RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a cervical cavity extending 1 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on fracture resistance and failure mode of maxillary central incisors that have been treated endodontically, present with complete and incomplete ferrules, and are restored with and without a fiber post. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 50 intact human maxillary central incisors were divided into five groups (n=10): CG (control group) 6-mm fer-rule height, no cervical cavity, and without post; (CO) 6-mm ferrule height without post, with a cervical cavity (access to root canal and cervical cavity restored with composite resin), cervical cavity; and post with ferrule heights of 1 mm (CP1), 2 mm (CP2), and 6 mm (CP6) restored with fiberglass post and composite resin core. After complete metal crowns were cemented on all specimens, they were subjected to thermal cycling (6000 cycles, 5°C/55°C), followed by immediate testing of fracture resistance. After failure, the specimens were sectioned buccolingually to evaluate and identify the mode of failure. The data were analyzed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison tests (α =0.05). RESULTS: A 1-mm ferrule height (CP1) fracture resistance was significantly lower (531±125 N) compared to the 6-mm ferrule height (CP6) (769±175 N) (p<0.05). With respect to the groups with similar residual dentin, with and without a cervical cavity, CG (667±119 N) and CO (668±119 N), the presence of a post (CP6) increased the resistance to fracture, although no statistically significant difference was demonstrated. Partial decementation was observed in all specimens of CG and CP6, in nine of CP1 and CP2, and in three in CO. Root fractures occurred in 23 specimens. The root surface was exposed 2 mm below the CEJ to simulate bone level. Propagation of subosseous cracks occurred in four specimens in CG and CP2, in seven specimens in CP6, in two specimens in CP1, and in six specimens in CO. All were considered catastrophic failures. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study it is suggested that, when restoring an endodontically treated maxillary central incisor that has a cervical lesion and needs to be restored with a complete crown, a fiber post is cemented to improve fracture resistance.
Assuntos
Técnica para Retentor Intrarradicular , Fraturas dos Dentes , Dente não Vital , Resinas Compostas/uso terapêutico , Coroas , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Humanos , IncisivoRESUMO
AIM: To compare the efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation when retreating oval-shaped root canals. METHODOLOGY: Sixty human premolars with single oval canals were instrumented and filled with gutta-percha and sealer and divided into three groups (n = 20)--group 1: ProFile .04 taper rotary instruments; group 2: Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET), and group 3: manual instrumentation with Hedström files. The teeth were split longitudinally and gutta-percha/sealer remnants in the coronal, middle and apical thirds were assessed with light microscopy. The mean percentage of gutta-percha/sealer remnants for each group was calculated and statistically analysed for significance using an ANOVA repeated measures (P < 0.001) and Tukey's multiple comparison test. The time required for retreatment was analysed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P < 0.001). RESULTS: Overall, 10-18% of the canal walls were covered with gutta-percha/sealer remnants after preparation using any technique. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the mean values for remnants of filling material in the ProFile group were significantly higher than for the other groups (P < 0.001), except in the apical third where no significant difference occurred. In all groups, the mean values in the middle third were higher than the coronal and apical thirds. The retreatment time for ProFile and AET was significantly shorter compared to manual instrumentation with Hedström files (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Under the experimental conditions, AET instruments and manual instrumentation with Hedström files resulted in cleaner canals. However, completely clean root canal walls were not produced with any of the techniques investigated.
Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar/patologia , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Dente Pré-Molar/patologia , Clorofórmio/química , Ligas Dentárias , Desenho de Equipamento , Guta-Percha/química , Guta-Percha/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Níquel , Retratamento , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/química , Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Obturação do Canal Radicular , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Rotação , Solventes/química , Aço Inoxidável , Propriedades de Superfície , Titânio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: To compare in vitro the cleanliness of root canal walls in oval-shaped root canals following automated or manual instrumentation. METHODOLOGY: Forty-five oval-shaped single-rooted maxillary and mandibular premolars with straight canals were divided into three groups of 15. Automated canal preparation was performed using Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET, group 1) and the ProFile system (group 2). Manual instrumentation (group 3) was performed with K-Flexofiles. Irrigation was performed using alternately 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, followed by rinsing with saline. The roots were split longitudinally into halves and the canals examined at x200 and x400 in a scanning electron microscope. The presence of debris and smear layer was recorded at distances of 1, 5 and 10 mm from the working length using a three-step scoring scale and a 300 mum square grid. Mean scores for debris and smear layer were calculated and statistically analysed for significance (P < 0.05) between and within groups, using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric anova and Dunn's tests. RESULTS: At 1, 5 and 10-mm levels the root canals prepared with AET had significantly less surface debris and smear layer on the canal walls compared with canals prepared with ProFile or manual instrumentation. For all three groups significantly lower mean smear layer scores (P < 0.05) were recorded at 5 and 10-mm levels compared with the 1 mm level. Significantly lower mean debris scores (P < 0.05) were also recorded at 5 and 10-mm levels for the AET group whereas no significant differences were found between the three levels for the ProFile and manual instrumentation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although better instrumentation scores were obtained in canals prepared with AET, complete cleanliness was not achieved by any of the techniques and instruments investigated.