RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear which pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) credentialing process or if this process is consistent per expert guidelines. Our objective was to describe formalized POCUS credentialing processes across PEDs that are active in the pediatric emergency medicine POCUS (P2) Network. METHODS: A survey was developed from nationally recommended credentialing guidelines. This anonymous survey was sent out to the P2 Network comprising more than 230 members involved in pediatric POCUS. The survey was analyzed using descriptive analysis with counts and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 36 PEDs responded to the survey. All departments had a faculty member in charge of maintaining the credentialing process, and all faculty members had POCUS education available; 88.6% of education was scheduled didactics or bedside teaching. There were 80.6% of PEDs that had a process for internally credentialing faculty. Some PEDs offered protected education for POCUS, however, 44.8% had <50% of their faculty credentialed. There were 4 PEDs that offered incentives for completion of POCUS credentialing including salary bonuses; only 1 offered shift buy down as incentive. That PED had 100% of its faculty credentialed. All PEDs performed quality assurance on POCUS scans done in the ED, most done weekly. Billing for scans occurred in 26 PEDs. Skin/soft tissue and focused assessment with sonography for trauma were the 2 most common applications credentialed. CONCLUSIONS: Among PEDs surveyed, there was a lack of standardization of POCUS resources and components of credentialing. Incentives may be beneficial in improving credentialing faculty and standardizing the credentialing process.
Assuntos
Credenciamento , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/normas , Ultrassonografia/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Pediatria/normas , CriançaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are frequently used in children, allowing fewer air leaks and helping prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia. Tracheal mucosal perfusion is compromised at an ETT cuff pressure (ETTCP) of 30 cm H2O with blood flow completely absent above 50 cm H2O. Our objective was to compare multiple pediatric-sized ETTCPs at ground level and various altitudes during aeromedical transport. METHODS: Simulating the transport environment, 4 pediatric-sized mannequin heads were intubated with appropriately sized cuffed ETTs (3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0) and transported by helicopter or nonpressurized fixed-wing aircraft 20 times each. The ETTCP was set to 10 cm H2O before transport, and the pressure was measured with a standard manometer at 1000-ft intervals until reaching peak altitude or CP greater than 60 cm H2O. Ground elevation ranged from 400-650 ft mean sea level (MSL) and peak altitude from 3500 to 5000 ft MSL. RESULTS: Increased altitude caused a significant increase in ETTCP of all ETT sizes (P < 0.001). However, there is no statistical difference in pressures between ETT sizes (P = 0.28). On average, ETTCP in 3.0, 4.0, and 6.0 ETTs surpassed 30 cm H2O at approximately 1500 ft MSL and 50 cm H2O at approximately 2800 ft MSL. In the 5.0 ETT, the CP reached 30 cm H2O at 2000 ft MSL and 50 cm H2O at 3700 ft MSL. CONCLUSIONS: The ETTCP in pediatric-sized ETTs regularly exceed recommended pressure limits at relatively low altitudes. There is no additional pressure increase related to ETT size. This has the potential to decrease mucosal blood flow, possibly increasing risk of subsequent tracheal stenosis, rupture, and other complications.