RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal amount for initial fluid resuscitation is still controversial in sepsis and the contribution of non-resuscitation fluids in fluid balance is unclear. We aimed to investigate the main components of fluid intake and fluid balance in both survivors and non-survivor patients with septic shock within the first 72 hours. METHODS: In this prospective observational study in two intensive care units, we recorded all fluids administered intravenously, orally, or enterally, and losses during specific time intervals from vasopressor initiation: T1 (up to 24 hours), T2 (24 to 48 hours) and T3 (48 to 72 hours). Logistic regression and a mathematical model assessed the association with mortality and the influence of severity of illness. RESULTS: We included 139 patients. The main components of fluid intake varied across different time intervals, with resuscitation and non-resuscitation fluids such as antimicrobials and maintenance fluids being significant contributors in T1 and nutritional therapy in T2/T3. A positive fluid balance both in T1 and T2 was associated with mortality (p = 0.049; p = 0.003), while nutritional support in T2 was associated with lower mortality (p = 0.040). The association with mortality was not explained by severity of illness scores. CONCLUSIONS: Non-resuscitation fluids are major contributors to a positive fluid balance within the first 48 hours of resuscitation. A positive fluid balance in the first 24 and 48 hours seems to independently increase the risk of death, while higher amount of nutrition seems protective. This data might inform fluid stewardship strategies aiming to improve outcomes and minimize complications in sepsis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background: The optimal amount for initial fluid resuscitation is still controversial in sepsis and the contribution of non-resuscitation fluids in fluid balance is unclear. We aimed to investigate the main components of fluid intake and fluid balance in both survivors and non-survivor patients with septic shock within the first 72 hours. Methods: In this prospective observational study in two intensive care units, we recorded all fluids administered intravenously, orally, or enterally, and losses during specific time intervals from vasopressor initiation: T1 (up to 24 hours), T2 (24 to 48 hours) and T3 (48 to 72 hours). Logistic regression and a mathematical model assessed the association with mortality and the influence of severity of illness. Results: We included 139 patients. The main components of fluid intake varied across different time intervals, with resuscitation and non-resuscitation fluids such as antimicrobials and maintenance fluids being significant contributors in T1 and nutritional therapy in T2/T3. A positive fluid balance both in T1 and T2 was associated with mortality (p = 0.049; p = 0.003), while nutritional support in T2 was associated with lower mortality (p = 0.040). The association with mortality was not explained by severity of illness scores. Conclusions: Non-resuscitation fluids are major contributors to a positive fluid balance within the first 48 hours of resuscitation. A positive fluid balance in the first 24 and 48 hours seems to independently increase the risk of death, while higher amount of nutrition seems protective. This data might inform fluid stewardship strategies aiming to improve outcomes and minimize complications in sepsis.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether an increase in mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock and previous systemic arterial hypertension changes microcirculatory and systemic hemodynamic variables compared with patients without arterial hypertension (control). DESIGN: Prospective, nonblinded, interventional study. SETTING: Three ICUs in two teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: After informed consent, we included patients older than 18 years with septic shock for at least 6 hours, sedated, and under mechanical ventilation. We paired patients with and without arterial hypertension by age. INTERVENTIONS: After obtaining systemic and microcirculation baseline hemodynamic variables (time 0), we increased noradrenaline dose to elevate mean arterial pressure up to 85-90 mm Hg before collecting a new set of measurements (time 1). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 40 patients (20 in each group). There was no significant difference in age between the groups. After the rise in mean arterial pressure, there was a significant increase in cardiac index and a slight but significant reduction in lactate in both groups. We observed a significant improvement in the proportion of perfused vessels (control: 57.2 ± 14% to 66 ± 14.8%; arterial hypertension: 61.4 ± 12.3% to 70.8 ± 7.1%; groups: p = 0.29; T0 and T1: p < 0.001; group and time interaction: p = 0.85); perfused vessels density (control: 15.6 ± 4 mm/mm to 18.6 ± 4.5 mm/mm; arterial hypertension: 16.4 ± 3.5 mm/mm to 19.1 ± 3 mm/mm; groups: p = 0.51; T0 and T1: p < 0.001; group and time interaction: p = 0.70), and microcirculatory flow index (control: 2.1 ± 0.6 to 2.4 ± 0.6; arterial hypertension: 2.1 ± 0.5 to 2.6 ± 0.2; groups: p = 0.71; T0 and T1: p = 0.002; group and time interaction: p = 0.45) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing mean arterial pressure with noradrenaline in septic shock patients improves density and flow in small vessels of sublingual microcirculation. However, this improvement occurs both in patients with previous arterial hypertension and in those without arterial hypertension.