RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether residents who trained with a colocated or integrated behavioral/mental health professional (B/MHP) reported greater competence in the assessment and management of behavioral/mental health (B/MH) conditions than those who trained without an onsite B/MHP. We hypothesized that having an onsite B/MHP would be associated with greater self-reported competence, especially if integrated into clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of applicants for the initial American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) certifying examination. The independent variable was training in a continuity clinic with no onsite B/MHP, a colocated B/MHP, or an integrated B/MHP. Outcome variables were self-reported competence in 7 B/MH assessment skills and 9 treatment skills, summarized as 2 composite measures. Competence was rated on a 5-point scale; high competence was defined as mean scores ≥4. Logistic regression assessed relationships between independent and outcome variables adjusting for covariates including individual and residency program characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1503 eligible respondents, 645 (42.9%) reported no onsite B/MHP, 390 (26.0%) a colocated B/MHP, and 468 (31.1%) an integrated B/MHP. In multivariable models, respondents with a colocated B/MHP reported greater levels of B/MH assessment competence (aOR 1.40, 95% CI1.06-1.86) and treatment competence (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.05) compared with those with no B/MHP. Respondents with an integrated B/MHP similarly reported greater odds of assessment (aOR 1.33, 95%CI 1.02-1.74) and treatment competence (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.13) than the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: Although specific mechanisms were not tested, training with an onsite B/MHP within a continuity clinic may improve pediatric trainees' competence for addressing B/MH conditions.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Psiquiatria , Criança , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Saúde MentalRESUMO
Regions of the US with growing Latino populations are in need of culturally sensitive sexual risk reduction programs. A Latino community, a public school district, and a university in eastern North Carolina collaborated to test the feasibility of ¡Cuídate!, a culturally tailored, evidence-based sexual risk reduction program, with Mexican and Central American youth. Ten male and 10 female adolescents, ages 13-17 years, participated in the ¡Cuídate! program and post-program focus groups. Early adolescent boys and girls (ages 13-15) gained the most from this program. A safe environment facilitated healthy sexual communication, and condom skills-building provided a context for shared partner responsibility. Grade-level and gender differences were significant. Analysis of the focus group data identified three important messages: Everybody needs sex education, We like this program better because it is hands-on, and I'm going to make better decisions about sex. The findings of this study support the need for community-based interventions that ensure cultural respect, trust, and a safe environment in which to discuss sexual issues.