RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We explored whether the maximum predicted walking distance, assessed with six-minute walk test (6MWT) and reflecting submaximal functional exercise capacity, is decreased among patients with pectus excavatum (PEX). METHODS: This study comprised a retrospective analysis of patients with PEX who underwent a 6MWT for the assessment of functional capacity. The maximum distance walked was recorded and compared to reference values established for different populations, including a young and healthy South American population. RESULTS: We included 43 patients with PEX who underwent 6MWT. The mean age was 17.8 ± 6.7 years. The mean maximum distance walked was significantly lower than the predicted distance (600.8 ± 67.6 metres vs. 729.8 ± 67.5 metres, p < 0.0001). Using the Enright reference equation including an older reference population, the mean negative difference was higher (PEX patients walked 190.4 ± 78.4 metres less than predicted, p < 0.0001). We also applied the Li et al. reference equation accounting for sex among other variables, detecting a decreased walked distance compared to the gender-adjusted predicted distance (PEX patients walked a mean 222.4 ± 87.4 metres less than predicted, p < 0.0001). Using the Ulrich et al. equation, PEX patients walked a mean 114.2 ± 85.1 metres less than predicted (p < 0.0001). Although of uncertain clinical relevance, there was a significant decrease in the mean oxygen saturation after exercise (baseline 97.4 ± 1.2%, vs. final 96.4 ± 2.1%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we identified a significant reduction in the maximum walked distance among patients with PEX compared to the predicted distance, thus potentially emerging as an unsophisticated means to evaluate and quantify functional exercise capacity.
Assuntos
Tórax em Funil , Coração , Pulmão , Caminhada , Humanos , Tórax em Funil/fisiopatologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Coração/fisiopatologia , Teste de Caminhada , Masculino , Feminino , Saturação de Oxigênio , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The development of computer-aided design/manufacturing and digital image technology shows promise to revolutionize several medical and surgical fields. In this context, we propose a different approach for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) including preoperative planning, ambulatory template fitting, and implant customization. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 130 consecutive patients who underwent a novel process of implant customization for MIRPE between November 2015 and September 2019 at our institution. This process consisted of: 1) preoperative planning using 3D computed tomography scan reconstruction and 3D printing of the implant template, 2) an ambulatory fitting session with the template, and 3) manufacture of a custom made, prebent, metallic implant based on the 3D printed templates. We described the process in detail and analyzed the "implant-deformity" match, need for rebending, modification of the curvature or shape of the pectus implant intraoperatively, and accuracy of the number of bars planned preoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperative planning including 3D reconstruction and printing resulted in a 92.3% optimal "implant-deformity" anatomic match. Minimal rebending without flipping of the implants was required in 5.4% of the patients. In two cases (1.5%), the implants were too short, and they tended to sink into the intercostal space, and in one case (0.8%), the patient's chest was extremely asymmetric, and the implant had to be removed and rebent intraoperatively. The number of implants planned preoperatively was precise in 100%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum assisted by preoperative planning, ambulatory template fitting, and implant customization enables an excellent anatomic match, leading to minimal rebending, and avoiding implant flipping or removal after retrosternal passage as well as accuracy in the number of bars programmed preoperatively. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective registry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.