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased positive end-expiratory pressure on the sublingual microcirculation. Methods: Adult patients who were sedated, under mechanical ventilation, and had a diagnosis of circulatory shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome were included. The positive end-expiratory pressure level was settled to obtain a plateau pressure of 30 cm H2O and then maintained at this level for 20 minutes. Microcirculatory (obtained by videomicroscopy) and hemodynamic variables were collected at baseline and compared with those at the end of 20 min. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled. Overall, the microcirculation parameters did not significantly change after increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure. However, there was considerable interindividual variability. There was a negative, moderate correlation between the changes in the De Backer score (r = -0.58, p = 0.048), total vessel density (r = -0.60, p = 0.039) and baseline values. The changes in total vessel density (r = 0.54, p = 0.07) and perfused vessel density (r = 0.52, p = 0.08) trended toward correlating with the changes in the mean arterial pressure. Conclusion: Overall, the microcirculation parameters did not significantly change after increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure. However, at individual level, such response was heterogeneous. The changes in the microcirculation parameters could be correlated with the baseline values and changes in the mean arterial pressure.

Resumo Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto do aumento de pressão positiva no fim da expiração (PEEP) sobre a microcirculação sublingual. Métodos: Os pacientes adultos que foram sedados, sob ventilação mecânica, com diagnóstico de choque circulatório e síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo foram incluídos. O nível da PEEP foi estabelecido para obter uma pressão de platô de 30 cmH2O e depois mantido nesse nível por 20 minutos. As variáveis de microcirculação (obtida por microscopia de vídeo) e hemodinâmica foram registradas na fase basal e comparadas com aquelas no fim de 20 min. Resultados: Doze pacientes foram incluídos. Em geral, os parâmetros da microcirculação não apresentaram alterações significativas após o aumento da PEEP. Porém, houve considerável variabilidade interindividual. Houve uma correlação negativa, moderada, entre as alterações no escore de De Backer (r = -0,58, p = 0,048), na densidade total do vaso (r = -0,60, p = 0,039) e nos valores basais. As alterações na densidade total do vaso (r = 0,54, p = 0,07) e na densidade do vaso perfundido (r = 0,52, p = 0,08) apresentaram tendência de correlação com as alterações na pressão arterial média. Conclusão: Em geral, os parâmetros da microcirculação não apresentaram alterações significativas após o aumento da PEEP. No entanto, individualmente, essa resposta foi heterogênea. As alterações nos parâmetros da microcirculação puderam ser correlacionadas com os valores basais e alterações na pressão arterial média.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased positive end-expiratory pressure on the sublingual microcirculation. METHODS: Adult patients who were sedated, under mechanical ventilation, and had a diagnosis of circulatory shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome were included. The positive end-expiratory pressure level was settled to obtain a plateau pressure of 30cmH2O and then maintained at this level for 20minutes. Microcirculatory (obtained by videomicroscopy) and hemodynamic variables were collected at baseline and compared with those at the end of 20min. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. Overall, the microcirculation parameters did not significantly change after increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure. However, there was considerable interindividual variability. There was a negative, moderate correlation between the changes in the De Backer score (r=-0.58, p=0.048), total vessel density (r=-0.60, p=0.039) and baseline values. The changes in total vessel density (r=0.54, p=0.07) and perfused vessel density (r=0.52, p=0.08) trended toward correlating with the changes in the mean arterial pressure. CONCLUSION: Overall, the microcirculation parameters did not significantly change after increasing the positive end-expiratory pressure. However, at individual level, such response was heterogeneous. The changes in the microcirculation parameters could be correlated with the baseline values and changes in the mean arterial pressure.

Assuntos