery, measured as from the first week after spinal cord contusion by Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale. Twenty-four and 48 h after lesion, flow cytometry revealed a spinal cord vimentin+ cells increment in the SHED group. The increase of vimentin+ cells was confirmed by immunofluorescence. Moreover, the bioavailability of astrocytic proteins such as S100B and Kir4.1 shown to be increased in the spinal cord of SHED group, whereas there was a glial scar reduction, as indicated by ELISA and Western blot techniques. The presented results support that SHED act as a neuroprotector agent after transplantation, probably through paracrine signaling to reduce glial scar formation, inducing tissue plasticity and functional recovery.