RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy has been proposed to help patients build strength with fewer repetitions than standard physical therapy (PT). We sought to determine if BFR would improve quadriceps and hamstring strength in patients with instability and perceived weakness >1 year after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with painful TKAs and flexion instability as well as quadriceps and hamstring weakness who performed a 6-week PT program and received isokinetic strength measurements (ISMs). Thirty-six patients completed a standard PT program (non-BFR) and 12 patients completed a BFR regimen. ISMs were taken before and after PT to quantify quadriceps and hamstring power, torque, and work compared to the contralateral leg. Statistical analysis was conducted on pre-PT and post-PT ISMs and decisions for revision surgery. RESULTS: There were no differences in ISMs after PT between the BFR and non-BFR groups. The non-BFR group showed statistically significant strength improvements in flexion but not extension (+28.7%-32.8%, P = .0145-.255). Although no significant difference was found in the BFR group, they saw improvements in all extension strength metrics (19.4%-23.4%, P = .3315-.3901) and flexion (25.7%-29.9%, P = .1994-.2392). No difference was observed between the groups in the rates of subsequent revision TKA (8.3% vs 16.7%, P = .3362). CONCLUSION: BFR did not improve quadriceps and hamstring strength compared to PT alone in patients with instability and weakness after TKA. Over 80% of total patients chose to avoid revision TKA after completion of focused PT with or without BFR.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Terapia de Restrição de Fluxo Sanguíneo , Humanos , Perna (Membro) , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Dor , Músculo Quadríceps/fisiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature to guide non-operative treatment for patients with problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to quantify how quadriceps and hamstring strength could improve with focused physical therapy (PT) and whether improving leg strength may prevent revision surgery for patients with flexion instability (FI) after TKA. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with FI by one of the 4 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons at a single academic institution. Patients with FI were referred for strength measurements and a focused PT program. In total, 166 patients completed isokinetic testing to quantify their relative quadriceps and hamstring power, torque, and work measures compared to their contralateral leg. Fifty-five (33.5%) patients subsequently completed post-PT isokinetic testing. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate strength deficits in the knee with FI. RESULTS: Patients with FI were found to be 20.5%-38.4% weaker in all strength domains compared to the contralateral leg (P < .001). Patients who completed PT and pre-isokinetic and post-isokinetic testing demonstrated statistically significant gains in all extension metrics by a net range of 24.7%-34.2% (P = .011-.029) and their flexion strength metrics improved by 32.5%-40.2% (P = .002-.005). About 81.9% of patients in this subgroup did not undergo revision TKA. Those subjects who went on to revision did not statistically improve in any strength domain (P = .063-.121). CONCLUSION: Patients with FI after TKA have significantly weaker quadriceps and hamstrings in the operative compared to contralateral leg. Patients who did not undergo revision knee arthroplasty and completed a formal PT program improved quadriceps and hamstring strength by 30%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (Case series).